You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to c-user@axis.apache.org by vamsi krishna <va...@yahoo.com> on 2008/07/01 08:07:21 UTC
Why Axis2C ?
Hi Friends,
Can any of you answer
1. Why should we use Axis2C when we have other tools like gSoap?
2. What are the differentiating factors between Axis2C and gSoap?
3. Isn't Axis2C heavier compared to gSoap, with its Axiom architectire? If no, why? If yes, what other advantages of Axiom is making us use it with Axis2C? [In terms of memory usage, efficiency, speed, etc.]
Eagerly waiting for your reply.
Vamsi, IIIT-Hyd.
Re: Why Axis2C ?
Posted by Dinesh Premalal <xy...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:37 AM, vamsi krishna <va...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Friends,
>
> Can any of you answer
>
> 1. Why should we use Axis2C when we have other tools like
> gSoap?
>
One reason for using Axis2/C is the only stack that implemented large number
of WS-* specifications. Like WS-Addressing, WS-Security,
WS-ReliableMessaging, WS-Eventing, WS-Policy etc.
thanks,
Dinesh
--
http://nethu.org/
Re: Why Axis2C ?
Posted by Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@wso2.com>.
Hi Friends,
Can any of you answer
1. Why should we use Axis2C when we have other tools like gSoap?
The choice is yours. And the choice should be based on your
requirements. You should look for the technical factor as well as other
factors such as license.
2. What are the differentiating factors between Axis2C and
gSoap?
Architecture, design, implementation and the number of specs supported.
3. Isn't Axis2C heavier compared to gSoap, with its Axiom
architectire? If no, why? If yes, what other advantages of Axiom is
making us use it with Axis2C? [In terms of memory usage, efficiency,
speed, etc.]
There has been no formal evaluation on performance or memory footprint
AFAIK. We believe AXIOM to be one of the key factors driving Axis2/C's
performance. In addition to that, the number of specs supported too are
empowered by the architecture that bulds on AXIOM.
Thanks,
Samisa...
Eagerly waiting for your reply.
vamsi krishna wrote:
>
> Hi Friends,
>
> Can any of you answer
>
> 1. Why should we use Axis2C when we have other tools like
> gSoap?
>
> 2. What are the differentiating factors between Axis2C and
> gSoap?
>
> 3. Isn't Axis2C heavier compared to gSoap, with its Axiom
> architectire? If no, why? If yes, what other advantages of Axiom is
> making us use it with Axis2C? [In terms of memory usage, efficiency,
> speed, etc.]
>
>
>
> Eagerly waiting for your reply.
>
>
>
> Vamsi, IIIT-Hyd.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.101 / Virus Database: 270.4.3/1527 - Release Date: 6/30/2008 6:07 PM
>
--
Samisa Abeysinghe
Director, Engineering; WSO2 Inc.
http://www.wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-user-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Why Axis2C ?
Posted by Rajika Kumarasiri <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:37 AM, vamsi krishna <va...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Friends,
>
> Can any of you answer
>
> 1. Why should we use Axis2C when we have other tools like
> gSoap?
>
> 2. What are the differentiating factors between Axis2C and
> gSoap?
>
There was a rough comparison between gSoap and Axis2/C some time back in the
same list.
-Rajika
> 3. Isn't Axis2C heavier compared to gSoap, with its Axiom
> architectire? If no, why? If yes, what other advantages of Axiom is making
> us use it with Axis2C? [In terms of memory usage, efficiency, speed, etc.]
>
>
>
> Eagerly waiting for your reply.
>
>
> Vamsi, IIIT-Hyd.
>
>
--
comp.lang.c - http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c/topics