You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@karaf.apache.org by Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com> on 2011/11/14 13:38:56 UTC
Karaf with wrapper on 64 bit java
I recently tried to run Karaf (as a Windows service) on 64 bit java (on
Windows Server 2008). This does not seem to work properly. You get a
serious warning in wrapper's log file that you're trying to run the 32 bit
Wrapper on 64 bit java.
I looked at http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com and it seems like they do
provide 64 bit versions as well. I think it would be nice if Karaf could
provide both the 32 bit and the 64 bit version out-of-the box. Some logic
to determine which one to install is of course required. Perhaps it could
be separate features - one for the 32 bit wrapper and one for the 64 bit
wrapper.
It's becoming very common to use 64 bit java now so I think this is
important.
I assume that Karaf is using the community version of the Tanuki wrapper.
In that case it uses a GPL license. Is this really compatible with Apache's
license? What happens if we bundle Karaf (and the Tanuki wrapper) with our
applications? Does that require us to freely distribute our source code?
/Benke
Re: Karaf with wrapper on 64 bit java
Posted by Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>.
Perfect,
/Bengt
2011/11/15 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> Hi guys,
>
> I updated the wrapper in Karaf 2.2.4 to use 64 bits on Linux.
>
> I'm gonna take a look on that one.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 11/14/2011 04:27 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> thanx for giving this hint, I'll see if we can also use it.
>> I opened a issue for this to keep track of it:
>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/KARAF-1010<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1010>
>>
>> Regards, Achim
>>
>> 2011/11/14 Dan Tran <dantran@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>
>>
>> May be this can help
>>
>> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.**com/Looking-for-free-wrapper-**
>> windows-x86-64-exe-version-3-**2-3-td4851520.html<http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Looking-for-free-wrapper-windows-x86-64-exe-version-3-2-3-td4851520.html>
>>
>> Karaf may be able to add the missing win 64 wrapper to it's
>> distribution?
>>
>> -d
>>
>>
>> On Monday, November 14, 2011, Achim Nierbeck
>> <bcanhome@googlemail.com <ma...@googlemail.com>>>
>> wrote:
>> > AFAIR there used to be a "dual-licensed" version available, which
>> isn't anymore and the last version of those dual-licensed is used.
>> > Actually for Linux I think the 64bit was still available, but I'm
>> not certain it is for windows.
>> > So right now to find the version used, you might either consult
>> the karaf jira or try to find it at the wrapper site :)
>> > Regards, Achim
>> >
>> > 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <bengt@rodehav.com
>> <ma...@rodehav.com>>
>>
>> >>
>> >> Achim,
>> >> I guess that answers my question whether Apache is compatible
>> with GPL or not and the answer then is no.
>> >> The 32 bit versions are licensed the same way as the 64 bit
>> versions. How do we know that the wrapper bundled with Karaf is not
>> GPL today? What version is it?
>> >> /Bengt
>> >>
>> >> 2011/11/14 Achim Nierbeck <bcanhome@googlemail.com
>> <mailto:bcanhome@googlemail.**com <bc...@googlemail.com>>>
>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi Bengt,
>> >>> this strongly depends if the corresponding 64 bit service
>> wrapper is available at a ASF friendly license.
>> >>> AFAIR the newer versions of the service wrapper libraries are
>> not Apache License 2 friendly and therefore can not be used.
>> >>> You still might just use another version of the wrapper by
>> installing/upgrading it yourself :)
>> >>> Regards, Achim
>> >>>
>> >>> 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <bengt@rodehav.com
>> <ma...@rodehav.com>>
>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I recently tried to run Karaf (as a Windows service) on 64 bit
>> java (on Windows Server 2008). This does not seem to work properly.
>> You get a serious warning in wrapper's log file that you're trying
>> to run the 32 bit Wrapper on 64 bit java.
>> >>>> I looked at http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.**com<http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com>and it seems
>> like they do provide 64 bit versions as well. I think it would be
>> nice if Karaf could provide both the 32 bit and the 64 bit version
>> out-of-the box. Some logic to determine which one to install is of
>> course required. Perhaps it could be separate features - one for the
>> 32 bit wrapper and one for the 64 bit wrapper.
>> >>>> It's becoming very common to use 64 bit java now so I think
>> this is important.
>> >>>> I assume that Karaf is using the community version of the
>> Tanuki wrapper. In that case it uses a GPL license. Is this really
>> compatible with Apache's license? What happens if we bundle Karaf
>> (and the Tanuki wrapper) with our applications? Does that require us
>> to freely distribute our source code?
>> >>>> /Benke
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> *Achim Nierbeck*
>> >>>
>> >>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> >>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/**display/paxweb/Pax+Web/<http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>> >
>> Committer & Project Lead
>> >>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/**>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Achim Nierbeck*
>> >
>> > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/**display/paxweb/Pax+Web/<http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>> >
>> Committer & Project Lead
>> > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/**>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Achim Nierbeck*
>>
>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/**display/paxweb/Pax+Web/<http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>>
>> Committer
>> & Project Lead
>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/**>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: Karaf with wrapper on 64 bit java
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi guys,
I updated the wrapper in Karaf 2.2.4 to use 64 bits on Linux.
I'm gonna take a look on that one.
Regards
JB
On 11/14/2011 04:27 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> thanx for giving this hint, I'll see if we can also use it.
> I opened a issue for this to keep track of it:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1010
>
> Regards, Achim
>
> 2011/11/14 Dan Tran <dantran@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>
> May be this can help
>
> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Looking-for-free-wrapper-windows-x86-64-exe-version-3-2-3-td4851520.html
>
> Karaf may be able to add the missing win 64 wrapper to it's
> distribution?
>
> -d
>
>
> On Monday, November 14, 2011, Achim Nierbeck
> <bcanhome@googlemail.com <ma...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
> > AFAIR there used to be a "dual-licensed" version available, which
> isn't anymore and the last version of those dual-licensed is used.
> > Actually for Linux I think the 64bit was still available, but I'm
> not certain it is for windows.
> > So right now to find the version used, you might either consult
> the karaf jira or try to find it at the wrapper site :)
> > Regards, Achim
> >
> > 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <bengt@rodehav.com
> <ma...@rodehav.com>>
> >>
> >> Achim,
> >> I guess that answers my question whether Apache is compatible
> with GPL or not and the answer then is no.
> >> The 32 bit versions are licensed the same way as the 64 bit
> versions. How do we know that the wrapper bundled with Karaf is not
> GPL today? What version is it?
> >> /Bengt
> >>
> >> 2011/11/14 Achim Nierbeck <bcanhome@googlemail.com
> <ma...@googlemail.com>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Bengt,
> >>> this strongly depends if the corresponding 64 bit service
> wrapper is available at a ASF friendly license.
> >>> AFAIR the newer versions of the service wrapper libraries are
> not Apache License 2 friendly and therefore can not be used.
> >>> You still might just use another version of the wrapper by
> installing/upgrading it yourself :)
> >>> Regards, Achim
> >>>
> >>> 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <bengt@rodehav.com
> <ma...@rodehav.com>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I recently tried to run Karaf (as a Windows service) on 64 bit
> java (on Windows Server 2008). This does not seem to work properly.
> You get a serious warning in wrapper's log file that you're trying
> to run the 32 bit Wrapper on 64 bit java.
> >>>> I looked at http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com and it seems
> like they do provide 64 bit versions as well. I think it would be
> nice if Karaf could provide both the 32 bit and the 64 bit version
> out-of-the box. Some logic to determine which one to install is of
> course required. Perhaps it could be separate features - one for the
> 32 bit wrapper and one for the 64 bit wrapper.
> >>>> It's becoming very common to use 64 bit java now so I think
> this is important.
> >>>> I assume that Karaf is using the community version of the
> Tanuki wrapper. In that case it uses a GPL license. Is this really
> compatible with Apache's license? What happens if we bundle Karaf
> (and the Tanuki wrapper) with our applications? Does that require us
> to freely distribute our source code?
> >>>> /Benke
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> *Achim Nierbeck*
> >>>
> >>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> >>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> Committer & Project Lead
> >>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Achim Nierbeck*
> >
> > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> Committer & Project Lead
> > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Achim Nierbeck*
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer
> & Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Karaf with wrapper on 64 bit java
Posted by Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>.
Looks promising - maybe Karaf can support a 64 bit wrapper after all.
I guess long term someone need to find a more Apache license friendly
alternative to provide Wdinows services. Sounds like Apache should provide
a project for this since so many Apache projects seem to depend on the
service wrapper under Windows.
/Bengt
2011/11/14 Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>
> Hi Dan,
>
> thanx for giving this hint, I'll see if we can also use it.
> I opened a issue for this to keep track of it:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1010
>
> Regards, Achim
>
>
> 2011/11/14 Dan Tran <da...@gmail.com>
>
>> May be this can help
>>
>>
>> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Looking-for-free-wrapper-windows-x86-64-exe-version-3-2-3-td4851520.html
>>
>> Karaf may be able to add the missing win 64 wrapper to it's
>> distribution?
>>
>> -d
>>
>>
>> On Monday, November 14, 2011, Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > AFAIR there used to be a "dual-licensed" version available, which isn't
>> anymore and the last version of those dual-licensed is used.
>> > Actually for Linux I think the 64bit was still available, but I'm not
>> certain it is for windows.
>> > So right now to find the version used, you might either consult the
>> karaf jira or try to find it at the wrapper site :)
>> > Regards, Achim
>> >
>> > 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>
>> >>
>> >> Achim,
>> >> I guess that answers my question whether Apache is compatible with GPL
>> or not and the answer then is no.
>> >> The 32 bit versions are licensed the same way as the 64 bit versions.
>> How do we know that the wrapper bundled with Karaf is not GPL today? What
>> version is it?
>> >> /Bengt
>> >>
>> >> 2011/11/14 Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi Bengt,
>> >>> this strongly depends if the corresponding 64 bit service wrapper is
>> available at a ASF friendly license.
>> >>> AFAIR the newer versions of the service wrapper libraries are not
>> Apache License 2 friendly and therefore can not be used.
>> >>> You still might just use another version of the wrapper by
>> installing/upgrading it yourself :)
>> >>> Regards, Achim
>> >>>
>> >>> 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I recently tried to run Karaf (as a Windows service) on 64 bit java
>> (on Windows Server 2008). This does not seem to work properly. You get a
>> serious warning in wrapper's log file that you're trying to run the 32 bit
>> Wrapper on 64 bit java.
>> >>>> I looked at http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com and it seems like
>> they do provide 64 bit versions as well. I think it would be nice if Karaf
>> could provide both the 32 bit and the 64 bit version out-of-the box. Some
>> logic to determine which one to install is of course required. Perhaps it
>> could be separate features - one for the 32 bit wrapper and one for the 64
>> bit wrapper.
>> >>>> It's becoming very common to use 64 bit java now so I think this is
>> important.
>> >>>> I assume that Karaf is using the community version of the Tanuki
>> wrapper. In that case it uses a GPL license. Is this really compatible with
>> Apache's license? What happens if we bundle Karaf (and the Tanuki wrapper)
>> with our applications? Does that require us to freely distribute our source
>> code?
>> >>>> /Benke
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> *Achim Nierbeck*
>> >>>
>> >>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> >>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>> Committer & Project Lead
>> >>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Achim Nierbeck*
>> >
>> > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>> Committer & Project Lead
>> > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Achim Nierbeck*
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
> Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>
Re: Karaf with wrapper on 64 bit java
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Dan,
thanx for giving this hint, I'll see if we can also use it.
I opened a issue for this to keep track of it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1010
Regards, Achim
2011/11/14 Dan Tran <da...@gmail.com>
> May be this can help
>
>
> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Looking-for-free-wrapper-windows-x86-64-exe-version-3-2-3-td4851520.html
>
> Karaf may be able to add the missing win 64 wrapper to it's distribution?
>
> -d
>
>
> On Monday, November 14, 2011, Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > AFAIR there used to be a "dual-licensed" version available, which isn't
> anymore and the last version of those dual-licensed is used.
> > Actually for Linux I think the 64bit was still available, but I'm not
> certain it is for windows.
> > So right now to find the version used, you might either consult the
> karaf jira or try to find it at the wrapper site :)
> > Regards, Achim
> >
> > 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>
> >>
> >> Achim,
> >> I guess that answers my question whether Apache is compatible with GPL
> or not and the answer then is no.
> >> The 32 bit versions are licensed the same way as the 64 bit versions.
> How do we know that the wrapper bundled with Karaf is not GPL today? What
> version is it?
> >> /Bengt
> >>
> >> 2011/11/14 Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Bengt,
> >>> this strongly depends if the corresponding 64 bit service wrapper is
> available at a ASF friendly license.
> >>> AFAIR the newer versions of the service wrapper libraries are not
> Apache License 2 friendly and therefore can not be used.
> >>> You still might just use another version of the wrapper by
> installing/upgrading it yourself :)
> >>> Regards, Achim
> >>>
> >>> 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> I recently tried to run Karaf (as a Windows service) on 64 bit java
> (on Windows Server 2008). This does not seem to work properly. You get a
> serious warning in wrapper's log file that you're trying to run the 32 bit
> Wrapper on 64 bit java.
> >>>> I looked at http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com and it seems like they
> do provide 64 bit versions as well. I think it would be nice if Karaf could
> provide both the 32 bit and the 64 bit version out-of-the box. Some logic
> to determine which one to install is of course required. Perhaps it could
> be separate features - one for the 32 bit wrapper and one for the 64 bit
> wrapper.
> >>>> It's becoming very common to use 64 bit java now so I think this is
> important.
> >>>> I assume that Karaf is using the community version of the Tanuki
> wrapper. In that case it uses a GPL license. Is this really compatible with
> Apache's license? What happens if we bundle Karaf (and the Tanuki wrapper)
> with our applications? Does that require us to freely distribute our source
> code?
> >>>> /Benke
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> *Achim Nierbeck*
> >>>
> >>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> >>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> Committer & Project Lead
> >>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Achim Nierbeck*
> >
> > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer
> & Project Lead
> > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> >
>
--
*Achim Nierbeck*
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Re: Karaf with wrapper on 64 bit java
Posted by Dan Tran <da...@gmail.com>.
May be this can help
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Looking-for-free-wrapper-windows-x86-64-exe-version-3-2-3-td4851520.html
Karaf may be able to add the missing win 64 wrapper to it's distribution?
-d
On Monday, November 14, 2011, Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> AFAIR there used to be a "dual-licensed" version available, which isn't
anymore and the last version of those dual-licensed is used.
> Actually for Linux I think the 64bit was still available, but I'm not
certain it is for windows.
> So right now to find the version used, you might either consult the karaf
jira or try to find it at the wrapper site :)
> Regards, Achim
>
> 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>
>>
>> Achim,
>> I guess that answers my question whether Apache is compatible with GPL
or not and the answer then is no.
>> The 32 bit versions are licensed the same way as the 64 bit versions.
How do we know that the wrapper bundled with Karaf is not GPL today? What
version is it?
>> /Bengt
>>
>> 2011/11/14 Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>
>>>
>>> Hi Bengt,
>>> this strongly depends if the corresponding 64 bit service wrapper is
available at a ASF friendly license.
>>> AFAIR the newer versions of the service wrapper libraries are not
Apache License 2 friendly and therefore can not be used.
>>> You still might just use another version of the wrapper by
installing/upgrading it yourself :)
>>> Regards, Achim
>>>
>>> 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>
>>>>
>>>> I recently tried to run Karaf (as a Windows service) on 64 bit java
(on Windows Server 2008). This does not seem to work properly. You get a
serious warning in wrapper's log file that you're trying to run the 32 bit
Wrapper on 64 bit java.
>>>> I looked at http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com and it seems like they
do provide 64 bit versions as well. I think it would be nice if Karaf could
provide both the 32 bit and the 64 bit version out-of-the box. Some logic
to determine which one to install is of course required. Perhaps it could
be separate features - one for the 32 bit wrapper and one for the 64 bit
wrapper.
>>>> It's becoming very common to use 64 bit java now so I think this is
important.
>>>> I assume that Karaf is using the community version of the Tanuki
wrapper. In that case it uses a GPL license. Is this really compatible with
Apache's license? What happens if we bundle Karaf (and the Tanuki wrapper)
with our applications? Does that require us to freely distribute our source
code?
>>>> /Benke
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Achim Nierbeck*
>>>
>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer
& Project Lead
>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Achim Nierbeck*
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>
Re: Karaf with wrapper on 64 bit java
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
AFAIR there used to be a "dual-licensed" version available, which isn't
anymore and the last version of those dual-licensed is used.
Actually for Linux I think the 64bit was still available, but I'm not
certain it is for windows.
So right now to find the version used, you might either consult the karaf
jira or try to find it at the wrapper site :)
Regards, Achim
2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>
> Achim,
>
> I guess that answers my question whether Apache is compatible with GPL or
> not and the answer then is no.
>
> The 32 bit versions are licensed the same way as the 64 bit versions. How
> do we know that the wrapper bundled with Karaf is not GPL today? What
> version is it?
>
> /Bengt
>
>
> 2011/11/14 Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>
>
>> Hi Bengt,
>>
>> this strongly depends if the corresponding 64 bit service wrapper is
>> available at a ASF friendly license.
>> AFAIR the newer versions of the service wrapper libraries are not Apache
>> License 2 friendly and therefore can not be used.
>> You still might just use another version of the wrapper by
>> installing/upgrading it yourself :)
>>
>> Regards, Achim
>>
>>
>> 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>
>>
>>> I recently tried to run Karaf (as a Windows service) on 64 bit java (on
>>> Windows Server 2008). This does not seem to work properly. You get a
>>> serious warning in wrapper's log file that you're trying to run the 32 bit
>>> Wrapper on 64 bit java.
>>>
>>> I looked at http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com and it seems like they do
>>> provide 64 bit versions as well. I think it would be nice if Karaf could
>>> provide both the 32 bit and the 64 bit version out-of-the box. Some logic
>>> to determine which one to install is of course required. Perhaps it could
>>> be separate features - one for the 32 bit wrapper and one for the 64 bit
>>> wrapper.
>>>
>>> It's becoming very common to use 64 bit java now so I think this is
>>> important.
>>>
>>> I assume that Karaf is using the community version of the Tanuki
>>> wrapper. In that case it uses a GPL license. Is this really compatible with
>>> Apache's license? What happens if we bundle Karaf (and the Tanuki wrapper)
>>> with our applications? Does that require us to freely distribute our source
>>> code?
>>>
>>> /Benke
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Achim Nierbeck*
>>
>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer
>> & Project Lead
>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>
>
>
--
*Achim Nierbeck*
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Re: Karaf with wrapper on 64 bit java
Posted by Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>.
Achim,
I guess that answers my question whether Apache is compatible with GPL or
not and the answer then is no.
The 32 bit versions are licensed the same way as the 64 bit versions. How
do we know that the wrapper bundled with Karaf is not GPL today? What
version is it?
/Bengt
2011/11/14 Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>
> Hi Bengt,
>
> this strongly depends if the corresponding 64 bit service wrapper is
> available at a ASF friendly license.
> AFAIR the newer versions of the service wrapper libraries are not Apache
> License 2 friendly and therefore can not be used.
> You still might just use another version of the wrapper by
> installing/upgrading it yourself :)
>
> Regards, Achim
>
>
> 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>
>
>> I recently tried to run Karaf (as a Windows service) on 64 bit java (on
>> Windows Server 2008). This does not seem to work properly. You get a
>> serious warning in wrapper's log file that you're trying to run the 32 bit
>> Wrapper on 64 bit java.
>>
>> I looked at http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com and it seems like they do
>> provide 64 bit versions as well. I think it would be nice if Karaf could
>> provide both the 32 bit and the 64 bit version out-of-the box. Some logic
>> to determine which one to install is of course required. Perhaps it could
>> be separate features - one for the 32 bit wrapper and one for the 64 bit
>> wrapper.
>>
>> It's becoming very common to use 64 bit java now so I think this is
>> important.
>>
>> I assume that Karaf is using the community version of the Tanuki wrapper.
>> In that case it uses a GPL license. Is this really compatible with Apache's
>> license? What happens if we bundle Karaf (and the Tanuki wrapper) with our
>> applications? Does that require us to freely distribute our source code?
>>
>> /Benke
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Achim Nierbeck*
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
> Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>
Re: Karaf with wrapper on 64 bit java
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Bengt,
this strongly depends if the corresponding 64 bit service wrapper is
available at a ASF friendly license.
AFAIR the newer versions of the service wrapper libraries are not Apache
License 2 friendly and therefore can not be used.
You still might just use another version of the wrapper by
installing/upgrading it yourself :)
Regards, Achim
2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>
> I recently tried to run Karaf (as a Windows service) on 64 bit java (on
> Windows Server 2008). This does not seem to work properly. You get a
> serious warning in wrapper's log file that you're trying to run the 32 bit
> Wrapper on 64 bit java.
>
> I looked at http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com and it seems like they do
> provide 64 bit versions as well. I think it would be nice if Karaf could
> provide both the 32 bit and the 64 bit version out-of-the box. Some logic
> to determine which one to install is of course required. Perhaps it could
> be separate features - one for the 32 bit wrapper and one for the 64 bit
> wrapper.
>
> It's becoming very common to use 64 bit java now so I think this is
> important.
>
> I assume that Karaf is using the community version of the Tanuki wrapper.
> In that case it uses a GPL license. Is this really compatible with Apache's
> license? What happens if we bundle Karaf (and the Tanuki wrapper) with our
> applications? Does that require us to freely distribute our source code?
>
> /Benke
>
>
>
--
*Achim Nierbeck*
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>