RE: James hates mozilla? (or it just loves file handles to go with its lizards)

[Danny Angus <da...@apache.org>]

Yeah, but as someone who relies on James to provide solid service I'm still
not convinced we have all the wrinkles out, there've probably been more, and
more extensive, changes in this cycle than in any other this year.

d.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: news [mailto:news@main.gmane.org]On Behalf Of Andrew C. Oliver
> Sent: 13 August 2002 19:46
> To: james-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Re: James hates mozilla? (or it just loves file handles to go
> with its lizards)
>
>
> I updated this file from the head and it worked!  Thanks again!
>
> Between this and the SMTP auth fixes its probably getting prime time for
> a new build if you ask me.. . These changes alone are worth it.
> (speaking as a dumb user)
>
> -Andy
>
> Stephan Schiessling wrote:
> >
> > There was a bug in pop3 of James (it is already fixed in CVS),
> which may
> > couse the problem.
> > Since you like patches, you may try to modify it by hand:
> > In the source file
> > src/java/org/apache/james/core/MimeMessageSource.java
> > in the method getMessageSize()
> > the InputStream "in" must be closed.
> >
> > Bye,
> >
> > Stephan Schiessling
> >
> >
> > Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> >
> >> I recently installed JAMES (2.0.a3 and added the recent patches to
> >> enable SMTP authentication with Mozilla).  However, after getting a
> >> couple days worth of mail.  James has decided to end its relationship
> >> with my mozilla 1.0 pop client.  It claims that it will simply require
> >> more file handles.  Well I've increased them by x5 and it still wants
> >> more.
> >>
> >> It does look like mail2web.com is able to communicate, and I can
> >> telnet to the server on port 110 and do it by hand (albeit its not
> >> very convienient) and its happy but boy it sure hates the lizard.
> >>
> >> Anyone have any ideas?  Any patches to fix this?  Mozilla works with
> >> all my other email accounts.
> >>
> >> -Andy
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: James hates mozilla? (or it just loves file handles to go with its lizards)

["Andrew C. Oliver" <an...@superlinksoftware.com>]

I mean another alpha or whatever.  (2.0a4 or whatever)

Danny Angus wrote:
> Yeah, but as someone who relies on James to provide solid service I'm still
> not convinced we have all the wrinkles out, there've probably been more, and
> more extensive, changes in this cycle than in any other this year.
> 
> d.
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: news [mailto:news@main.gmane.org]On Behalf Of Andrew C. Oliver
>>Sent: 13 August 2002 19:46
>>To: james-user@jakarta.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: James hates mozilla? (or it just loves file handles to go
>>with its lizards)
>>
>>
>>I updated this file from the head and it worked!  Thanks again!
>>
>>Between this and the SMTP auth fixes its probably getting prime time for
>>a new build if you ask me.. . These changes alone are worth it.
>>(speaking as a dumb user)
>>
>>-Andy
>>
>>Stephan Schiessling wrote:
>>
>>>There was a bug in pop3 of James (it is already fixed in CVS),
>>
>>which may
>>
>>>couse the problem.
>>>Since you like patches, you may try to modify it by hand:
>>>In the source file
>>>src/java/org/apache/james/core/MimeMessageSource.java
>>>in the method getMessageSize()
>>>the InputStream "in" must be closed.
>>>
>>>Bye,
>>>
>>>Stephan Schiessling
>>>
>>>
>>>Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I recently installed JAMES (2.0.a3 and added the recent patches to
>>>>enable SMTP authentication with Mozilla).  However, after getting a
>>>>couple days worth of mail.  James has decided to end its relationship
>>>>with my mozilla 1.0 pop client.  It claims that it will simply require
>>>>more file handles.  Well I've increased them by x5 and it still wants
>>>>more.
>>>>
>>>>It does look like mail2web.com is able to communicate, and I can
>>>>telnet to the server on port 110 and do it by hand (albeit its not
>>>>very convienient) and its happy but boy it sure hates the lizard.
>>>>
>>>>Anyone have any ideas?  Any patches to fix this?  Mozilla works with
>>>>all my other email accounts.
>>>>
>>>>-Andy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>><ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>>>>For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>><ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> 
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

RE: James hates mozilla? (or it just loves file handles to go with its lizards)

["Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>]

> Yeah, but as someone who relies on James to provide solid service I'm
still
> not convinced we have all the wrinkles out, there've probably been more,
and
> more extensive, changes in this cycle than in any other this year.

Off-hand, my impression is that the majority of them have been of a nature
to fix issues, and not too much in the way of feature additions.  Most
patches have been from folks using James and wanting it to be even more
stable, reliable, performant.

	--- Noel


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>