You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@deltaspike.apache.org by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> on 2016/07/08 11:38:10 UTC
Should we cut a 1.7.1?
All,
We had a pretty major issue, at least in my opinion, where anything derived
from the proxy module failed on Weld 2.x/3.x for testing purposes.
It does impact tests mostly, but I think its worth having a bug fix release
on that alone.
So what do you guys think if I roll a 1.7.1 Monday/Tuesday? Does anyone
have availability to vote?
John
Re: Should we cut a 1.7.1?
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Hey guys,
I plan to stage DS 1.7.1 tomorrow (Wednesday) evening, US Eastern. Please
shout if you see something.
John
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:39 AM John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You can find the issue here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1179
>
> It only occurs if you're using proxy and SE styled tests (e.g. Arquillian
> Weld container, Test Control module, CDI Unit).
>
> John
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:07 AM creinke <cr...@ford.com> wrote:
>
>> Could we get some more clarification on what this issue is? I just
>> finished
>> running our full battery of DeltaSpike Data tests with WELD 2.3.5-Final
>> and
>> DS 1.7.0 and did not experience any issues.
>>
>> Since DS Data requires DS Proxy, and since our tests implement pretty much
>> all of the features documented on the Delta Spike Data documentation page,
>> it's unclear what you mean by "anything derived from the proxy module".
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://apache-deltaspike-incubator-discussions.2316169.n4.nabble.com/Should-we-cut-a-1-7-1-tp4663073p4663075.html
>> Sent from the Apache DeltaSpike Incubator Discussions mailing list
>> archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
Re: Should we cut a 1.7.1?
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Hi,
You can find the issue here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1179
It only occurs if you're using proxy and SE styled tests (e.g. Arquillian
Weld container, Test Control module, CDI Unit).
John
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:07 AM creinke <cr...@ford.com> wrote:
> Could we get some more clarification on what this issue is? I just
> finished
> running our full battery of DeltaSpike Data tests with WELD 2.3.5-Final and
> DS 1.7.0 and did not experience any issues.
>
> Since DS Data requires DS Proxy, and since our tests implement pretty much
> all of the features documented on the Delta Spike Data documentation page,
> it's unclear what you mean by "anything derived from the proxy module".
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-deltaspike-incubator-discussions.2316169.n4.nabble.com/Should-we-cut-a-1-7-1-tp4663073p4663075.html
> Sent from the Apache DeltaSpike Incubator Discussions mailing list archive
> at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Should we cut a 1.7.1?
Posted by creinke <cr...@ford.com>.
Could we get some more clarification on what this issue is? I just finished
running our full battery of DeltaSpike Data tests with WELD 2.3.5-Final and
DS 1.7.0 and did not experience any issues.
Since DS Data requires DS Proxy, and since our tests implement pretty much
all of the features documented on the Delta Spike Data documentation page,
it's unclear what you mean by "anything derived from the proxy module".
Thanks
--
View this message in context: http://apache-deltaspike-incubator-discussions.2316169.n4.nabble.com/Should-we-cut-a-1-7-1-tp4663073p4663075.html
Sent from the Apache DeltaSpike Incubator Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Should we cut a 1.7.1?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi John,
Will be there to vote if needed.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
2016-07-08 13:38 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
> All,
>
> We had a pretty major issue, at least in my opinion, where anything derived
> from the proxy module failed on Weld 2.x/3.x for testing purposes.
>
> It does impact tests mostly, but I think its worth having a bug fix release
> on that alone.
>
> So what do you guys think if I roll a 1.7.1 Monday/Tuesday? Does anyone
> have availability to vote?
>
> John
>