You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by Osma Suominen <os...@helsinki.fi> on 2016/01/20 08:51:01 UTC

Request for review of jena-sdb distribution

Hi,

I've recently revived the Jena SDB binary distribution, i.e. the 
building zip and tar archives that contain the necessary jars, command 
line tools and example configuration files required to create and 
maintain an SDB database. See JENA-1118 for details.

The first snapshot builds have been auto-built and are available in the 
Maven snapshot repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/jena/jena-sdb/3.1.0-SNAPSHOT/

In particular, the files
jena-sdb-3.1.0-20160118.225049-34-distribution.tar.gz
jena-sdb-3.1.0-20160118.225049-34-distribution.zip

(or whatever is the newest when you read this)

I have updated the LICENSE and NOTICE files based on similar files from 
apache-jena, but there may be problems I haven't spotted.

So I'm asking for a review of
- the binary distribution itself, i.e. does it contain what it should?
- the included LICENSE and NOTICE files

Worrying about this now will make it easier to get the next Jena release 
out.

Thanks,
Osma

-- 
Osma Suominen
D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
National Library of Finland
P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
Tel. +358 50 3199529
osma.suominen@helsinki.fi
http://www.nationallibrary.fi

Re: Request for review of jena-sdb distribution

Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
+1

Looks very good.

I checked
* LICENSE and NOTICE
* Set environment variables and created/loaded/queried a Derby-backed 
database.

	Andy

PS And the scripts are faster when not being overly dynamic about 
setting the classpath with maven.

On 20/01/16 07:51, Osma Suominen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently revived the Jena SDB binary distribution, i.e. the
> building zip and tar archives that contain the necessary jars, command
> line tools and example configuration files required to create and
> maintain an SDB database. See JENA-1118 for details.
>
> The first snapshot builds have been auto-built and are available in the
> Maven snapshot repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/jena/jena-sdb/3.1.0-SNAPSHOT/
>
>
> In particular, the files
> jena-sdb-3.1.0-20160118.225049-34-distribution.tar.gz
> jena-sdb-3.1.0-20160118.225049-34-distribution.zip
>
> (or whatever is the newest when you read this)
>
> I have updated the LICENSE and NOTICE files based on similar files from
> apache-jena, but there may be problems I haven't spotted.
>
> So I'm asking for a review of
> - the binary distribution itself, i.e. does it contain what it should?
> - the included LICENSE and NOTICE files
>
> Worrying about this now will make it easier to get the next Jena release
> out.
>
> Thanks,
> Osma
>


Re: Request for review of jena-sdb distribution

Posted by Osma Suominen <os...@helsinki.fi>.
Hi!

So far there has been only one public response (thanks Andy!). If there 
are no further opinions about this within 24 hours, I will assume that 
there's a lazy consensus and conclude that the SDB distribution is good.

-Osma



On 20/01/16 09:51, Osma Suominen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently revived the Jena SDB binary distribution, i.e. the
> building zip and tar archives that contain the necessary jars, command
> line tools and example configuration files required to create and
> maintain an SDB database. See JENA-1118 for details.
>
> The first snapshot builds have been auto-built and are available in the
> Maven snapshot repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/jena/jena-sdb/3.1.0-SNAPSHOT/
>
>
> In particular, the files
> jena-sdb-3.1.0-20160118.225049-34-distribution.tar.gz
> jena-sdb-3.1.0-20160118.225049-34-distribution.zip
>
> (or whatever is the newest when you read this)
>
> I have updated the LICENSE and NOTICE files based on similar files from
> apache-jena, but there may be problems I haven't spotted.
>
> So I'm asking for a review of
> - the binary distribution itself, i.e. does it contain what it should?
> - the included LICENSE and NOTICE files
>
> Worrying about this now will make it easier to get the next Jena release
> out.
>
> Thanks,
> Osma
>


-- 
Osma Suominen
D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
National Library of Finland
P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
Tel. +358 50 3199529
osma.suominen@helsinki.fi
http://www.nationallibrary.fi