You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Wangda Tan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/04/23 00:56:13 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (YARN-4390) Do surgical preemption based on reserved container in CapacityScheduler

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Wangda Tan updated YARN-4390:
-----------------------------
    Summary: Do surgical preemption based on reserved container in CapacityScheduler  (was: Consider container request size during CS preemption)

> Do surgical preemption based on reserved container in CapacityScheduler
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4390
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4390
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: capacity scheduler
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.8.0, 2.7.3
>            Reporter: Eric Payne
>            Assignee: Wangda Tan
>         Attachments: YARN-4390-design.1.pdf, YARN-4390-test-results.pdf, YARN-4390.1.patch, YARN-4390.2.patch, YARN-4390.3.branch-2.patch, YARN-4390.3.patch, YARN-4390.4.patch, YARN-4390.5.patch
>
>
> There are multiple reasons why preemption could unnecessarily preempt containers. One is that an app could be requesting a large container (say 8-GB), and the preemption monitor could conceivably preempt multiple containers (say 8, 1-GB containers) in order to fill the large container request. These smaller containers would then be rejected by the requesting AM and potentially given right back to the preempted app.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)