You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@apr.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2023/03/02 17:42:17 UTC

[Bug 66457] testatomic: Line 908: Unexpected value

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66457

--- Comment #7 from Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com> ---
Lubos, I made some changes in r1907988 to possibly enable atomic builtins on
i586 and i686 (gcc for instance provides them for these cpus), and since you
are using -march=i686 I wonder if it's a suitable change for you or if
-march=i686 should mean --enable-nonportable-atomics=no like before for your
(and/or redhat's) case.
Since a real i686 cpu is quite unlikely to be used/found these days, what's the
point of -march=i686 (wouldn't only -m32 be enough)?
Some thoughts/opinions about this change?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@apr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@apr.apache.org