SVN tags for our releases

[Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>]

For uimaj-2.2.0 I created a directory, and collected all the
various release candidate tags under it.  For 2.1.0, we
didn't do that, and it's a bit disorganized.  Anybody mind
if I retroactively create a uimaj-2.1.0 dir and move all
2.1 tags under it?  It's not going to affect our SVN history
in any way, it's just a little easier to find things.

Any objections?

--Thilo

Re: SVN tags for our releases

[Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>]

On 8/8/07, Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de> wrote:
> For uimaj-2.2.0 I created a directory, and collected all the
> various release candidate tags under it.  For 2.1.0, we
> didn't do that, and it's a bit disorganized.  Anybody mind
> if I retroactively create a uimaj-2.1.0 dir and move all
> 2.1 tags under it?  It's not going to affect our SVN history
> in any way, it's just a little easier to find things.
>

+1

-Adam

Re: SVN tags for our releases

[Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>]

Thilo Goetz wrote:
> For uimaj-2.2.0 I created a directory, and collected all the
> various release candidate tags under it.  For 2.1.0, we
> didn't do that, and it's a bit disorganized.  Anybody mind
> if I retroactively create a uimaj-2.1.0 dir and move all
> 2.1 tags under it?  It's not going to affect our SVN history
> in any way, it's just a little easier to find things.
>
> Any objections?
>
> --Thilo
>
>
>   
+1

--Michael

Re: SVN tags for our releases

[Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>]

Thilo Goetz wrote:
> For uimaj-2.2.0 I created a directory, and collected all the
> various release candidate tags under it.  For 2.1.0, we
> didn't do that, and it's a bit disorganized.  Anybody mind
> if I retroactively create a uimaj-2.1.0 dir and move all
> 2.1 tags under it?  It's not going to affect our SVN history
> in any way, it's just a little easier to find things.
>
> Any objections?
>
> --Thilo
>
>
>   
+1  Marshall