You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@river.apache.org by John Sarman <jo...@gmail.com> on 2007/01/14 15:12:02 UTC

Quick Question

Will the net.jini packages be refactored to org.apache.river ?

Thanks
  John Sarman

Re: Quick Question

Posted by Jim Hurley <Ji...@Sun.COM>.

Hi John-

At least right now (since "Jini" is still a trademarked term),
I don't see the instantiation of Apache River changing any
policies about allowing "jini" to be in the name of a project.

Why do you ask?  Is there a project (at Java.net?) that you
hope to start with "jini" in the name?

-Jim

On Jan 14, 2007, at 1:42 PM, John Sarman wrote:
> Thanks.
> Also the original jini.org policy was to not allow any project that  
> had jini
> in the name be accepted.  How will this policy be effected by the  
> move to
> apache?
>
>
> John Sarman
>
> On 1/14/07, Bob Scheifler <Bo...@sun.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Will the net.jini packages be refactored to org.apache.river ?
>>
>> Our intent is to leave them as net.jini.
>>
>> - Bob
>>

Re: Quick Question

Posted by Jeff Ramsdale <je...@gmail.com>.

There was a decision sometime back to allow projects to continue to
use the org.jini prefix for their package names if they registered at
<http://www.jini.org/wiki/Project_Registry>, though evidently the
word's not gotten around too much given the short list. net.jini, as
always, remains exclusive to the Specs and their implementors.

Jeff

On 1/14/07, John Sarman <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks.
> Also the original jini.org policy was to not allow any project that had jini
> in the name be accepted.  How will this policy be effected by the move to
> apache?
>
>
> John Sarman
>
> On 1/14/07, Bob Scheifler <Bo...@sun.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Will the net.jini packages be refactored to org.apache.river ?
> >
> > Our intent is to leave them as net.jini.
> >
> > - Bob
> >
>
>

Re: Quick Question

Posted by John Sarman <jo...@gmail.com>.

Thanks.
Also the original jini.org policy was to not allow any project that had jini
in the name be accepted.  How will this policy be effected by the move to
apache?

John Sarman

On 1/14/07, Bob Scheifler <Bo...@sun.com> wrote:
>
> > Will the net.jini packages be refactored to org.apache.river ?
>
> Our intent is to leave them as net.jini.
>
> - Bob
>

Re: Quick Question

Posted by Bob Scheifler <Bo...@Sun.COM>.

> Will the net.jini packages be refactored to org.apache.river ?

Our intent is to leave them as net.jini.

- Bob