You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "Trevor Pounds (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/06/17 17:51:00 UTC
[jira] Created: (AMQ-1804) ConnectionFactory classes shuld have
XBean support
ConnectionFactory classes shuld have XBean support
--------------------------------------------------
Key: AMQ-1804
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 5.1.0, 4.1.2
Reporter: Trevor Pounds
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 4.1.3, 5.2.0
It would be nice to have certain objects deriving from javax.jms.ConnectionFactory to provide XBean binding support. This would really clean up xbean configurations utilizing ActiveMQ connection factories.
{code:xml|title=current}
<bean id="pooledFactory" class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory" destroy-method="stop">
<property name="connectionFactory">
<bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory">
<property name="brokerURL">
<value>tcp://localhost:61616</value>
</property>
</bean>
</property>
</bean>
{code}
vs
{code:xml|title=improved}
<pooledConnectionFactory id="pooledFactory" destroy-method="stop" connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"/>
<connectionFactory id="connectionFactory" brokerURL="tcp://localhost:61616"/>
{code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Reopened: (AMQ-1804) ConnectionFactory classes should have
XBean support
Posted by "Trevor Pounds (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Trevor Pounds reopened AMQ-1804:
--------------------------------
Reopening ticket due to xbean name mapping conflict that may cause problems for some users. I propose either removing the xbean mapping from the org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConectionFactory class or removing the org.apache.activemq.spring.ActiveMQConnectionFactory class. Do we need both of these classes?
> ConnectionFactory classes should have XBean support
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-1804
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 5.1.0
> Reporter: Trevor Pounds
> Assignee: Rob Davies
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.2.0
>
> Attachments: r669289.diff
>
>
> It would be nice to have certain objects deriving from javax.jms.ConnectionFactory to provide XBean binding support. This would really clean up xbean configurations utilizing ActiveMQ connection factories.
> {code:xml|title=current}
> <bean id="pooledFactory" class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory" destroy-method="stop">
> <property name="connectionFactory">
> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory">
> <property name="brokerURL">
> <value>tcp://localhost:61616</value>
> </property>
> </bean>
> </property>
> </bean>
> {code}
> vs
> {code:xml|title=improved}
> <pooledConnectionFactory id="pooledFactory" destroy-method="stop" connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"/>
> <connectionFactory id="connectionFactory" brokerURL="tcp://localhost:61616"/>
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (AMQ-1804) ConnectionFactory classes should have
XBean support
Posted by "Trevor Pounds (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Trevor Pounds updated AMQ-1804:
-------------------------------
Summary: ConnectionFactory classes should have XBean support (was: ConnectionFactory classes shuld have XBean support)
> ConnectionFactory classes should have XBean support
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-1804
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 5.1.0
> Reporter: Trevor Pounds
> Assignee: Rob Davies
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.2.0
>
> Attachments: r669289.diff
>
>
> It would be nice to have certain objects deriving from javax.jms.ConnectionFactory to provide XBean binding support. This would really clean up xbean configurations utilizing ActiveMQ connection factories.
> {code:xml|title=current}
> <bean id="pooledFactory" class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory" destroy-method="stop">
> <property name="connectionFactory">
> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory">
> <property name="brokerURL">
> <value>tcp://localhost:61616</value>
> </property>
> </bean>
> </property>
> </bean>
> {code}
> vs
> {code:xml|title=improved}
> <pooledConnectionFactory id="pooledFactory" destroy-method="stop" connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"/>
> <connectionFactory id="connectionFactory" brokerURL="tcp://localhost:61616"/>
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1804) ConnectionFactory classes shuld have
XBean support
Posted by "Trevor Pounds (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=43568#action_43568 ]
Trevor Pounds commented on AMQ-1804:
------------------------------------
I see this has already been done for the ActiveMQConnectionFactory. This really only needs to be done for the PooledConnectionFactory object.
> ConnectionFactory classes shuld have XBean support
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-1804
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 5.1.0
> Reporter: Trevor Pounds
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.1.3, 5.2.0
>
>
> It would be nice to have certain objects deriving from javax.jms.ConnectionFactory to provide XBean binding support. This would really clean up xbean configurations utilizing ActiveMQ connection factories.
> {code:xml|title=current}
> <bean id="pooledFactory" class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory" destroy-method="stop">
> <property name="connectionFactory">
> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory">
> <property name="brokerURL">
> <value>tcp://localhost:61616</value>
> </property>
> </bean>
> </property>
> </bean>
> {code}
> vs
> {code:xml|title=improved}
> <pooledConnectionFactory id="pooledFactory" destroy-method="stop" connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"/>
> <connectionFactory id="connectionFactory" brokerURL="tcp://localhost:61616"/>
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (AMQ-1804) ConnectionFactory classes
shuld have XBean support
Posted by "Trevor Pounds (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=43568#action_43568 ]
tpounds edited comment on AMQ-1804 at 6/18/08 1:52 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
I see this has already been done for the ActiveMQConnectionFactory. This really only needs to be done for the PooledConnectionFactory class. I will try to provide a patch for this ASAP.
was (Author: tpounds):
I see this has already been done for the ActiveMQConnectionFactory. This really only needs to be done for the PooledConnectionFactory object.
> ConnectionFactory classes shuld have XBean support
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-1804
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 5.1.0
> Reporter: Trevor Pounds
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.1.3, 5.2.0
>
>
> It would be nice to have certain objects deriving from javax.jms.ConnectionFactory to provide XBean binding support. This would really clean up xbean configurations utilizing ActiveMQ connection factories.
> {code:xml|title=current}
> <bean id="pooledFactory" class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory" destroy-method="stop">
> <property name="connectionFactory">
> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory">
> <property name="brokerURL">
> <value>tcp://localhost:61616</value>
> </property>
> </bean>
> </property>
> </bean>
> {code}
> vs
> {code:xml|title=improved}
> <pooledConnectionFactory id="pooledFactory" destroy-method="stop" connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"/>
> <connectionFactory id="connectionFactory" brokerURL="tcp://localhost:61616"/>
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (AMQ-1804) ConnectionFactory classes shuld have
XBean support
Posted by "Rob Davies (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Rob Davies reassigned AMQ-1804:
-------------------------------
Assignee: Rob Davies
> ConnectionFactory classes shuld have XBean support
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-1804
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 5.1.0
> Reporter: Trevor Pounds
> Assignee: Rob Davies
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.2.0
>
> Attachments: r669289.diff
>
>
> It would be nice to have certain objects deriving from javax.jms.ConnectionFactory to provide XBean binding support. This would really clean up xbean configurations utilizing ActiveMQ connection factories.
> {code:xml|title=current}
> <bean id="pooledFactory" class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory" destroy-method="stop">
> <property name="connectionFactory">
> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory">
> <property name="brokerURL">
> <value>tcp://localhost:61616</value>
> </property>
> </bean>
> </property>
> </bean>
> {code}
> vs
> {code:xml|title=improved}
> <pooledConnectionFactory id="pooledFactory" destroy-method="stop" connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"/>
> <connectionFactory id="connectionFactory" brokerURL="tcp://localhost:61616"/>
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (AMQ-1804) ConnectionFactory classes should have
XBean support
Posted by "Gary Tully (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Gary Tully updated AMQ-1804:
----------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.3.0
(was: 5.2.0)
> ConnectionFactory classes should have XBean support
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-1804
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 5.1.0
> Reporter: Trevor Pounds
> Assignee: Rob Davies
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.3.0
>
> Attachments: r669289.diff
>
>
> It would be nice to have certain objects deriving from javax.jms.ConnectionFactory to provide XBean binding support. This would really clean up xbean configurations utilizing ActiveMQ connection factories.
> {code:xml|title=current}
> <bean id="pooledFactory" class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory" destroy-method="stop">
> <property name="connectionFactory">
> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory">
> <property name="brokerURL">
> <value>tcp://localhost:61616</value>
> </property>
> </bean>
> </property>
> </bean>
> {code}
> vs
> {code:xml|title=improved}
> <pooledConnectionFactory id="pooledFactory" destroy-method="stop" connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"/>
> <connectionFactory id="connectionFactory" brokerURL="tcp://localhost:61616"/>
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (AMQ-1804) ConnectionFactory classes shuld have
XBean support
Posted by "Trevor Pounds (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Trevor Pounds updated AMQ-1804:
-------------------------------
Attachment: r669289.diff
Attaching simple patch to provide xbean support for PooledConnectionFactory class
> ConnectionFactory classes shuld have XBean support
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-1804
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 5.1.0
> Reporter: Trevor Pounds
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.1.3, 5.2.0
>
> Attachments: r669289.diff
>
>
> It would be nice to have certain objects deriving from javax.jms.ConnectionFactory to provide XBean binding support. This would really clean up xbean configurations utilizing ActiveMQ connection factories.
> {code:xml|title=current}
> <bean id="pooledFactory" class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory" destroy-method="stop">
> <property name="connectionFactory">
> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory">
> <property name="brokerURL">
> <value>tcp://localhost:61616</value>
> </property>
> </bean>
> </property>
> </bean>
> {code}
> vs
> {code:xml|title=improved}
> <pooledConnectionFactory id="pooledFactory" destroy-method="stop" connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"/>
> <connectionFactory id="connectionFactory" brokerURL="tcp://localhost:61616"/>
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1804) ConnectionFactory classes shuld have
XBean support
Posted by "Trevor Pounds (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=43609#action_43609 ]
Trevor Pounds commented on AMQ-1804:
------------------------------------
Rob, I noticed that the org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory class already has an XBean configuration (with the same element name) in the class org.apache.activemq.spring.ActiveMQConnectionFactory, albeit with a bit more configuration that supports Spring directly. This may produce undesired results in the future in some configurations (i.e. classloading similar to something that happened in AMQ-1345).
> ConnectionFactory classes shuld have XBean support
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-1804
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 5.1.0
> Reporter: Trevor Pounds
> Assignee: Rob Davies
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.2.0
>
> Attachments: r669289.diff
>
>
> It would be nice to have certain objects deriving from javax.jms.ConnectionFactory to provide XBean binding support. This would really clean up xbean configurations utilizing ActiveMQ connection factories.
> {code:xml|title=current}
> <bean id="pooledFactory" class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory" destroy-method="stop">
> <property name="connectionFactory">
> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory">
> <property name="brokerURL">
> <value>tcp://localhost:61616</value>
> </property>
> </bean>
> </property>
> </bean>
> {code}
> vs
> {code:xml|title=improved}
> <pooledConnectionFactory id="pooledFactory" destroy-method="stop" connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"/>
> <connectionFactory id="connectionFactory" brokerURL="tcp://localhost:61616"/>
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (AMQ-1804) ConnectionFactory classes shuld have
XBean support
Posted by "Rob Davies (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Rob Davies resolved AMQ-1804.
-----------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.3)
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed by SVN revision 669558 and 669555
We currently don't have plans for a 4.1.3 release
> ConnectionFactory classes shuld have XBean support
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-1804
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 5.1.0
> Reporter: Trevor Pounds
> Assignee: Rob Davies
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.2.0
>
> Attachments: r669289.diff
>
>
> It would be nice to have certain objects deriving from javax.jms.ConnectionFactory to provide XBean binding support. This would really clean up xbean configurations utilizing ActiveMQ connection factories.
> {code:xml|title=current}
> <bean id="pooledFactory" class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory" destroy-method="stop">
> <property name="connectionFactory">
> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory">
> <property name="brokerURL">
> <value>tcp://localhost:61616</value>
> </property>
> </bean>
> </property>
> </bean>
> {code}
> vs
> {code:xml|title=improved}
> <pooledConnectionFactory id="pooledFactory" destroy-method="stop" connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"/>
> <connectionFactory id="connectionFactory" brokerURL="tcp://localhost:61616"/>
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (AMQ-1804) ConnectionFactory classes should have
XBean support
Posted by "Dejan Bosanac (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Dejan Bosanac resolved AMQ-1804.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Removed xbean mapping from org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConectionFactory in SVN revision 792884
> ConnectionFactory classes should have XBean support
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-1804
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 5.1.0
> Reporter: Trevor Pounds
> Assignee: Rob Davies
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.3.0
>
> Attachments: r669289.diff
>
>
> It would be nice to have certain objects deriving from javax.jms.ConnectionFactory to provide XBean binding support. This would really clean up xbean configurations utilizing ActiveMQ connection factories.
> {code:xml|title=current}
> <bean id="pooledFactory" class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory" destroy-method="stop">
> <property name="connectionFactory">
> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory">
> <property name="brokerURL">
> <value>tcp://localhost:61616</value>
> </property>
> </bean>
> </property>
> </bean>
> {code}
> vs
> {code:xml|title=improved}
> <pooledConnectionFactory id="pooledFactory" destroy-method="stop" connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"/>
> <connectionFactory id="connectionFactory" brokerURL="tcp://localhost:61616"/>
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.