You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Craig Zeigler <cr...@cfrscca.net> on 2006/11/26 00:09:59 UTC
Not sure what to do about this...
it seems over the past couple of weeks, I'm getting 50-80 of these per
day into my inbox. From what I can tell, it isn't hitting the bayes
filters when other messages do. Anyone have any idea? I have sorted
these and trained the bayes filters, but if it isn't hitting them I
don't know what more to do. Sometimes the same message ends up in my
junk filter, and the bayes score is in the header. I'm at a loss.
Thanks, Craig
The message got sent back to me, so i'm going to have to just paste what
I can from the headers...
To:
<cr...@caffeine-addict.com>
Return-Path:
<ge...@earthlink.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version:
SpamAssassin 3.1.3-gr0 (2006-06-01) on charlotte.ctrust.com
X-Spam-Level:
****
X-Spam-Status:
No, score=4.5 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK autolearn=no version=3.1.3-gr0
Re: Not sure what to do about this...
Posted by jdow <jd...@earthlink.net>.
From: "John Andersen" <js...@pen.homeip.net>
> Raise the score of RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 and RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100
> significantly. Like maybe 3.0 for each.
>
> IMHO, anything that hits both of those is spam.
meta RAZOR2_E8_AND_E4 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 && RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100
score RAZOR2_E8_AND_E4 3
Or something like that might do better than increasing the individual
scores. Pick a suitable combined score. Then implement.
Meta rules are handy little things.
{^_^}
Re: Not sure what to do about this...
Posted by John Andersen <js...@pen.homeip.net>.
On Saturday 25 November 2006 14:09, Craig Zeigler wrote:
> I have sorted
> these and trained the bayes filters, but if it isn't hitting them I
> don't know what more to do.
> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100,
> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK autolearn=no version=3.1.3-gr0
Raise the score of RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 and RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100
significantly. Like maybe 3.0 for each.
IMHO, anything that hits both of those is spam.
--
_____________________________________
John Andersen
Re: Not sure what to do about this...
Posted by Rick Macdougall <ri...@ummm-beer.com>.
Craig Zeigler wrote:
>
> it seems over the past couple of weeks, I'm getting 50-80 of these per
> day into my inbox. From what I can tell, it isn't hitting the bayes
> filters when other messages do. Anyone have any idea? I have sorted
> these and trained the bayes filters, but if it isn't hitting them I
> don't know what more to do. Sometimes the same message ends up in my
> junk filter, and the bayes score is in the header. I'm at a loss.
> Thanks, Craig
>
> The message got sent back to me, so i'm going to have to just paste what
> I can from the headers...
>
> To:
> <cr...@caffeine-addict.com>
> Return-Path:
> <ge...@earthlink.net>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version:
> SpamAssassin 3.1.3-gr0 (2006-06-01) on charlotte.ctrust.com
> X-Spam-Level:
> ****
> X-Spam-Status:
> No, score=4.5 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,
> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100,
> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK autolearn=no version=3.1.3-gr0
>
Hi,
Are you sure your bayes is working correctly ? I don't see any bayes
score in that report at all. You should always see a bayes score if it
is working.
Regards,
Rick