[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-40) Lifecycle management should be orthogonal.

["Matt Sicker (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13976345#comment-13976345 ] 

Matt Sicker commented on LOG4J2-40:
-----------------------------------

This is something I've suggested recently, actually.

> Lifecycle management should be orthogonal.
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-40
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-40
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ralph Goers
>
> Curt added the comment to several methods in my branch. This comment needs more elaboration on how the "container" should start and stop the components without requiring those components to implement an interface. Is the suggestion meant to imply that there should be a Lifecycle interface that the interfaces in question extend?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org