You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bsf-dev@jakarta.apache.org by ant elder <an...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/26 23:27:42 UTC
[VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0-beta1 release.
The source, binary, and maven artifacts are at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/
The svn tag is at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-beta1/
Here's my +1 (non-binding I believe)
...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On 3/30/07, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
<snip/>
>> - No javadoc in binary dist
> >
> >
> > These are both true. Next release? Also note that right now most Javadoc
> > comments just refer to the Sun docs, eg see:
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/trunk/bsf3/bsf-api/src/main/java/javax/script/SimpleScriptContext.java
>
> Also not useful for other bsf classes ? Not a blocker though for a beta
> release, would be nice to
> have javadoc for the final though. (I assume javadoc will be available
> online ?).
>
> Also with maven2 it's quite easy to create a javadoc jar and source jars
> (I like those to be
> available in the repository). (targets are source:jar and javadoc:jar).
> Willing to help out here if
> you like (it's pretty simple to configure)
That would be fantastic if you have time to help! I agree it would be really
good to get the source and javadoc jars available in the maven repo. Also it
sounds like you know a bit about maven so a review of the current build
would be good. I'm no maven expert and the build is cobbled together from
copying bits and pieces from other projects, I'm sure it has things that
could be tidied up.
...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>.
ant elder wrote:
> Thanks for the review. Answers in line.
>
> ...ant
>
> On 3/29/07, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
>>
>> - Couldn't find a KEYS file to verify your signature (checked svn trunk)
>
>
> Now added: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/trunk/KEYS
Will check it tonight :)
>
> - The
>> bsf-engines/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/javax.script/ScriptEngineFactory
>>
>> doesn't
>> contain a license (if it doesn't run with the license, leave it out
>> though)
>
>
> I couldn't find the right comment sequence to get it to work, I think i
> read
> somewhere its ok for a file like this to not have a license header
In this case it is ok to leave it out, since you will end up with an unworkable solution.
>
> - bsf-3.0-beta1-bin.tar.gz looks kind of weird in the META-INF directory
>> (there is a META-INF
>> directory in there)
>
>
> This appears to be a bug with the pnuts engine. This isn't a blocker is it?
Nope, just something that looked weird. Btw was pnuts also under a bsd license (could be that you
need to add an extra license for just pnuts)
>
>
> - You have built with jdk1.5, although the version supported is
> 1.4.2(assuming you developed using
>> jdk1.4.2)
>
>
> Thats true. The maven-compiler-plugin is set to use 1.4 though and I have
> used this with Synapse using 1.4.2 i think. Is this an issue?
Just making sure you were aware of it :)
>
> - Not sure if we are allowed to distribute the javax packages, since we
>> didn't pass the TCK yet
>> (even though there is a disclaimer). I seem to recall reading somewhere
>> (very vague, I know), that
>> you cannot use the package name until distributed (geir or someone else
>> who knows better, please
>> correct me)
>
>
> Geir has said it is ok:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-bsf-dev/200703.mbox/%3c71e1b5740703150549p2b0eb58kfe615485afbb69a7@mail.gmail.com%3e
Totally missed / forgot that mail (trying to keep with a bit too much mail)..
>
>
> - Are we allowed to redistribute the engines in bsf-engines ? Doest BSF
> work
>> without them ?
>
>
> This is a point in time thing to make BSF useful without requiring uses do
> extra downloads. I hope we can stop doing this in the near future by
> implementing a core set of our own engines, or in the more medium term
> future, i think script languages don't include a JSR-223 engine today as
> there's no JSR-223 API impl available under a good license, so once BSF
> passes the TCK script languages may start including their own JSR-223
> engine.
>
> I believe we are ok distributing them for now. They are under a BSD license
> which according to the 3rd party licensing policy is a "Category A:
> Authorized License". See: http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html and
> https://scripting.dev.java.net/.
the license is good indeed.. com.sun packages still trigger some alarm bells, even though it was
clear from the distribuation it was under BSD. :) (rather be safe to ask for confirmation than to be
sorry :)
>
> - What is the distribution directory in the src zip / tgz ?
>
>
> It contains the build scripts to build the bsf-all jar and for the maven
> assembly plugin to create the bin and src distributions.
ok..
>
> - No site in source (maybe useful in dist?)
>> - No javadoc in binary dist
>
>
> These are both true. Next release? Also note that right now most Javadoc
> comments just refer to the Sun docs, eg see:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/trunk/bsf3/bsf-api/src/main/java/javax/script/SimpleScriptContext.java
Also not useful for other bsf classes ? Not a blocker though for a beta release, would be nice to
have javadoc for the final though. (I assume javadoc will be available online ?).
Also with maven2 it's quite easy to create a javadoc jar and source jars (I like those to be
available in the repository). (targets are source:jar and javadoc:jar). Willing to help out here if
you like (it's pretty simple to configure)
Mvgr,
Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the review. Answers in line.
...ant
On 3/29/07, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
>
> - Couldn't find a KEYS file to verify your signature (checked svn trunk)
Now added: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/trunk/KEYS
- The
> bsf-engines/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/javax.script/ScriptEngineFactory
> doesn't
> contain a license (if it doesn't run with the license, leave it out
> though)
I couldn't find the right comment sequence to get it to work, I think i read
somewhere its ok for a file like this to not have a license header
- bsf-3.0-beta1-bin.tar.gz looks kind of weird in the META-INF directory
> (there is a META-INF
> directory in there)
This appears to be a bug with the pnuts engine. This isn't a blocker is it?
- You have built with jdk1.5, although the version supported is
1.4.2(assuming you developed using
> jdk1.4.2)
Thats true. The maven-compiler-plugin is set to use 1.4 though and I have
used this with Synapse using 1.4.2 i think. Is this an issue?
- Not sure if we are allowed to distribute the javax packages, since we
> didn't pass the TCK yet
> (even though there is a disclaimer). I seem to recall reading somewhere
> (very vague, I know), that
> you cannot use the package name until distributed (geir or someone else
> who knows better, please
> correct me)
Geir has said it is ok:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-bsf-dev/200703.mbox/%3c71e1b5740703150549p2b0eb58kfe615485afbb69a7@mail.gmail.com%3e
- Are we allowed to redistribute the engines in bsf-engines ? Doest BSF work
> without them ?
This is a point in time thing to make BSF useful without requiring uses do
extra downloads. I hope we can stop doing this in the near future by
implementing a core set of our own engines, or in the more medium term
future, i think script languages don't include a JSR-223 engine today as
there's no JSR-223 API impl available under a good license, so once BSF
passes the TCK script languages may start including their own JSR-223
engine.
I believe we are ok distributing them for now. They are under a BSD license
which according to the 3rd party licensing policy is a "Category A:
Authorized License". See: http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html and
https://scripting.dev.java.net/.
- What is the distribution directory in the src zip / tgz ?
It contains the build scripts to build the bsf-all jar and for the maven
assembly plugin to create the bin and src distributions.
- No site in source (maybe useful in dist?)
> - No javadoc in binary dist
These are both true. Next release? Also note that right now most Javadoc
comments just refer to the Sun docs, eg see:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/trunk/bsf3/bsf-api/src/main/java/javax/script/SimpleScriptContext.java
Some are blocking, some are not (also depending on some answers) :)
>
> Mvgr,
> Martin
>
>
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0-beta1 release.
> >
> > The source, binary, and maven artifacts are at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/
> >
> > The svn tag is at:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-beta1/
> >
> > Here's my +1 (non-binding I believe)
> >
> > ...ant
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>.
- Couldn't find a KEYS file to verify your signature (checked svn trunk)
- The bsf-engines/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/javax.script/ScriptEngineFactory doesn't
contain a license (if it doesn't run with the license, leave it out though)
- bsf-3.0-beta1-bin.tar.gz looks kind of weird in the META-INF directory (there is a META-INF
directory in there)
- You have built with jdk1.5, although the version supported is 1.4.2 (assuming you developed using
jdk1.4.2)
- Not sure if we are allowed to distribute the javax packages, since we didn't pass the TCK yet
(even though there is a disclaimer). I seem to recall reading somewhere (very vague, I know), that
you cannot use the package name until distributed (geir or someone else who knows better, please
correct me)
- Are we allowed to redistribute the engines in bsf-engines ? Doest BSF work without them ?
- What is the distribution directory in the src zip / tgz ?
- No site in source (maybe useful in dist?)
- No javadoc in binary dist
Some are blocking, some are not (also depending on some answers) :)
Mvgr,
Martin
ant elder wrote:
> Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0-beta1 release.
>
> The source, binary, and maven artifacts are at:
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/
>
> The svn tag is at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-beta1/
>
> Here's my +1 (non-binding I believe)
>
> ...ant
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
The samples from BSF 2.4.0 haven't been ported up to the latest code yet,
hopefully we can do that for the next release.
The name 'beta1' seemed appropriate as the actual javax.script API classes
in the bsf-api jar should be pretty stable now. I said in the original
release discussion this should be quite a low key release, the lack of
samples and other things like bsf-utils aren't so stable as the bsf-api yet.
The main purpose of this release is so other projects like Synapse, Tuscany
and Axis2 can start to use it and help validate the code. Without a real
release like this is hard to get that to happen with just SNAPSHOT releases.
...ant
On 3/27/07, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk> wrote:
>
> I've downloaded it too and will review it. I didn't see the samples
> packaged .. do we not include them anymore. (I have to admit I haven't
> looked at the BSF packages since I last did the dist ..)
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > As this is my first time at a BSF and Jakarta release I'd actually put
> up
> > the artifacts a while before I sent out the email to the dev list.
> >
> > I take your point though and as this is the 1st release towards BSF 3.0I
> > hope there is a thorough review. AIUI neither of our votes are binding
> yet,
> > we'll need 3 Jakarta PMC votes to pass, and that should help with
> getting a
> > thorough review. Any chance you could review and cast a vote?
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> > On 3/27/07, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> In my mailbox the start time of the vote is 8 minutes before you voted
> >> (if
> >> this is wrong please let
> >> me know, but assuming this is correct) :
> >>
> >> How did you check the release in 8 minutes ? Even with a tool it's
> almost
> >> impossible to do a
> >> reasonable check in that time.
> >>
> >> Just making sure a release is actually checked before it goes out the
> >> door
> >> and if it is checked it
> >> means that it is more likely to be *legally* ok.
> >>
> >> Mvgr,
> >> Martin
> >>
> >> Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
> >> > ant,
> >> >
> >> > thank you very much for all your *great* efforts!
> >> >
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > ---rony
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ant elder wrote:
> >> >> Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0-beta1 release.
> >> >>
> >> >> The source, binary, and maven artifacts are at:
> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/
> >> >>
> >> >> The svn tag is at:
> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-beta1/
> >> >>
> >> >> Here's my +1 (non-binding I believe)
> >> >>
> >> >> ...ant
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
> Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/
> Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
> Director; Open Source Initiative; http://www.opensource.org/
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
> Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
I've downloaded it too and will review it. I didn't see the samples
packaged .. do we not include them anymore. (I have to admit I haven't
looked at the BSF packages since I last did the dist ..)
Sanjiva.
ant elder wrote:
> As this is my first time at a BSF and Jakarta release I'd actually put up
> the artifacts a while before I sent out the email to the dev list.
>
> I take your point though and as this is the 1st release towards BSF 3.0 I
> hope there is a thorough review. AIUI neither of our votes are binding yet,
> we'll need 3 Jakarta PMC votes to pass, and that should help with getting a
> thorough review. Any chance you could review and cast a vote?
>
> ...ant
>
> On 3/27/07, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
>>
>> In my mailbox the start time of the vote is 8 minutes before you voted
>> (if
>> this is wrong please let
>> me know, but assuming this is correct) :
>>
>> How did you check the release in 8 minutes ? Even with a tool it's almost
>> impossible to do a
>> reasonable check in that time.
>>
>> Just making sure a release is actually checked before it goes out the
>> door
>> and if it is checked it
>> means that it is more likely to be *legally* ok.
>>
>> Mvgr,
>> Martin
>>
>> Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> > ant,
>> >
>> > thank you very much for all your *great* efforts!
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > ---rony
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ant elder wrote:
>> >> Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0-beta1 release.
>> >>
>> >> The source, binary, and maven artifacts are at:
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/
>> >>
>> >> The svn tag is at:
>> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-beta1/
>> >>
>> >> Here's my +1 (non-binding I believe)
>> >>
>> >> ...ant
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>
--
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
Director; Open Source Initiative; http://www.opensource.org/
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>.
Thanx for the clarification Ant..
Checking it was my intention, though you need a little patience, at the earliest I can free up some
time tomorrow to do the check.
Mvgr,
Martin
ant elder wrote:
> As this is my first time at a BSF and Jakarta release I'd actually put up
> the artifacts a while before I sent out the email to the dev list.
>
> I take your point though and as this is the 1st release towards BSF 3.0 I
> hope there is a thorough review. AIUI neither of our votes are binding yet,
> we'll need 3 Jakarta PMC votes to pass, and that should help with getting a
> thorough review. Any chance you could review and cast a vote?
>
> ...ant
>
> On 3/27/07, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
>>
>> In my mailbox the start time of the vote is 8 minutes before you voted
>> (if
>> this is wrong please let
>> me know, but assuming this is correct) :
>>
>> How did you check the release in 8 minutes ? Even with a tool it's almost
>> impossible to do a
>> reasonable check in that time.
>>
>> Just making sure a release is actually checked before it goes out the
>> door
>> and if it is checked it
>> means that it is more likely to be *legally* ok.
>>
>> Mvgr,
>> Martin
>>
>> Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> > ant,
>> >
>> > thank you very much for all your *great* efforts!
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > ---rony
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ant elder wrote:
>> >> Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0-beta1 release.
>> >>
>> >> The source, binary, and maven artifacts are at:
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/
>> >>
>> >> The svn tag is at:
>> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-beta1/
>> >>
>> >> Here's my +1 (non-binding I believe)
>> >>
>> >> ...ant
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
As this is my first time at a BSF and Jakarta release I'd actually put up
the artifacts a while before I sent out the email to the dev list.
I take your point though and as this is the 1st release towards BSF 3.0 I
hope there is a thorough review. AIUI neither of our votes are binding yet,
we'll need 3 Jakarta PMC votes to pass, and that should help with getting a
thorough review. Any chance you could review and cast a vote?
...ant
On 3/27/07, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
>
> In my mailbox the start time of the vote is 8 minutes before you voted (if
> this is wrong please let
> me know, but assuming this is correct) :
>
> How did you check the release in 8 minutes ? Even with a tool it's almost
> impossible to do a
> reasonable check in that time.
>
> Just making sure a release is actually checked before it goes out the door
> and if it is checked it
> means that it is more likely to be *legally* ok.
>
> Mvgr,
> Martin
>
> Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
> > ant,
> >
> > thank you very much for all your *great* efforts!
> >
> > +1
> >
> > ---rony
> >
> >
> >
> > ant elder wrote:
> >> Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0-beta1 release.
> >>
> >> The source, binary, and maven artifacts are at:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/
> >>
> >> The svn tag is at:
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-beta1/
> >>
> >> Here's my +1 (non-binding I believe)
> >>
> >> ...ant
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by "Rony G. Flatscher" <Ro...@wu-wien.ac.at>.
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
> In my mailbox the start time of the vote is 8 minutes before you voted (if this is wrong please let
> me know, but assuming this is correct) :
>
It is correct.
> How did you check the release in 8 minutes ? Even with a tool it's almost impossible to do a
> reasonable check in that time.
>
I did look at the code over the weekend that was immediately preceding
this drop. Studied the svn messages that followed afterwards and checked
whether the URLs were live, once ant announced the availability.
> Just making sure a release is actually checked before it goes out the door and if it is checked it
> means that it is more likely to be *legally* ok.
>
Hmm, sorry, I was not aware that I was supposed to check it out from the
repository and rebuild it myself. In what respect would you mean
"legally" ok? What can I do to help make the checkout o.k. (more legal)?
Please advise.
---rony
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>.
In my mailbox the start time of the vote is 8 minutes before you voted (if this is wrong please let
me know, but assuming this is correct) :
How did you check the release in 8 minutes ? Even with a tool it's almost impossible to do a
reasonable check in that time.
Just making sure a release is actually checked before it goes out the door and if it is checked it
means that it is more likely to be *legally* ok.
Mvgr,
Martin
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
> ant,
>
> thank you very much for all your *great* efforts!
>
> +1
>
> ---rony
>
>
>
> ant elder wrote:
>> Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0-beta1 release.
>>
>> The source, binary, and maven artifacts are at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/
>>
>> The svn tag is at:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-beta1/
>>
>> Here's my +1 (non-binding I believe)
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by "Rony G. Flatscher" <Ro...@wu-wien.ac.at>.
ant,
thank you very much for all your *great* efforts!
+1
---rony
ant elder wrote:
> Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0-beta1 release.
>
> The source, binary, and maven artifacts are at:
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/
>
> The svn tag is at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-beta1/
>
> Here's my +1 (non-binding I believe)
>
> ...ant
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
[RESULT] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Passed with binding +1s from Martin, Rony and Sanjiva, and 1 non-binding +1
from me.
Thanks for voting everyone! I'll publish it to the maven repositories now
and go look at how to get the website updated.
...ant
On 4/16/07, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk> wrote:
>
> +1 from me as well.
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > Any one else have a chance to review this yet?
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> > On 3/31/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm away on holiday now so wont be able to do much with this for a
> week.
> >> Would be nice to come back to find some more +1s ... :-)
> >>
> >> There's an svn tag for this beta1 so feel free to carry on work in the
> >> trunk.
> >>
> >> ...ant
> >>
> >> On 3/26/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0-beta1 release.
> >> >
> >> > The source, binary, and maven artifacts are at:
> >> >
> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > The svn tag is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/
> >> >
> >> bsf-3.0-beta1/<
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-beta1/>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Here's my +1 (non-binding I believe)
> >> >
> >> > ...ant
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
> Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/
> Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
> Director; Open Source Initiative; http://www.opensource.org/
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
> Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
+1 from me as well.
Sanjiva.
ant elder wrote:
> Any one else have a chance to review this yet?
>
> ...ant
>
> On 3/31/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm away on holiday now so wont be able to do much with this for a week.
>> Would be nice to come back to find some more +1s ... :-)
>>
>> There's an svn tag for this beta1 so feel free to carry on work in the
>> trunk.
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>> On 3/26/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0-beta1 release.
>> >
>> > The source, binary, and maven artifacts are at:
>> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/>
>>
>> >
>> > The svn tag is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/ bsf/tags/
>> >
>> bsf-3.0-beta1/<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-beta1/>
>>
>> >
>> > Here's my +1 (non-binding I believe)
>> >
>> > ...ant
>> >
>>
>>
>
--
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
Director; Open Source Initiative; http://www.opensource.org/
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>.
Sorry for holding up everything..
Looking good, so +1..
Mvgr,
Martin
ant elder wrote:
> Any one else have a chance to review this yet?
>
> ...ant
>
> On 3/31/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm away on holiday now so wont be able to do much with this for a week.
>> Would be nice to come back to find some more +1s ... :-)
>>
>> There's an svn tag for this beta1 so feel free to carry on work in the
>> trunk.
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>> On 3/26/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0-beta1 release.
>> >
>> > The source, binary, and maven artifacts are at:
>> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/>
>>
>> >
>> > The svn tag is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/ bsf/tags/
>> >
>> bsf-3.0-beta1/<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-beta1/>
>>
>> >
>> > Here's my +1 (non-binding I believe)
>> >
>> > ...ant
>> >
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Any one else have a chance to review this yet?
...ant
On 3/31/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm away on holiday now so wont be able to do much with this for a week.
> Would be nice to come back to find some more +1s ... :-)
>
> There's an svn tag for this beta1 so feel free to carry on work in the
> trunk.
>
> ...ant
>
> On 3/26/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0-beta1 release.
> >
> > The source, binary, and maven artifacts are at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/>
> >
> > The svn tag is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/ bsf/tags/
> > bsf-3.0-beta1/<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-beta1/>
> >
> > Here's my +1 (non-binding I believe)
> >
> > ...ant
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by "Rony G. Flatscher" <Ro...@wu-wien.ac.at>.
Hi ant,
ant elder wrote:
> I'm away on holiday now so wont be able to do much with this for a week.
> Would be nice to come back to find some more +1s ... :-)
+1 (re-inforced)
:-)
More when you are back...
---rony
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0-beta1
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
I'm away on holiday now so wont be able to do much with this for a week.
Would be nice to come back to find some more +1s ... :-)
There's an svn tag for this beta1 so feel free to carry on work in the
trunk.
...ant
On 3/26/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0-beta1 release.
>
> The source, binary, and maven artifacts are at:
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/bsf/3.0-beta1/>
>
> The svn tag is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf
> -3.0-beta1/
>
> Here's my +1 (non-binding I believe)
>
> ...ant
>