You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> on 2006/11/07 00:45:00 UTC
[VOTE] - Restarting the vote to --- Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts
I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread
becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was
begun at
http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html
which contains some issues raised and comments to address each of those
issues.
So please vote to ratify the Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2
artifacts at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5a/ which
have been voted for by the Tuscany PPMC.
Vote thread:*
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg09797.html
Result thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg10046.html
Kind Regards, Kelvin.
Re: [VOTE] - Restarting the vote to --- Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.
-- dims
On 11/10/06, J Aaron Farr <fa...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 11/6/06, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread
> > becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was
> > begun at
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html
> > which contains some issues raised and comments to address each of those
> > issues.
> >
> > So please vote to ratify the Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2
> > artifacts at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5a/ which
> > have been voted for by the Tuscany PPMC.
>
> +1
>
> Though I agree with the earlier sentiment expressed by Bill Dudney [1]
> that the LICENSE and/or NOTICE file should explicitly state which jars
> are under which licenses. This is at least not the case for the RC5a
> binary. Otherwise, good job!
>
> --
> jaaron
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11273.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] - Restarting the vote to --- Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts
Posted by J Aaron Farr <fa...@apache.org>.
On 11/6/06, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread
> becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was
> begun at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html
> which contains some issues raised and comments to address each of those
> issues.
>
> So please vote to ratify the Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2
> artifacts at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5a/ which
> have been voted for by the Tuscany PPMC.
+1
Though I agree with the earlier sentiment expressed by Bill Dudney [1]
that the LICENSE and/or NOTICE file should explicitly state which jars
are under which licenses. This is at least not the case for the RC5a
binary. Otherwise, good job!
--
jaaron
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11273.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] - Restarting the vote to --- Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com>.
Passed with +1 votes from rubys, farra and davanum and no -1s.
Thanks to all for reviewing and commenting.
Kelvin.
On 06/11/06, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread
> becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was
> begun at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html
> which contains some issues raised and comments to address each of those
> issues.
>
> So please vote to ratify the Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2
> artifacts at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5a/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5a/>which have been voted for by the Tuscany PPMC.
>
> Vote thread:*
> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg09797.html
>
> Result thread:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg10046.html
>
> Kind Regards, Kelvin.
>
>
>