You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net> on 2011/02/16 20:40:17 UTC

Re: svn commit: r1071368 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc/status.c svn/status.c tests/cmdline/stat_tests.py

On 02/16/2011 02:27 PM, stsp@apache.org wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Wed Feb 16 19:27:40 2011
> New Revision: 1071368
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1071368&view=rev
> Log:
> Make 'svn status' report nested working copies as unversioned regardless
> of the format of their working copies.

[...]

> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/stat_tests.py
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/stat_tests.py?rev=1071368&r1=1071367&r2=1071368&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/stat_tests.py (original)
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/stat_tests.py Wed Feb 16 19:27:40 2011
> @@ -1793,7 +1793,6 @@ def status_with_tree_conflicts(sbox):
>  
>  #----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  # Regression for issue #3742
> -@XFail()
>  @Issue(3742)
>  def status_nested_wc_old_format(sbox):
>    "status on wc with nested old-format wc"

Should the log message reference issue #3742?

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand


Re: svn commit: r1071368 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc/status.c svn/status.c tests/cmdline/stat_tests.py

Posted by Stefan Sperling <st...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:40:17PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 02/16/2011 02:27 PM, stsp@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: stsp
> > Date: Wed Feb 16 19:27:40 2011
> > New Revision: 1071368

> > @@ -1793,7 +1793,6 @@ def status_with_tree_conflicts(sbox):
> >  
> >  #----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  # Regression for issue #3742
> > -@XFail()
> >  @Issue(3742)
> >  def status_nested_wc_old_format(sbox):
> >    "status on wc with nested old-format wc"
> 
> Should the log message reference issue #3742?

Thanks, adjusted.