svn commit: r1145134 - /lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene/contrib/grouping/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/grouping/package.html

[ko...@apache.org]

Author: koji
Date: Mon Jul 11 12:08:07 2011
New Revision: 1145134

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1145134&view=rev
Log:
fix javadoc

Modified:
    lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene/contrib/grouping/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/grouping/package.html

Modified: lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene/contrib/grouping/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/grouping/package.html
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene/contrib/grouping/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/grouping/package.html?rev=1145134&r1=1145133&r2=1145134&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene/contrib/grouping/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/grouping/package.html (original)
+++ lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene/contrib/grouping/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/grouping/package.html Mon Jul 11 12:08:07 2011
@@ -61,12 +61,6 @@ field fall into a single group.</p>
   collectors that for example group on multiple fields.
 </p>
 
-<p>
-  This module abstracts away what defines group and how it is collected. All grouping collectors
-  are abstract and have currently term based implementations. One can implement
-  collectors that for example group on multiple fields.
-</p>
-
 <p>Known limitations:</p>
 <ul>
   <li> For the two-pass grouping collector, the group field must be a
@@ -90,7 +84,7 @@ field fall into a single group.</p>
   CachingCollector cachedCollector = CachingCollector.create(c1, cacheScores, maxCacheRAMMB);
   s.search(new TermQuery(new Term("content", searchTerm)), cachedCollector);
 
-  Collection<SearchGroup<BytesRef>> topGroups = c1.getTopGroups(groupOffset, fillFields);
+  Collection&lt;SearchGroup&lt;BytesRef&gt;&gt; topGroups = c1.getTopGroups(groupOffset, fillFields);
 
   if (topGroups == null) {
     // No groups matched
@@ -117,9 +111,9 @@ field fall into a single group.</p>
     s.search(new TermQuery(new Term("content", searchTerm)), c2);
   }
 
-  TopGroups<BytesRef> groupsResult = c2.getTopGroups(docOffset);
+  TopGroups&lt;BytesRef&gt; groupsResult = c2.getTopGroups(docOffset);
   if (requiredTotalGroupCount) {
-    groupResult = new TopGroups<BytesRef>(groupsResult, allGroupsCollector.getGroupCount());
+    groupsResult = new TopGroups&lt;BytesRef&gt;(groupsResult, allGroupsCollector.getGroupCount());
   }
 
   // Render groupsResult...