You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> on 2005/10/18 16:10:12 UTC
Time for RC3?
There have been a few more changes to the branch lately. What do
people think about pushing out an RC3 and then an official release
shortly thereafter? Should we get the ball rolling on the RC3? I'm
+1 as long as there as people have tested RC2 for the basics.
Right now I'm trying to keep my head above water with work, side
consulting, personal life and open source. I think I can find time to
do the build if we can get a consensus.
sean
Re: Time for RC3?
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 from my side
Manfred
2005/10/18, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
>
> There have been a few more changes to the branch lately. What do
> people think about pushing out an RC3 and then an official release
> shortly thereafter? Should we get the ball rolling on the RC3? I'm
> +1 as long as there as people have tested RC2 for the basics.
>
> Right now I'm trying to keep my head above water with work, side
> consulting, personal life and open source. I think I can find time to
> do the build if we can get a consensus.
>
> sean
>
Re: Time for RC3?
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
RC3 is up and ready for testing. Martin, can you send the relevant
announcements (including announce list)?
sean
On 10/18/05, Simon Kitching <sk...@obsidium.com> wrote:
> Sean Schofield wrote:
> > There have been a few more changes to the branch lately. What do
> > people think about pushing out an RC3 and then an official release
> > shortly thereafter? Should we get the ball rolling on the RC3? I'm
> > +1 as long as there as people have tested RC2 for the basics.
> >
> > Right now I'm trying to keep my head above water with work, side
> > consulting, personal life and open source. I think I can find time to
> > do the build if we can get a consensus.
> >
>
> I filed this JIRA issue recently:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-700
>
> I marked it as BLOCKER because I do believe this *must* be fixed before
> a new myfaces release is made. It's new code which changes behaviour
> since the previous release.
>
> I'll try to find time to put together a patch to restore the old
> behaviour but I'm really under pressue with a project at the moment and
> it's hard to find time to learn how to build and unit-test myfaces.
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon
>
Re: Time for RC3?
Posted by Simon Kitching <sk...@obsidium.com>.
Sean Schofield wrote:
> There have been a few more changes to the branch lately. What do
> people think about pushing out an RC3 and then an official release
> shortly thereafter? Should we get the ball rolling on the RC3? I'm
> +1 as long as there as people have tested RC2 for the basics.
>
> Right now I'm trying to keep my head above water with work, side
> consulting, personal life and open source. I think I can find time to
> do the build if we can get a consensus.
>
I filed this JIRA issue recently:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-700
I marked it as BLOCKER because I do believe this *must* be fixed before
a new myfaces release is made. It's new code which changes behaviour
since the previous release.
I'll try to find time to put together a patch to restore the old
behaviour but I'm really under pressue with a project at the moment and
it's hard to find time to learn how to build and unit-test myfaces.
Regards,
Simon
Re: Time for RC3?
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
> I made the change.
OK building now ...
> I like the idea of changing the build so that the extension can be
> set by ant command line.
>
> We can also manually change the RC3 build to 1.1.1 if we decide to do
> that right?
What do you mean by change the RC3 build? Do you mean the extension?
Yes we could manually change that ... as long as the manifest, etc.
say 1.1.1 and not RC3.
> --bd-
sean
Re: Time for RC3?
Posted by Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com>.
Hi Sean,
Sorry to not respond to the idea. I was in a hurry to get the change
done and only read that I left RC2 in the build and just now came
back to the email.
I made the change.
I like the idea of changing the build so that the extension can be
set by ant command line.
We can also manually change the RC3 build to 1.1.1 if we decide to do
that right?
TTFN,
--bd-
On Oct 18, 2005, at 2:49 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
> What about my idea?
>
> sean
>
> On 10/18/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> dooh, forgot to update the manifest properties file
>>
>> doing that now
>>
>> ttfn -bd-
>>
>> On Oct 18, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Unfortunately this is building as RC2 in the filename, etc. Can you
>>> update the version in the props files, etc?
>>>
>>> Suggestion: We leave it as 1.1.1 and manually (for now) add RC3
>>> to the
>>> resulting bundles. This way the same EXACT build can be retagged as
>>> final if we vote +1. Make sense?
>>>
>>> Sometime in the near future I will add a tweak to the build so that
>>> you can optionally add the suffix through ant.
>>>
>>> sean
>>>
>>> On 10/18/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Sean,
>>>>
>>>> The tag should be done.
>>>>
>>>> TTFN,
>>>>
>>>> -bd-
>>>> On Oct 18, 2005, at 10:36 AM, Sean Schofield wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Bill,
>>>>>
>>>>> I will take you up on your offer. Go ahead with the
>>>>> branching/tagging. I will try to build later today or tomorrow
>>>>> at the
>>>>> latest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sean
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/18/05, Mathias Brökelmann <mb...@googlemail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2005/10/18, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/18/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 from me too
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd be glad to help with the branch/tag stuff if you could
>>>>>>>> do the
>>>>>>>> build Sean.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TTFN,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -bd-
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 18, 2005, at 8:27 AM, Werner Punz wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sean Schofield wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There have been a few more changes to the branch lately.
>>>>>>>>>> What do
>>>>>>>>>> people think about pushing out an RC3 and then an official
>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>> shortly thereafter? Should we get the ball rolling on the
>>>>>>>>>> RC3? I'm
>>>>>>>>>> +1 as long as there as people have tested RC2 for the basics.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Right now I'm trying to keep my head above water with work,
>>>>>>>>>> side
>>>>>>>>>> consulting, personal life and open source. I think I can
>>>>>>>>>> find
>>>>>>>>>> time to
>>>>>>>>>> do the build if we can get a consensus.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> sean
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 give it a shot...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.irian.at
>>>>>>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>>>>>>> JSF Trainings in English and German
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Mathias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Time for RC3?
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
What about my idea?
sean
On 10/18/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
> dooh, forgot to update the manifest properties file
>
> doing that now
>
> ttfn -bd-
>
> On Oct 18, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately this is building as RC2 in the filename, etc. Can you
> > update the version in the props files, etc?
> >
> > Suggestion: We leave it as 1.1.1 and manually (for now) add RC3 to the
> > resulting bundles. This way the same EXACT build can be retagged as
> > final if we vote +1. Make sense?
> >
> > Sometime in the near future I will add a tweak to the build so that
> > you can optionally add the suffix through ant.
> >
> > sean
> >
> > On 10/18/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Sean,
> >>
> >> The tag should be done.
> >>
> >> TTFN,
> >>
> >> -bd-
> >> On Oct 18, 2005, at 10:36 AM, Sean Schofield wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Bill,
> >>>
> >>> I will take you up on your offer. Go ahead with the
> >>> branching/tagging. I will try to build later today or tomorrow
> >>> at the
> >>> latest.
> >>>
> >>> Sean
> >>>
> >>> On 10/18/05, Mathias Brökelmann <mb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> 2005/10/18, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Martin
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 10/18/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 from me too
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'd be glad to help with the branch/tag stuff if you could do the
> >>>>>> build Sean.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> TTFN,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -bd-
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Oct 18, 2005, at 8:27 AM, Werner Punz wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sean Schofield wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There have been a few more changes to the branch lately.
> >>>>>>>> What do
> >>>>>>>> people think about pushing out an RC3 and then an official
> >>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>> shortly thereafter? Should we get the ball rolling on the
> >>>>>>>> RC3? I'm
> >>>>>>>> +1 as long as there as people have tested RC2 for the basics.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Right now I'm trying to keep my head above water with work,
> >>>>>>>> side
> >>>>>>>> consulting, personal life and open source. I think I can find
> >>>>>>>> time to
> >>>>>>>> do the build if we can get a consensus.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> sean
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 give it a shot...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.irian.at
> >>>>> Your JSF powerhouse -
> >>>>> JSF Trainings in English and German
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Mathias
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: Time for RC3?
Posted by Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com>.
dooh, forgot to update the manifest properties file
doing that now
ttfn -bd-
On Oct 18, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
> Unfortunately this is building as RC2 in the filename, etc. Can you
> update the version in the props files, etc?
>
> Suggestion: We leave it as 1.1.1 and manually (for now) add RC3 to the
> resulting bundles. This way the same EXACT build can be retagged as
> final if we vote +1. Make sense?
>
> Sometime in the near future I will add a tweak to the build so that
> you can optionally add the suffix through ant.
>
> sean
>
> On 10/18/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>> The tag should be done.
>>
>> TTFN,
>>
>> -bd-
>> On Oct 18, 2005, at 10:36 AM, Sean Schofield wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Bill,
>>>
>>> I will take you up on your offer. Go ahead with the
>>> branching/tagging. I will try to build later today or tomorrow
>>> at the
>>> latest.
>>>
>>> Sean
>>>
>>> On 10/18/05, Mathias Brökelmann <mb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> 2005/10/18, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/18/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 from me too
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd be glad to help with the branch/tag stuff if you could do the
>>>>>> build Sean.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TTFN,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -bd-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 18, 2005, at 8:27 AM, Werner Punz wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sean Schofield wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There have been a few more changes to the branch lately.
>>>>>>>> What do
>>>>>>>> people think about pushing out an RC3 and then an official
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> shortly thereafter? Should we get the ball rolling on the
>>>>>>>> RC3? I'm
>>>>>>>> +1 as long as there as people have tested RC2 for the basics.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Right now I'm trying to keep my head above water with work,
>>>>>>>> side
>>>>>>>> consulting, personal life and open source. I think I can find
>>>>>>>> time to
>>>>>>>> do the build if we can get a consensus.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sean
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 give it a shot...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.irian.at
>>>>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>>>>> JSF Trainings in English and German
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mathias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Time for RC3?
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Unfortunately this is building as RC2 in the filename, etc. Can you
update the version in the props files, etc?
Suggestion: We leave it as 1.1.1 and manually (for now) add RC3 to the
resulting bundles. This way the same EXACT build can be retagged as
final if we vote +1. Make sense?
Sometime in the near future I will add a tweak to the build so that
you can optionally add the suffix through ant.
sean
On 10/18/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> The tag should be done.
>
> TTFN,
>
> -bd-
> On Oct 18, 2005, at 10:36 AM, Sean Schofield wrote:
>
> > Bill,
> >
> > I will take you up on your offer. Go ahead with the
> > branching/tagging. I will try to build later today or tomorrow at the
> > latest.
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > On 10/18/05, Mathias Brökelmann <mb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> 2005/10/18, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>>
> >>> Martin
> >>>
> >>> On 10/18/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 from me too
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd be glad to help with the branch/tag stuff if you could do the
> >>>> build Sean.
> >>>>
> >>>> TTFN,
> >>>>
> >>>> -bd-
> >>>>
> >>>> On Oct 18, 2005, at 8:27 AM, Werner Punz wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Sean Schofield wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> There have been a few more changes to the branch lately. What do
> >>>>>> people think about pushing out an RC3 and then an official
> >>>>>> release
> >>>>>> shortly thereafter? Should we get the ball rolling on the
> >>>>>> RC3? I'm
> >>>>>> +1 as long as there as people have tested RC2 for the basics.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Right now I'm trying to keep my head above water with work, side
> >>>>>> consulting, personal life and open source. I think I can find
> >>>>>> time to
> >>>>>> do the build if we can get a consensus.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> sean
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> +1 give it a shot...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> http://www.irian.at
> >>> Your JSF powerhouse -
> >>> JSF Trainings in English and German
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mathias
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: Time for RC3?
Posted by Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com>.
Hi Sean,
The tag should be done.
TTFN,
-bd-
On Oct 18, 2005, at 10:36 AM, Sean Schofield wrote:
> Bill,
>
> I will take you up on your offer. Go ahead with the
> branching/tagging. I will try to build later today or tomorrow at the
> latest.
>
> Sean
>
> On 10/18/05, Mathias Brökelmann <mb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> 2005/10/18, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> On 10/18/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 from me too
>>>>
>>>> I'd be glad to help with the branch/tag stuff if you could do the
>>>> build Sean.
>>>>
>>>> TTFN,
>>>>
>>>> -bd-
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 18, 2005, at 8:27 AM, Werner Punz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Sean Schofield wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> There have been a few more changes to the branch lately. What do
>>>>>> people think about pushing out an RC3 and then an official
>>>>>> release
>>>>>> shortly thereafter? Should we get the ball rolling on the
>>>>>> RC3? I'm
>>>>>> +1 as long as there as people have tested RC2 for the basics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Right now I'm trying to keep my head above water with work, side
>>>>>> consulting, personal life and open source. I think I can find
>>>>>> time to
>>>>>> do the build if we can get a consensus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sean
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> +1 give it a shot...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> http://www.irian.at
>>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>>> JSF Trainings in English and German
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mathias
>>
>
Re: Time for RC3?
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Bill,
I will take you up on your offer. Go ahead with the
branching/tagging. I will try to build later today or tomorrow at the
latest.
Sean
On 10/18/05, Mathias Brökelmann <mb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> 2005/10/18, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > +1
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 10/18/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
> > > +1 from me too
> > >
> > > I'd be glad to help with the branch/tag stuff if you could do the
> > > build Sean.
> > >
> > > TTFN,
> > >
> > > -bd-
> > >
> > > On Oct 18, 2005, at 8:27 AM, Werner Punz wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> There have been a few more changes to the branch lately. What do
> > > >> people think about pushing out an RC3 and then an official release
> > > >> shortly thereafter? Should we get the ball rolling on the RC3? I'm
> > > >> +1 as long as there as people have tested RC2 for the basics.
> > > >>
> > > >> Right now I'm trying to keep my head above water with work, side
> > > >> consulting, personal life and open source. I think I can find
> > > >> time to
> > > >> do the build if we can get a consensus.
> > > >>
> > > >> sean
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > > +1 give it a shot...
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Trainings in English and German
> >
>
>
> --
> Mathias
>
Re: Time for RC3?
Posted by Mathias Brökelmann <mb...@googlemail.com>.
+1
2005/10/18, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 10/18/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
> > +1 from me too
> >
> > I'd be glad to help with the branch/tag stuff if you could do the
> > build Sean.
> >
> > TTFN,
> >
> > -bd-
> >
> > On Oct 18, 2005, at 8:27 AM, Werner Punz wrote:
> >
> > > Sean Schofield wrote:
> > >
> > >> There have been a few more changes to the branch lately. What do
> > >> people think about pushing out an RC3 and then an official release
> > >> shortly thereafter? Should we get the ball rolling on the RC3? I'm
> > >> +1 as long as there as people have tested RC2 for the basics.
> > >>
> > >> Right now I'm trying to keep my head above water with work, side
> > >> consulting, personal life and open source. I think I can find
> > >> time to
> > >> do the build if we can get a consensus.
> > >>
> > >> sean
> > >>
> > >>
> > > +1 give it a shot...
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Trainings in English and German
>
--
Mathias
Re: Time for RC3?
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1
regards,
Martin
On 10/18/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
> +1 from me too
>
> I'd be glad to help with the branch/tag stuff if you could do the
> build Sean.
>
> TTFN,
>
> -bd-
>
> On Oct 18, 2005, at 8:27 AM, Werner Punz wrote:
>
> > Sean Schofield wrote:
> >
> >> There have been a few more changes to the branch lately. What do
> >> people think about pushing out an RC3 and then an official release
> >> shortly thereafter? Should we get the ball rolling on the RC3? I'm
> >> +1 as long as there as people have tested RC2 for the basics.
> >>
> >> Right now I'm trying to keep my head above water with work, side
> >> consulting, personal life and open source. I think I can find
> >> time to
> >> do the build if we can get a consensus.
> >>
> >> sean
> >>
> >>
> > +1 give it a shot...
> >
> >
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Trainings in English and German
Re: Time for RC3?
Posted by Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com>.
+1 from me too
I'd be glad to help with the branch/tag stuff if you could do the
build Sean.
TTFN,
-bd-
On Oct 18, 2005, at 8:27 AM, Werner Punz wrote:
> Sean Schofield wrote:
>
>> There have been a few more changes to the branch lately. What do
>> people think about pushing out an RC3 and then an official release
>> shortly thereafter? Should we get the ball rolling on the RC3? I'm
>> +1 as long as there as people have tested RC2 for the basics.
>>
>> Right now I'm trying to keep my head above water with work, side
>> consulting, personal life and open source. I think I can find
>> time to
>> do the build if we can get a consensus.
>>
>> sean
>>
>>
> +1 give it a shot...
>
>
Re: Time for RC3?
Posted by Werner Punz <we...@gmx.at>.
Sean Schofield wrote:
> There have been a few more changes to the branch lately. What do
> people think about pushing out an RC3 and then an official release
> shortly thereafter? Should we get the ball rolling on the RC3? I'm
> +1 as long as there as people have tested RC2 for the basics.
>
> Right now I'm trying to keep my head above water with work, side
> consulting, personal life and open source. I think I can find time to
> do the build if we can get a consensus.
>
> sean
>
+1 give it a shot...