You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Robert Scholte (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/08/02 19:41:20 UTC
[jira] [Closed] (MPLUGIN-305) MojoAnnotationsScanner should have
better control over dependency scanning
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGIN-305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Robert Scholte closed MPLUGIN-305.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Robert Scholte
Fix Version/s: 3.5
Fixed in [r1754998|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1754998&view=rev] by introducing a new parameter: mojoDependencies.
- not specified ( = null; default ) scan all dependencies
- {{<mojoDependencies/>}} , empty list, scan nothing.
- {{<mojoDependencies><mojoDependency>groupId:artifactId</mojoDependency><mojoDependencies>}}, scan only groupId:artifactId dependency.
> MojoAnnotationsScanner should have better control over dependency scanning
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MPLUGIN-305
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGIN-305
> Project: Maven Plugin Tools
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: maven-plugin-tools-annotations
> Reporter: Robert Scholte
> Assignee: Robert Scholte
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.5
>
>
> Currently MojoAnnotationsScanner always scans all dependencies in search for Mojo's. However, most of the time there's no need to do so: the sources are all the mojo's for the plugin.
> The simple solution would be to specify if the plugin should scan, and maybe even which dependencies.
> A more elegant way would be to analyze the source-classes. If the Mojo's extend known classes like AbstractMojo, there's no need to scan at all.
> ps. plugins which require dependencies-scanning are the maven-surefire-plugin and maven-failsafe-plugin
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)