You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@creadur.apache.org by Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com> on 2008/06/20 18:02:41 UTC
[RAT-8] and [RAT-28]
Is it correct to say that mvn reports that want the
former (default GeneratedLicenseNotRequired) are
blocked on the latter (repackaging the plugin)?
Thanks,
Matt
P.S. the "subscribe" link on the mailing lists page
points to "unsubscribe".
Re: [RAT-8] and [RAT-28]
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com>.
--- Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Matt Benson
> <gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I can't find any documentation on that parameter,
> or
> > any other really, at
> >
> http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/index.html
> .
> > Is there somewhere else I should be looking?
>
> How about clicking on "goals" and next on the
> desired goal, for example rat:rat?
>
Thank you! My perennial Maven-challengedness
manifested as blindness in my inability to recognize
"goals" as representing "Maven goals" as opposed to
the more abstract concept of project/development
goals. :) Silly, but apparently that's what happens.
-Matt
>
> --
> Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that
> you think before
> you break 'em.
>
> -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
>
Re: [RAT-8] and [RAT-28]
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I can't find any documentation on that parameter, or
> any other really, at
> http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/index.html .
> Is there somewhere else I should be looking?
How about clicking on "goals" and next on the desired goal, for example rat:rat?
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
Re: [RAT-8] and [RAT-28]
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com>.
--- Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Matt Benson
> <gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Okay, I'll try to say it another way. :) I'm
> running
> > RAT reports via mvn and want JavaCC-generated
> files to
> > be ignored. What is the status of plugin
> releases?
> > i.e., is there a release that contains the change
> from
> > RAT-8, is such a release forthcoming, or am I
> simply
> > SOL?
>
> The rat-maven-plugin contained an "excludes"
> parameter right from the
> start. That's why (IMO) RAT-8 is superfluous.
I can't find any documentation on that parameter, or
any other really, at
http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/index.html .
Is there somewhere else I should be looking?
-Matt
>
> Jochen
>
>
> --
> Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that
> you think before
> you break 'em.
>
> -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
>
Re: [RAT-8] and [RAT-28]
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Okay, I'll try to say it another way. :) I'm running
> RAT reports via mvn and want JavaCC-generated files to
> be ignored. What is the status of plugin releases?
> i.e., is there a release that contains the change from
> RAT-8, is such a release forthcoming, or am I simply
> SOL?
The rat-maven-plugin contained an "excludes" parameter right from the
start. That's why (IMO) RAT-8 is superfluous.
Jochen
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
Re: [RAT-8] and [RAT-28]
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com>.
--- Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Matt Benson
> <gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Is it correct to say that mvn reports that want
> the
> > former (default GeneratedLicenseNotRequired) are
> > blocked on the latter (repackaging the plugin)?
>
> I must admit that I haven't got any clue what you
> are asking, although
> I am the plugins author...
>
Okay, I'll try to say it another way. :) I'm running
RAT reports via mvn and want JavaCC-generated files to
be ignored. What is the status of plugin releases?
i.e., is there a release that contains the change from
RAT-8, is such a release forthcoming, or am I simply
SOL?
Thanks,
Matt
>
> --
> Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that
> you think before
> you break 'em.
>
> -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
>
Re: [RAT-8] and [RAT-28]
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Is it correct to say that mvn reports that want the
> former (default GeneratedLicenseNotRequired) are
> blocked on the latter (repackaging the plugin)?
I must admit that I haven't got any clue what you are asking, although
I am the plugins author...
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)