You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> on 2023/11/01 00:43:45 UTC
Re: [VOTE] October 2023 PR of the Month
+1 to 34729 from me as well. ð
Best,
Wei
> On Nov 1, 2023, at 4:02â¯AM, Aritra Basu <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 to 34729 from me as well. Great work on that
>
> --
> Regards,
> Aritra Basu
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023, 11:27â¯PM Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 for 34729 from me.
>>
>> Good work ð
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023, 21:40 Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 to 34729 as well.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 6:38â¯PM Constance Martineau
>>> <co...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh, I'm very sorry. I had forgotten about 34729. Apologies, but I'll be
>>>> changing my vote to that.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 1:08â¯PM Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I vote for 34729 <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34729>,
>> which
>>>>> implemented Airflow FileSystem.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 6:00â¯PM Jed Cunningham <
>>> jedcunningham@apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The new OpenSearch provider gets my vote - 34705.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Constance Martineau
>>>> Senior Product Manager
>>>>
>>>> Email: constance@astronomer.io
>>>> Time zone: US Eastern (EST UTC-5 / EDT UTC-4)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.astronomer.io/>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] October 2023 PR of the Month
Posted by Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com>.
Looks like we arrived at the edge case of one clear winner this time around
ð
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023, 20:40 Briana Okyere
<br...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> Thank you all!
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:23â¯AM Josh Fell <josh.d.fell@astronomer.io
> .invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Joining the party for 34279 as well!
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 8:22â¯AM Pierre Jeambrun <pi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 to 34729
> > >
> > > Le mer. 1 nov. 2023 Ã 06:47, Avi <abhishek.bhakat@astronomer.io.invalid
> >
> > a
> > > écrit :
> > >
> > > > +1 for 34729
> > > >
> > > > Reagrds,
> > > > Avi
> > > >
> > > > > On Wednesday, Nov 01, 2023 at 05:44, utkarsh sharma <
> > > > utkarsharma2@gmail.com (mailto:utkarsharma2@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > > +1 for 34729 :) great work on that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Utkarsh Sharma
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:34â¯AM Jed Cunningham <
> > > jedcunningham@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm slightly embarrassed I forgot about 34729, but yeah changing
> my
> > > > vote to
> > > > > > that as well. Now (at least so far) it's unanimous :)
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] October 2023 PR of the Month
Posted by Briana Okyere <br...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
Thank you all!
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:23â¯AM Josh Fell <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid>
wrote:
> Joining the party for 34279 as well!
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 8:22â¯AM Pierre Jeambrun <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 to 34729
> >
> > Le mer. 1 nov. 2023 Ã 06:47, Avi <ab...@astronomer.io.invalid>
> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > +1 for 34729
> > >
> > > Reagrds,
> > > Avi
> > >
> > > > On Wednesday, Nov 01, 2023 at 05:44, utkarsh sharma <
> > > utkarsharma2@gmail.com (mailto:utkarsharma2@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > +1 for 34729 :) great work on that.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Utkarsh Sharma
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:34â¯AM Jed Cunningham <
> > jedcunningham@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm slightly embarrassed I forgot about 34729, but yeah changing my
> > > vote to
> > > > > that as well. Now (at least so far) it's unanimous :)
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] October 2023 PR of the Month
Posted by Josh Fell <jo...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
Joining the party for 34279 as well!
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 8:22â¯AM Pierre Jeambrun <pi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 to 34729
>
> Le mer. 1 nov. 2023 Ã 06:47, Avi <ab...@astronomer.io.invalid> a
> écrit :
>
> > +1 for 34729
> >
> > Reagrds,
> > Avi
> >
> > > On Wednesday, Nov 01, 2023 at 05:44, utkarsh sharma <
> > utkarsharma2@gmail.com (mailto:utkarsharma2@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > +1 for 34729 :) great work on that.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Utkarsh Sharma
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:34â¯AM Jed Cunningham <
> jedcunningham@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm slightly embarrassed I forgot about 34729, but yeah changing my
> > vote to
> > > > that as well. Now (at least so far) it's unanimous :)
> > > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] October 2023 PR of the Month
Posted by Pierre Jeambrun <pi...@gmail.com>.
+1 to 34729
Le mer. 1 nov. 2023 Ã 06:47, Avi <ab...@astronomer.io.invalid> a
écrit :
> +1 for 34729
>
> Reagrds,
> Avi
>
> > On Wednesday, Nov 01, 2023 at 05:44, utkarsh sharma <
> utkarsharma2@gmail.com (mailto:utkarsharma2@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > +1 for 34729 :) great work on that.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Utkarsh Sharma
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:34â¯AM Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm slightly embarrassed I forgot about 34729, but yeah changing my
> vote to
> > > that as well. Now (at least so far) it's unanimous :)
> > >
>
Re: [VOTE] October 2023 PR of the Month
Posted by Avi <ab...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
+1 for 34729
Reagrds,
Avi
> On Wednesday, Nov 01, 2023 at 05:44, utkarsh sharma <utkarsharma2@gmail.com (mailto:utkarsharma2@gmail.com)> wrote:
> +1 for 34729 :) great work on that.
>
> Thanks,
> Utkarsh Sharma
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:34â¯AM Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm slightly embarrassed I forgot about 34729, but yeah changing my vote to
> > that as well. Now (at least so far) it's unanimous :)
> >
Re: [VOTE] October 2023 PR of the Month
Posted by utkarsh sharma <ut...@gmail.com>.
+1 for 34729 :) great work on that.
Thanks,
Utkarsh Sharma
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:34â¯AM Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org>
wrote:
> I'm slightly embarrassed I forgot about 34729, but yeah changing my vote to
> that as well. Now (at least so far) it's unanimous :)
>
Re: [VOTE] October 2023 PR of the Month
Posted by Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org>.
I'm slightly embarrassed I forgot about 34729, but yeah changing my vote to
that as well. Now (at least so far) it's unanimous :)