Spam, Block: Good to know my representative is spamming..

[Evan Platt <ev...@espphotography.com>]

Just received the below crap in from Anna Eshoo in my inbox.

Funny, I don't see a e-mail address on my representatives website. 
And there's no MX record for house.gov.
Header below, full SPAM at
http://www.espphotography.com/eshoo.html or
http://www.espphotography.com/eshoo.txt

Anna will definitely have some explaining to do if she wants my vote 
the next time she comes up for election.

Anyone have a e-mail address for representatives? Or a format? 
(flastname@domain.gov?)

Thanks.

Return-Path: <11...@lt05.net>
X-Original-To: evan@espphotography.com
Delivered-To: eplatt@espphotography.com
Received: from vmta-35.listrak.com (vtma-35.listrak.com [66.109.242.35])
	by espphotography.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0B4243730
	for <ev...@espphotography.com>; Wed,  9 Nov 2005 10:45:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vmta-35.listrak.com id he91s6067ncn; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 
13:45:10 -0500 (envelope-from <11...@lt05.net>)
From: "Rep. Anna Eshoo" <es...@mail.house.gov>
To: "evan@espphotography.com" <ev...@espphotography.com>
Reply-To: eshoonewsletter@mail.house.gov
Subject: News & Views, Fall 2005
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:45:05 -0500
Message-ID: <20...@t4>
X-Mailer: Listrak
X-Mailer-Server: T4
X-Mailer-Thread: 7
X-SMTP-Server: 192.168.1.233
X-Mailer-Reference: 11317-4025210-301012-30661
X-UMail: evan@espphotography.com
Errors-To: 11317@lt05.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="--=6AD0BE6FCB504120B5DD_10AF_92D6_2AD0"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on
	www.espphotography.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_00,DEAR_FRIEND,
	EXCUSE_10,HTML_MESSAGE,SARE_HEAD_HDR_XMAILTH,SARE_HEAD_HDR_XMLRSRV,
	SARE_HEAD_HDR_XSMTPSV,SARE_HEAD_HDR_XUMAIL,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL
	autolearn=no version=3.0.4
Status:   

Re: Spam, Block: Good to know my representative is spamming..

[Evan Platt <ev...@espphotography.com>]

At 12:52 PM 11/9/2005, you wrote:

>Woops, should have gone to Spam-L, the anti-spam list.
>
>But.. Good fodder to set up filters for. :)
>
>Evan


Just received quite a rude reply off list, which I did reply to, but 
I'm pretty confident the return address was false.

It was from a "Not Here" as the name.

The reply was simply (and quoted my "Received the below crap in my 
inbox" comment:

"So did I - from some idiot, who doesn't know how to post to a LIST!!!"

Well, not here - first off, my post was intended for SPAM-L, a 
anti-spam list. SPAM-L comes right after SpamAssassin in my address 
book. Honest mistake. I posted the above apology minutes after 
realizing my mistake.

Second off, I'm guessin you were commenting that I was the idiot.

I believe YOU are the idiot (nameless, nonetheless) because you 
DIDN'T receive the spam from me. If you knew how to read, I ONLY 
included the headers.

I cannot locate who this person is, searching on a number of headers, 
but I have their IP information from the e-mail.

Granted, I'm taking it with a very small grain of salt, based on the 
fact that the person doesn't even have the guts to use their name.

Perhaps a simple IQ test prior to allowing people to join this list 
would eliminate these types of people from joining? 

Re: Spam, Block: Good to know my representative is spamming..

[Evan Platt <ev...@espphotography.com>]

At 12:34 PM 11/9/2005, you wrote:
>Just received the below crap in from Anna Eshoo in my inbox.


Woops, should have gone to Spam-L, the anti-spam list.

But.. Good fodder to set up filters for. :)

Evan