[jira] Updated: (DERBY-3491) Change SystemPermission to be a two arguement permission with a name (object the permission is on) and an action.

["Myrna van Lunteren (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Myrna van Lunteren updated DERBY-3491:
--------------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 10.4.1.3

> Change SystemPermission to be a two arguement permission with a name (object the permission is on) and an action.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3491
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3491
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Security
>            Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
>            Assignee: Daniel John Debrunner
>             Fix For: 10.4.1.3
>
>         Attachments: d3491_v01_diff.txt
>
>
> With the additional system permissions proposed in DERBY-3462 I wonder if it makes sense to change the style of names & actions in SystemPermission.
> Today a "shutdown" name is proposed and potential for future "shutdownEngine" and "shutdownServer" with no actions.
> DERBY-3462 is proposing names of jmxControl, serverControl, engineControl etc also with no actions.
> Looking at the standard Permission class it seems the name is meant to represent an object that the permission applies to and action represent actions on that object.
> Thus it would seem to make more sense and be consistent with other Permissions to have:
>  name=server action=control | monitor | shutdown
>  name=engine action=control | monitor | shutdown
>  name=jmx action=control

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.