You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Nico Kruber (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/10/09 15:46:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-10468) Potential missing break for
PARTITION_CUSTOM in OutputEmitter ctor
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16643653#comment-16643653 ]
Nico Kruber commented on FLINK-10468:
-------------------------------------
I'd agree with [~Tison] after looking at the code.
However, several parts in this class seem a bit too defensive, like this one:
{code}
private int[] customPartition(T record, int numberOfChannels) {
if (channels == null) {
channels = new int[1];
extractedKeys = new Object[1];
}
{code}
-> this can only be called for {{PARTITION_CUSTOM}} and for this, we made sure that these two properties are set. But maybe I'm wrong here - at least, I wouldn't touch it unless it is actually needed.
> Potential missing break for PARTITION_CUSTOM in OutputEmitter ctor
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-10468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10468
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ted Yu
> Priority: Minor
>
> Here is related code:
> {code}
> switch (strategy) {
> case PARTITION_CUSTOM:
> extractedKeys = new Object[1];
> case FORWARD:
> {code}
> It seems a 'break' is missing prior to FORWARD case.
> {code}
> if (strategy == ShipStrategyType.PARTITION_CUSTOM && partitioner == null) {
> throw new NullPointerException("Partitioner must not be null when the ship strategy is set to custom partitioning.");
> }
> {code}
> Since the above check is for PARTITION_CUSTOM, it seems we can place the check in the switch statement.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)