You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "Erik Holstad (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/02/07 03:44:59 UTC

[jira] Assigned: (HBASE-1189) Changing the map type used internally for HbaseMapWritable.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Erik Holstad reassigned HBASE-1189:
-----------------------------------

    Assignee: Erik Holstad

> Changing the map type used internally  for HbaseMapWritable. 
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-1189
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1189
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: io
>            Reporter: Erik Holstad
>            Assignee: Erik Holstad
>            Priority: Minor
>
> For the CellCache the need for a HbaseMapWritable that has a different kind of map used internally
> has showed up. The problem is that the instantiation of the map is done static so you have no control 
> over it and if extending HMW you get both the memory usage for the parent as well as the child.
> After trying out different ideas on how to solve this, it seems like the easiest way would be to have a setMapType
> method and just set it to null in the code. If the old code would be kept you would need to instantiate 2
> different maps. The problem with setting it to null is that all the old code needs to be changed to fit the new model,
> and also be used in the future.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.