Re: Review Request 55321: Introduced process::after.

[Benjamin Mahler <bm...@apache.org>]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55321/#review163778
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Nice to have! I wonder if we still want delay long term:

```
delay(self(), &Self::continuation);

// vs

after(Seconds(5))
  .then(defer(self(), &Self::continuation))
```


3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/after.hpp (lines 16 - 20)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55321/#comment235279>

    Looks like you need:
    
    <memory>
    
    <stout/nothing.hpp>



3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/after_tests.cpp (line 34)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55321/#comment235280>

    How about `Milliseconds(1)` like you did below since there doesn't seem to be any need for a specific duration and we don't want to slow down the test. 1 nanosecond also seems to be sufficient for this test?


- Benjamin Mahler


On Jan. 8, 2017, 7:49 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/55321/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 8, 2017, 7:49 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Introduced process::after.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/Makefile.am 5e7fdd06ccbed50f248c81e9df1651a3702e7add 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/Makefile.am 1d17edd933562849b35740f3935685c8eb154440 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/after.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/after_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55321/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>