You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ignite.apache.org by Igor Sapego <is...@gridgain.com> on 2016/12/01 16:54:16 UTC
Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Denis,
I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was already
resolved
by another fix made by Alexander.
For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
[2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
Best Regards,
Igor
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from PHP PDO
> side.
>
> The first one is related to DML.
> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
>
> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue before
> 1.8 is sent for vote.
>
> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only. Igor
> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in DSN <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Update for DML testing:
> >
> > IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
> previous
> > failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Vladimir,
> >>
> >> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
> >>
> >> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation is
> >> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
> >> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> >> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
> >> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> >> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
> >>
> >> —
> >> Denis
> >>
> >>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Folks,
> >>>
> >>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets you
> >>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
> >>>
> >>> Vladimir.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi
> >>>>
> >>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts
> in
> >>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
> >> following
> >>>> unclear points
> >>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> >>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store?
> >> In
> >>>> that case why do not make one module?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged
> in
> >>>>> 1.8 branch).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> >>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>:
> >>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
> >>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message
> >>>>> because
> >>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
> >>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> >>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several
> >>>>> problems
> >>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
> >>>>> ignite-1.8
> >>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the
> next
> >>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Any objections?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But
> >>>> now
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>>> have some
> >>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
> >>>> There
> >>>>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>> ticket for
> >>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Alexander,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
> >>>> Can I
> >>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
> >>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
> >>>> good
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
> >>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> >>>>> features
> >>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> >>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> >>>>>>>>>> <al...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> >>>> vozerov@gridgain.com
> >>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems
> >>>>> that
> >>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
> >>>>>>> remaining
> >>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for
> >>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>> soon
> >>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
> >>>>>>> happen?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>> dmagda@apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> >>>> Recently
> >>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
> >>>>>>> related
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
> >>>>>>>>> co-exist at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
> >>>>>>>>> documentation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
> >>>>> hidden
> >>>>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
> >>>>> once
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
> >>>>> suffix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
> >>>>>>>>> readme.io <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> >>>>>>> td10868.html
> >>>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> >>>>>>>> td10868.html>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> >>>>>>>> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
> >>>>> into
> >>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> >>>> overall
> >>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> >>>>> isapego@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
> >>>> they
> >>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that
> >>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>> DML
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge
> >>>> my
> >>>>>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
> >>>> and
> >>>>>>>>> examples
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> >>>>>>>>> ptupitsyn@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> >>>> CacheEntryProcessor
> >>>>>>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can.
> >>>>> But I
> >>>>>>>>> can't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> >>>> changes
> >>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> >>>>> documentation
> >>>>>>>>> and be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
> >>>>>>>> usability
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
> >>>> Ignite
> >>>>>>>> users?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
> >>>> can
> >>>>>>> take
> >>>>>>>>> over
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:
> >>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
> >>>>> mostly
> >>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
> >>>>>>>> streamer's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> >>>>> easily).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
> >>>>> hash
> >>>>>>>> codes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> >>>> branch,
> >>>>> I
> >>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>> ask
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> >>>> follows:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of
> >>>>> auto
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very
> >>>>>>>> hashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> >>>> passed.
> >>>>> So
> >>>>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergey Kozlov
> > GridGain Systems
> > www.gridgain.com
>
>
Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>.
Thanks,
Created a ticket and assigned it on Nick
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4402 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4402>
Nick, reassign it on me once the images are ready.
—
Denis
> On Dec 8, 2016, at 12:06 AM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Denis
>
> Usually Nikolay makes docker image for a new release. I just check it.
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Igniters,
>>
>> Who usually prepares docker and other cloud images for each new Ignite
>> release and who will be able to handle it this time?
>> https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#docker <https://ignite.apache.org/
>> download.cgi#docker>
>>
>> Sergey K., Nikolay T., are you aware about this?
>>
>> —
>> Denis
>>
>>> On Dec 3, 2016, at 12:54 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> More news for DML:
>>>
>>> IGNITE-4364 DML: AssertionError: Row@ ... null 5 -> mapcol_asc_idx
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4364>
>>> - sporadic failure, not blocker but need pay attention
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alexander, thanks for the update and all your efforts!
>>>>
>>>> Would agree that IGNITE-4340 sounds like a serious bug that should be
>>>> fixed in 1.8 while IGNITE-4363 can be put off till the next release.
>>>>
>>>> As for the vote it should be started in the very beginning of the next
>>>> week. We were, mostly, waiting for green light from your side :)
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> Denis
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 2, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sergey, your issue has been resolved - apparently a won't fix as it's
>>>>> not an Ignite problem but a (rather rational) H2's behavior :) It was
>>>>> a fun brainteaser before sleep :D Please see details on issue page -
>>>>> it's about arithmetic and type conversions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dmitry, yes, I do or modify existing tests where applicable.
>>>>>
>>>>> Latest DML news:
>>>>>
>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340 Implicitly cast
>>>>> new column values to expected types on SQL UPDATE - fixed (together
>>>>> with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4333 SQL engine does
>>>>> not preserve metadata about array content's type and 4346 - the one
>>>>> about PHP PDO)
>>>>>
>>>>> - found inner properties mutation problem
>>>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4363 Inner properties
>>>>> mutation broken in SQL UPDATE)
>>>>>
>>>>> - the problem above will most likely be fixed post 1.8 with other
>>>>> issues/improvements related with DML - I've got a (small :) ) list of
>>>>> them and will create proper issues for all that tech debt during the
>>>>> weekend or on Monday.
>>>>>
>>>>> - TC tests seem to be all green on DML side as well as all in all.
>>>>> What's the status of release vote guys?
>>>>>
>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-12-03 2:08 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@apache.org>:
>>>>>> Alexander, thanks for making the fixes to DML. Are you adding JUnits
>> for
>>>>>> all the fixes you are making?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Recent fixes from Alexander made DML much better!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've found one issue but it is not blocker for the release:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IGNITE-4362 DML: the multiplication for SET uses the data type for
>> the
>>>>>>> result from the right side
>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4362>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Vladimir,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8.
>> Looks
>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>> we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which
>>>>>>> looks
>>>>>>>>> pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved
>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <is...@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was
>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>> resolved
>>>>>>>>>> by another fix made by Alexander.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
>>>>>>>>>> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite
>> from
>>>>>>> PHP
>>>>>>>>>> PDO
>>>>>>>>>>> side.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The first one is related to DML.
>>>>>>>>>>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue
>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 is sent for vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability
>> only.
>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
>>>>>>>>>>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in
>>>>>>> DSN <
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <
>> skozlov@gridgain.com
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Update for DML testing:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception
>> from
>>>>>>>>>>> previous
>>>>>>>>>>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <
>> dmagda@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this
>>>> feature
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote
>>>>>>> computation
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature
>>>> here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable
>>>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <
>>>>>>>> skozlov@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into
>> three
>>>>>>>> parts
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I
>> see
>>>>>>>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unclear points
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
>>>>>>>>>> ignite-cassandra-store?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that case why do not make one module?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already
>>>>>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 branch).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not
>>>>>>> fixed).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <
>>>> skozlov@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to
>> send
>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/
>>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong
>>>> result
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
>>>>>>>>>> several
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML
>>>> finalization
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them
>> for
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
>>>>>>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into
>>>> ignite-1.8.
>>>>>>>>>> But
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working
>> on
>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings
>>>> there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related
>>>>>>> changes?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.
>>>>>>> io/docs/pdo-interoperability
>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.
>> io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch
>> is
>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these
>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases
>>>>>>> (shortly):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and
>> it
>>>>>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the
>>>>>>> biggest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate
>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when
>> it
>>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
>> jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets
>> released.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the
>>>>>>>> difficulties
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version
>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to
>>>>>>> create a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hidden
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it
>>>>>>>> visible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suffix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi
>> will
>>>>>>>>>> create
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-
>> developers.2346864.n4.nabble
>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-
>>>> consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-
>>>> consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new
>>>> features?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis
>> Magda
>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets
>>>>>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when
>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but
>> without
>>>>>>> DML
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in
>>>> doing
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DML
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time
>> to
>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code
>> itself,
>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ptupitsyn@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that
>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> 1.8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them
>> as
>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>> can.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date
>> yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the
>> reviews.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO)
>> related
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> .NET
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usability
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the
>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there
>> anyone
>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented
>>>> (basicness
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mostly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to
>>>>>>>> specify
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> streamer's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be
>>>> improved
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easily).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after
>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hash
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> codes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in
>> ignite-4011-1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests
>>>> live
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are
>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first
>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test
>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those
>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current
>>>> code.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>> GridGain Systems
>>> www.gridgain.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sergey Kozlov
> GridGain Systems
> www.gridgain.com
Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Posted by Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>.
Hi Denis
Usually Nikolay makes docker image for a new release. I just check it.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> Who usually prepares docker and other cloud images for each new Ignite
> release and who will be able to handle it this time?
> https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#docker <https://ignite.apache.org/
> download.cgi#docker>
>
> Sergey K., Nikolay T., are you aware about this?
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Dec 3, 2016, at 12:54 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > More news for DML:
> >
> > IGNITE-4364 DML: AssertionError: Row@ ... null 5 -> mapcol_asc_idx
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4364>
> > - sporadic failure, not blocker but need pay attention
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Alexander, thanks for the update and all your efforts!
> >>
> >> Would agree that IGNITE-4340 sounds like a serious bug that should be
> >> fixed in 1.8 while IGNITE-4363 can be put off till the next release.
> >>
> >> As for the vote it should be started in the very beginning of the next
> >> week. We were, mostly, waiting for green light from your side :)
> >>
> >> —
> >> Denis
> >>
> >>> On Dec 2, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Sergey, your issue has been resolved - apparently a won't fix as it's
> >>> not an Ignite problem but a (rather rational) H2's behavior :) It was
> >>> a fun brainteaser before sleep :D Please see details on issue page -
> >>> it's about arithmetic and type conversions.
> >>>
> >>> Dmitry, yes, I do or modify existing tests where applicable.
> >>>
> >>> Latest DML news:
> >>>
> >>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340 Implicitly cast
> >>> new column values to expected types on SQL UPDATE - fixed (together
> >>> with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4333 SQL engine does
> >>> not preserve metadata about array content's type and 4346 - the one
> >>> about PHP PDO)
> >>>
> >>> - found inner properties mutation problem
> >>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4363 Inner properties
> >>> mutation broken in SQL UPDATE)
> >>>
> >>> - the problem above will most likely be fixed post 1.8 with other
> >>> issues/improvements related with DML - I've got a (small :) ) list of
> >>> them and will create proper issues for all that tech debt during the
> >>> weekend or on Monday.
> >>>
> >>> - TC tests seem to be all green on DML side as well as all in all.
> >>> What's the status of release vote guys?
> >>>
> >>> - Alex
> >>>
> >>> 2016-12-03 2:08 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@apache.org>:
> >>>> Alexander, thanks for making the fixes to DML. Are you adding JUnits
> for
> >>>> all the fixes you are making?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Recent fixes from Alexander made DML much better!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've found one issue but it is not blocker for the release:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IGNITE-4362 DML: the multiplication for SET uses the data type for
> the
> >>>>> result from the right side
> >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4362>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Vladimir,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> —
> >>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8.
> Looks
> >>>>> like
> >>>>>>> we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which
> >>>>> looks
> >>>>>>> pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved
> >> and
> >>>>>>> start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <is...@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was
> >>>>>> already
> >>>>>>>> resolved
> >>>>>>>> by another fix made by Alexander.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
> >>>>>>>> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite
> from
> >>>>> PHP
> >>>>>>>> PDO
> >>>>>>>>> side.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The first one is related to DML.
> >>>>>>>>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue
> >>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>> 1.8 is sent for vote.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability
> only.
> >>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
> >>>>>>>>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in
> >>>>> DSN <
> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <
> skozlov@gridgain.com
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Update for DML testing:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception
> from
> >>>>>>>>> previous
> >>>>>>>>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
> >>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <
> dmagda@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this
> >> feature
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote
> >>>>> computation
> >>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature
> >> here.
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> >>>>>>>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> >>>>>>>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> >>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable
> >>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <
> >>>>>> skozlov@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into
> three
> >>>>>> parts
> >>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I
> see
> >>>>>>>>>>> following
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> unclear points
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
> >>>>>>>> ignite-cassandra-store?
> >>>>>>>>>>> In
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that case why do not make one module?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already
> >>>>>> merged
> >>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 branch).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not
> >>>>> fixed).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <
> >> skozlov@gridgain.com
> >>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to
> send
> >>>>>>>> message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> because
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/
> >>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong
> >> result
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
> >>>>>>>> several
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> problems
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML
> >> finalization
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them
> for
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any objections?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
> >>>>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into
> >> ignite-1.8.
> >>>>>>>> But
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> now
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have some
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working
> on
> >>>>>> them.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings
> >> there.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related
> >>>>> changes?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Can I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.
> >>>>> io/docs/pdo-interoperability
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.
> io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch
> is
> >>>>> now
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> good
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes
> >>>>> will
> >>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these
> >> new
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> features
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases
> >>>>> (shortly):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <al...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and
> it
> >>>>>>>> seems
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the
> >>>>> biggest
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remaining
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate
> >> branch
> >>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when
> it
> >>>>>> might
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets
> released.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the
> >>>>>> difficulties
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
> >>>>>>>> versions
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version
> >> for
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to
> >>>>> create a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hidden
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it
> >>>>>> visible
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> once
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page
> >>>>> with
> >>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> suffix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi
> will
> >>>>>>>> create
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-
> developers.2346864.n4.nabble
> >> .
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-
> >> consistency-on-readme-io-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-
> >> consistency-on-readme-io-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new
> >> features?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis
> Magda
> >> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets
> >>>>>> merged
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when
> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> overall
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but
> without
> >>>>> DML
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in
> >> doing
> >>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DML
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time
> to
> >>>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> my
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code
> itself,
> >>>>>> tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ptupitsyn@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that
> >> for
> >>>>>>>> 1.8.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them
> as
> >> I
> >>>>>>>> can.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date
> yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the
> reviews.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
> >> jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
> >>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
> >> jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
> >>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO)
> related
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all
> >> the
> >>>>>>>> .NET
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usability
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the
> >> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
> >>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
> >>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there
> anyone
> >>>>> who
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented
> >> (basicness
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mostly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to
> >>>>>> specify
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> streamer's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be
> >> improved
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> easily).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after
> >>>>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hash
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> codes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in
> ignite-4011-1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests
> >> live
> >>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are
> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> follows:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first
> >>>>> version
> >>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> auto
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test
> >> these
> >>>>>>>> very
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those
> tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> passed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current
> >> code.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergey Kozlov
> > GridGain Systems
> > www.gridgain.com
>
>
--
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com
Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>.
Igniters,
Who usually prepares docker and other cloud images for each new Ignite release and who will be able to handle it this time?
https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#docker <https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#docker>
Sergey K., Nikolay T., are you aware about this?
—
Denis
> On Dec 3, 2016, at 12:54 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> More news for DML:
>
> IGNITE-4364 DML: AssertionError: Row@ ... null 5 -> mapcol_asc_idx
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4364>
> - sporadic failure, not blocker but need pay attention
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Alexander, thanks for the update and all your efforts!
>>
>> Would agree that IGNITE-4340 sounds like a serious bug that should be
>> fixed in 1.8 while IGNITE-4363 can be put off till the next release.
>>
>> As for the vote it should be started in the very beginning of the next
>> week. We were, mostly, waiting for green light from your side :)
>>
>> —
>> Denis
>>
>>> On Dec 2, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sergey, your issue has been resolved - apparently a won't fix as it's
>>> not an Ignite problem but a (rather rational) H2's behavior :) It was
>>> a fun brainteaser before sleep :D Please see details on issue page -
>>> it's about arithmetic and type conversions.
>>>
>>> Dmitry, yes, I do or modify existing tests where applicable.
>>>
>>> Latest DML news:
>>>
>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340 Implicitly cast
>>> new column values to expected types on SQL UPDATE - fixed (together
>>> with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4333 SQL engine does
>>> not preserve metadata about array content's type and 4346 - the one
>>> about PHP PDO)
>>>
>>> - found inner properties mutation problem
>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4363 Inner properties
>>> mutation broken in SQL UPDATE)
>>>
>>> - the problem above will most likely be fixed post 1.8 with other
>>> issues/improvements related with DML - I've got a (small :) ) list of
>>> them and will create proper issues for all that tech debt during the
>>> weekend or on Monday.
>>>
>>> - TC tests seem to be all green on DML side as well as all in all.
>>> What's the status of release vote guys?
>>>
>>> - Alex
>>>
>>> 2016-12-03 2:08 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@apache.org>:
>>>> Alexander, thanks for making the fixes to DML. Are you adding JUnits for
>>>> all the fixes you are making?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Recent fixes from Alexander made DML much better!
>>>>>
>>>>> I've found one issue but it is not blocker for the release:
>>>>>
>>>>> IGNITE-4362 DML: the multiplication for SET uses the data type for the
>>>>> result from the right side
>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4362>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Vladimir,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> —
>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks
>>>>> like
>>>>>>> we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which
>>>>> looks
>>>>>>> pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved
>> and
>>>>>>> start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <is...@gridgain.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was
>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>> resolved
>>>>>>>> by another fix made by Alexander.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
>>>>>>>> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from
>>>>> PHP
>>>>>>>> PDO
>>>>>>>>> side.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The first one is related to DML.
>>>>>>>>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue
>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>> 1.8 is sent for vote.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only.
>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
>>>>>>>>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in
>>>>> DSN <
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com
>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Update for DML testing:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
>>>>>>>>> previous
>>>>>>>>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
>>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this
>> feature
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote
>>>>> computation
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature
>> here.
>>>>>>>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>>>>>>>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
>>>>>>>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>>>>>>>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable
>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <
>>>>>> skozlov@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three
>>>>>> parts
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
>>>>>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>>>>>>>> unclear points
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
>>>>>>>> ignite-cassandra-store?
>>>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that case why do not make one module?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already
>>>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 branch).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not
>>>>> fixed).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <
>> skozlov@gridgain.com
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send
>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/
>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong
>> result
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
>>>>>>>> several
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML
>> finalization
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
>>>>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into
>> ignite-1.8.
>>>>>>>> But
>>>>>>>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on
>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings
>> there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related
>>>>> changes?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.
>>>>> io/docs/pdo-interoperability
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is
>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes
>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these
>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases
>>>>> (shortly):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
>>>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the
>>>>> biggest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate
>> branch
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it
>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the
>>>>>> difficulties
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version
>> for
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to
>>>>> create a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hidden
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it
>>>>>> visible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page
>>>>> with
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suffix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
>>>>>>>> create
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble
>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-
>> consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-
>> consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new
>> features?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda
>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets
>>>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> overall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without
>>>>> DML
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in
>> doing
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DML
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself,
>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ptupitsyn@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that
>> for
>>>>>>>> 1.8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as
>> I
>>>>>>>> can.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
>> jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all
>> the
>>>>>>>> .NET
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usability
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the
>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone
>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented
>> (basicness
>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mostly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to
>>>>>> specify
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> streamer's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be
>> improved
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easily).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after
>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hash
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> codes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests
>> live
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first
>>>>> version
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test
>> these
>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>> passed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current
>> code.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sergey Kozlov
> GridGain Systems
> www.gridgain.com
Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Posted by Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>.
Hi
More news for DML:
IGNITE-4364 DML: AssertionError: Row@ ... null 5 -> mapcol_asc_idx
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4364>
- sporadic failure, not blocker but need pay attention
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Alexander, thanks for the update and all your efforts!
>
> Would agree that IGNITE-4340 sounds like a serious bug that should be
> fixed in 1.8 while IGNITE-4363 can be put off till the next release.
>
> As for the vote it should be started in the very beginning of the next
> week. We were, mostly, waiting for green light from your side :)
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Dec 2, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sergey, your issue has been resolved - apparently a won't fix as it's
> > not an Ignite problem but a (rather rational) H2's behavior :) It was
> > a fun brainteaser before sleep :D Please see details on issue page -
> > it's about arithmetic and type conversions.
> >
> > Dmitry, yes, I do or modify existing tests where applicable.
> >
> > Latest DML news:
> >
> > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340 Implicitly cast
> > new column values to expected types on SQL UPDATE - fixed (together
> > with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4333 SQL engine does
> > not preserve metadata about array content's type and 4346 - the one
> > about PHP PDO)
> >
> > - found inner properties mutation problem
> > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4363 Inner properties
> > mutation broken in SQL UPDATE)
> >
> > - the problem above will most likely be fixed post 1.8 with other
> > issues/improvements related with DML - I've got a (small :) ) list of
> > them and will create proper issues for all that tech debt during the
> > weekend or on Monday.
> >
> > - TC tests seem to be all green on DML side as well as all in all.
> > What's the status of release vote guys?
> >
> > - Alex
> >
> > 2016-12-03 2:08 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@apache.org>:
> >> Alexander, thanks for making the fixes to DML. Are you adding JUnits for
> >> all the fixes you are making?
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> Recent fixes from Alexander made DML much better!
> >>>
> >>> I've found one issue but it is not blocker for the release:
> >>>
> >>> IGNITE-4362 DML: the multiplication for SET uses the data type for the
> >>> result from the right side
> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4362>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Vladimir,
> >>>>
> >>>> Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it?
> >>>>
> >>>> —
> >>>> Denis
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks
> >>> like
> >>>>> we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which
> >>> looks
> >>>>> pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved
> and
> >>>>> start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <is...@gridgain.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was
> >>>> already
> >>>>>> resolved
> >>>>>> by another fix made by Alexander.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
> >>>>>> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from
> >>> PHP
> >>>>>> PDO
> >>>>>>> side.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The first one is related to DML.
> >>>>>>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue
> >>> before
> >>>>>>> 1.8 is sent for vote.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only.
> >>>> Igor
> >>>>>>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
> >>>>>>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in
> >>> DSN <
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com
> >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Update for DML testing:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
> >>>>>>> previous
> >>>>>>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
> >>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Vladimir,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this
> feature
> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote
> >>> computation
> >>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature
> here.
> >>>>>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> >>>>>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
> >>>>>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> >>>>>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> >>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable
> >>> tickets
> >>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <
> >>>> skozlov@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three
> >>>> parts
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
> >>>>>>>>> following
> >>>>>>>>>>> unclear points
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
> >>>>>> ignite-cassandra-store?
> >>>>>>>>> In
> >>>>>>>>>>> that case why do not make one module?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already
> >>>> merged
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 branch).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> >>>>>>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not
> >>> fixed).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <
> skozlov@gridgain.com
> >>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send
> >>>>>> message
> >>>>>>>>>>>> because
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/
> >>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong
> result
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> >>>>>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
> >>>>>> several
> >>>>>>>>>>>> problems
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML
> finalization
> >>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for
> >>> the
> >>>>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any objections?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
> >>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into
> ignite-1.8.
> >>>>>> But
> >>>>>>>>>>> now
> >>>>>>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have some
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on
> >>>> them.
> >>>>>>>>>>> There
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings
> there.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <
> >>>> dmagda@apache.org
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related
> >>> changes?
> >>>>>>>>>>> Can I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.
> >>> io/docs/pdo-interoperability
> >>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is
> >>> now
> >>>>>>>>>>> good
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes
> >>> will
> >>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these
> new
> >>>>>>>>>>>> features
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases
> >>> (shortly):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <al...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> >>>>>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
> >>>>>> seems
> >>>>>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the
> >>> biggest
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> remaining
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate
> branch
> >>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it
> >>>> might
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Recently
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the
> >>>> difficulties
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> related
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
> >>>>>> versions
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version
> for
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to
> >>> create a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> hidden
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it
> >>>> visible
> >>>>>>>>>>>> once
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page
> >>> with
> >>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> suffix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
> >>>>>> create
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble
> .
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-
> consistency-on-readme-io-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-
> consistency-on-readme-io-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new
> features?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda
> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets
> >>>> merged
> >>>>>>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> >>>>>>>>>>> overall
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without
> >>> DML
> >>>>>>>>>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in
> doing
> >>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DML
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
> >>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>> my
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself,
> >>>> tests
> >>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ptupitsyn@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> >>>>>>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that
> for
> >>>>>> 1.8.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as
> I
> >>>>>> can.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> But I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
> >>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
> >>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> >>>>>>>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all
> the
> >>>>>> .NET
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usability
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the
> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
> >>> jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
> >>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
> >>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
> >>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone
> >>> who
> >>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> take
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented
> (basicness
> >>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>> mostly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to
> >>>> specify
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> streamer's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be
> improved
> >>>>>>>>>>>> easily).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after
> >>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>> hash
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> codes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> >>>>>>>>>>> branch,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests
> live
> >>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> >>>>>>>>>>> follows:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first
> >>> version
> >>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>> auto
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test
> these
> >>>>>> very
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> >>>>>>>>>>> passed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current
> code.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>> GridGain Systems
> >>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>
>
>
--
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com
Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>.
Alexander, thanks for the update and all your efforts!
Would agree that IGNITE-4340 sounds like a serious bug that should be fixed in 1.8 while IGNITE-4363 can be put off till the next release.
As for the vote it should be started in the very beginning of the next week. We were, mostly, waiting for green light from your side :)
—
Denis
> On Dec 2, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Alexander Paschenko <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sergey, your issue has been resolved - apparently a won't fix as it's
> not an Ignite problem but a (rather rational) H2's behavior :) It was
> a fun brainteaser before sleep :D Please see details on issue page -
> it's about arithmetic and type conversions.
>
> Dmitry, yes, I do or modify existing tests where applicable.
>
> Latest DML news:
>
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340 Implicitly cast
> new column values to expected types on SQL UPDATE - fixed (together
> with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4333 SQL engine does
> not preserve metadata about array content's type and 4346 - the one
> about PHP PDO)
>
> - found inner properties mutation problem
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4363 Inner properties
> mutation broken in SQL UPDATE)
>
> - the problem above will most likely be fixed post 1.8 with other
> issues/improvements related with DML - I've got a (small :) ) list of
> them and will create proper issues for all that tech debt during the
> weekend or on Monday.
>
> - TC tests seem to be all green on DML side as well as all in all.
> What's the status of release vote guys?
>
> - Alex
>
> 2016-12-03 2:08 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@apache.org>:
>> Alexander, thanks for making the fixes to DML. Are you adding JUnits for
>> all the fixes you are making?
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Recent fixes from Alexander made DML much better!
>>>
>>> I've found one issue but it is not blocker for the release:
>>>
>>> IGNITE-4362 DML: the multiplication for SET uses the data type for the
>>> result from the right side
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4362>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Vladimir,
>>>>
>>>> Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it?
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> Denis
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>
>>>>> I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks
>>> like
>>>>> we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which
>>> looks
>>>>> pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and
>>>>> start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340
>>>>>
>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <is...@gridgain.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was
>>>> already
>>>>>> resolved
>>>>>> by another fix made by Alexander.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
>>>>>> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from
>>> PHP
>>>>>> PDO
>>>>>>> side.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The first one is related to DML.
>>>>>>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue
>>> before
>>>>>>> 1.8 is sent for vote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only.
>>>> Igor
>>>>>>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
>>>>>>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in
>>> DSN <
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Update for DML testing:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
>>>>>>> previous
>>>>>>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Vladimir,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote
>>> computation
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
>>>>>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>>>>>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
>>>>>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>>>>>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable
>>> tickets
>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <
>>>> skozlov@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three
>>>> parts
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
>>>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>>>>>> unclear points
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
>>>>>> ignite-cassandra-store?
>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>>>> that case why do not make one module?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already
>>>> merged
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 branch).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
>>>>>>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not
>>> fixed).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com
>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send
>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/
>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>>>>>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
>>>>>> several
>>>>>>>>>>>> problems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization
>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for
>>> the
>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
>>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8.
>>>>>> But
>>>>>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on
>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>>>> There
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <
>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related
>>> changes?
>>>>>>>>>>> Can I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.
>>> io/docs/pdo-interoperability
>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is
>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes
>>> will
>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
>>>>>>>>>>>> features
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases
>>> (shortly):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
>>>>>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the
>>> biggest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it
>>>> might
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
>>>>>>>>>>> Recently
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the
>>>> difficulties
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to
>>> create a
>>>>>>>>>>>> hidden
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it
>>>> visible
>>>>>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page
>>> with
>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> suffix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
>>>>>> create
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets
>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
>>>>>>>>>>> overall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
>>>>>>>>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without
>>> DML
>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DML
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself,
>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ptupitsyn@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
>>>>>>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
>>>>>> 1.8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
>>>>>> can.
>>>>>>>>>>>> But I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
>>>>>> .NET
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usability
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone
>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness
>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> mostly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to
>>>> specify
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> streamer's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
>>>>>>>>>>>> easily).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after
>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>> hash
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> codes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
>>>>>>>>>>> branch,
>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live
>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
>>>>>>>>>>> follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first
>>> version
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>> auto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
>>>>>>>>>>> passed.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>> GridGain Systems
>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>
Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Posted by Alexander Paschenko <al...@gmail.com>.
Sergey, your issue has been resolved - apparently a won't fix as it's
not an Ignite problem but a (rather rational) H2's behavior :) It was
a fun brainteaser before sleep :D Please see details on issue page -
it's about arithmetic and type conversions.
Dmitry, yes, I do or modify existing tests where applicable.
Latest DML news:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340 Implicitly cast
new column values to expected types on SQL UPDATE - fixed (together
with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4333 SQL engine does
not preserve metadata about array content's type and 4346 - the one
about PHP PDO)
- found inner properties mutation problem
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4363 Inner properties
mutation broken in SQL UPDATE)
- the problem above will most likely be fixed post 1.8 with other
issues/improvements related with DML - I've got a (small :) ) list of
them and will create proper issues for all that tech debt during the
weekend or on Monday.
- TC tests seem to be all green on DML side as well as all in all.
What's the status of release vote guys?
- Alex
2016-12-03 2:08 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@apache.org>:
> Alexander, thanks for making the fixes to DML. Are you adding JUnits for
> all the fixes you are making?
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Recent fixes from Alexander made DML much better!
>>
>> I've found one issue but it is not blocker for the release:
>>
>> IGNITE-4362 DML: the multiplication for SET uses the data type for the
>> result from the right side
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4362>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Vladimir,
>> >
>> > Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it?
>> >
>> > —
>> > Denis
>> >
>> > > On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Igniters,
>> > >
>> > > I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks
>> like
>> > > we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which
>> looks
>> > > pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and
>> > > start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
>> > >
>> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340
>> > >
>> > > Vladimir.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <is...@gridgain.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Denis,
>> > >>
>> > >> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was
>> > already
>> > >> resolved
>> > >> by another fix made by Alexander.
>> > >>
>> > >> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
>> > >>
>> > >> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
>> > >> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
>> > >>
>> > >> Best Regards,
>> > >> Igor
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from
>> PHP
>> > >> PDO
>> > >>> side.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The first one is related to DML.
>> > >>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue
>> before
>> > >>> 1.8 is sent for vote.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only.
>> > Igor
>> > >>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
>> > >>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in
>> DSN <
>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> —
>> > >>> Denis
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Hi
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Update for DML testing:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
>> > >>> previous
>> > >>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
>> > >> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>> Vladimir,
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
>> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
>> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote
>> computation
>> > >> is
>> > >>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
>> > >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>> > >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
>> > >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>> > >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> —
>> > >>>>> Denis
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
>> > >>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Folks,
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable
>> tickets
>> > >> you
>> > >>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Vladimir.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <
>> > skozlov@gridgain.com
>> > >>>
>> > >>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Hi
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three
>> > parts
>> > >>> in
>> > >>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
>> > >>>>> following
>> > >>>>>>> unclear points
>> > >>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
>> > >>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
>> > >> ignite-cassandra-store?
>> > >>>>> In
>> > >>>>>>> that case why do not make one module?
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> > >>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already
>> > merged
>> > >>> in
>> > >>>>>>>> 1.8 branch).
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
>> > >>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not
>> fixed).
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> - Alex
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com
>> >:
>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
>> > >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send
>> > >> message
>> > >>>>>>>> because
>> > >>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/
>> > jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
>> > >>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
>> > >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>> > >>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
>> > >> several
>> > >>>>>>>> problems
>> > >>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization
>> in
>> > >>>>>>>> ignite-1.8
>> > >>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for
>> the
>> > >>> next
>> > >>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Any objections?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
>> > >> isapego@gridgain.com
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8.
>> > >> But
>> > >>>>>>> now
>> > >>>>>>>> we
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> have some
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on
>> > them.
>> > >>>>>>> There
>> > >>>>>>>>>> is a
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> ticket for
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <
>> > dmagda@apache.org
>> > >>>
>> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related
>> changes?
>> > >>>>>>> Can I
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> start
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.
>> io/docs/pdo-interoperability
>> > <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> —
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is
>> now
>> > >>>>>>> good
>> > >>>>>>>> to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes
>> will
>> > >> be
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
>> > >>>>>>>> features
>> > >>>>>>>>>> on
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases
>> (shortly):
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <al...@gmail.com>:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
>> > >>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com
>> > >>>>>>>>> :
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
>> > >> seems
>> > >>>>>>>> that
>> > >>>>>>>>>> we
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> are
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the
>> biggest
>> > >>>>>>>>>> remaining
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch
>> > >> for
>> > >>>>>>>> 1.8
>> > >>>>>>>>>> as
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> soon
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it
>> > might
>> > >>>>>>>>>> happen?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
>> > >>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
>> > >>>>>>> Recently
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> there
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> was
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the
>> > difficulties
>> > >>>>>>>>>> related
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
>> > >> versions
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for
>> > >> the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to
>> create a
>> > >>>>>>>> hidden
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> page
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it
>> > visible
>> > >>>>>>>> once
>> > >>>>>>>>>> the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> next
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page
>> with
>> > a
>> > >>>>>>>> suffix
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
>> > >> create
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>> > >>>>>>>>>> td10868.html
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets
>> > merged
>> > >>>>>>>> into
>> > >>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
>> > >>>>>>> overall
>> > >>>>>>>>>> merge
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
>> > >>>>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without
>> DML
>> > >>>>>>> they
>> > >>>>>>>>>> will
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
>> > >> that
>> > >>>>>>>>>> before
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> DML
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
>> > >> merge
>> > >>>>>>> my
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself,
>> > tests
>> > >>>>>>> and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> examples
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> ptupitsyn@apache.org
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
>> > >>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> binary
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
>> > >> 1.8.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
>> > >> can.
>> > >>>>>>>> But I
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
>> <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
>> <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
>> > >>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
>> > >>>>>>> changes
>> > >>>>>>>>>> into
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
>> > >>>>>>>> documentation
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and be
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
>> > >> .NET
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> usability
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
>> > >>>>>>> Ignite
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> users?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
>> jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
>> > <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
>> > <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
>> > >>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone
>> who
>> > >>>>>>> can
>> > >>>>>>>>>> take
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> over
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:
>> > >>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness
>> is
>> > >>>>>>>> mostly
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> about
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to
>> > specify
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> streamer's
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
>> > >>>>>>>> easily).
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after
>> > binary
>> > >>>>>>>> hash
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> codes
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
>> > >>>>>>> branch,
>> > >>>>>>>> I
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> will
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> ask
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live
>> > in
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
>> > >>>>>>> follows:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first
>> version
>> > >> of
>> > >>>>>>>> auto
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
>> > >> very
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> hashing
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
>> > >>>>>>> passed.
>> > >>>>>>>> So
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> could
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>> > >>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>> > >>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>> > >>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>> > >>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> --
>> > >>>> Sergey Kozlov
>> > >>>> GridGain Systems
>> > >>>> www.gridgain.com
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sergey Kozlov
>> GridGain Systems
>> www.gridgain.com
>>
Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Posted by Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@apache.org>.
Alexander, thanks for making the fixes to DML. Are you adding JUnits for
all the fixes you are making?
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Recent fixes from Alexander made DML much better!
>
> I've found one issue but it is not blocker for the release:
>
> IGNITE-4362 DML: the multiplication for SET uses the data type for the
> result from the right side
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4362>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Vladimir,
> >
> > Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it?
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> > > On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks
> like
> > > we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which
> looks
> > > pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and
> > > start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340
> > >
> > > Vladimir.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <is...@gridgain.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Denis,
> > >>
> > >> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was
> > already
> > >> resolved
> > >> by another fix made by Alexander.
> > >>
> > >> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
> > >>
> > >> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
> > >> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Igor
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from
> PHP
> > >> PDO
> > >>> side.
> > >>>
> > >>> The first one is related to DML.
> > >>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
> > >>>
> > >>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue
> before
> > >>> 1.8 is sent for vote.
> > >>>
> > >>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only.
> > Igor
> > >>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
> > >>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in
> DSN <
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
> > >>>
> > >>> —
> > >>> Denis
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Update for DML testing:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
> > >>> previous
> > >>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
> > >> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Vladimir,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote
> computation
> > >> is
> > >>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
> > >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> > >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
> > >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> > >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> —
> > >>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> vozerov@gridgain.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable
> tickets
> > >> you
> > >>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <
> > skozlov@gridgain.com
> > >>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three
> > parts
> > >>> in
> > >>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
> > >>>>> following
> > >>>>>>> unclear points
> > >>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> > >>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
> > >> ignite-cassandra-store?
> > >>>>> In
> > >>>>>>> that case why do not make one module?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already
> > merged
> > >>> in
> > >>>>>>>> 1.8 branch).
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> > >>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not
> fixed).
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com
> >:
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
> > >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send
> > >> message
> > >>>>>>>> because
> > >>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/
> > jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> > >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > >>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
> > >> several
> > >>>>>>>> problems
> > >>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization
> in
> > >>>>>>>> ignite-1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for
> the
> > >>> next
> > >>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Any objections?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
> > >> isapego@gridgain.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8.
> > >> But
> > >>>>>>> now
> > >>>>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>>>> have some
> > >>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on
> > them.
> > >>>>>>> There
> > >>>>>>>>>> is a
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ticket for
> > >>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <
> > dmagda@apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related
> changes?
> > >>>>>>> Can I
> > >>>>>>>>>>> start
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.
> io/docs/pdo-interoperability
> > <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is
> now
> > >>>>>>> good
> > >>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes
> will
> > >> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> > >>>>>>>> features
> > >>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases
> (shortly):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <al...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> > >>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com
> > >>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
> > >> seems
> > >>>>>>>> that
> > >>>>>>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> are
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the
> biggest
> > >>>>>>>>>> remaining
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch
> > >> for
> > >>>>>>>> 1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>> as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> soon
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it
> > might
> > >>>>>>>>>> happen?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> > >>>>>>> Recently
> > >>>>>>>>>>> there
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> was
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the
> > difficulties
> > >>>>>>>>>> related
> > >>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
> > >> versions
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for
> > >> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to
> create a
> > >>>>>>>> hidden
> > >>>>>>>>>>> page
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it
> > visible
> > >>>>>>>> once
> > >>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> next
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page
> with
> > a
> > >>>>>>>> suffix
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
> > >> create
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > >>>>>>>>>> td10868.html
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > >>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets
> > merged
> > >>>>>>>> into
> > >>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> > >>>>>>> overall
> > >>>>>>>>>> merge
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> > >>>>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without
> DML
> > >>>>>>> they
> > >>>>>>>>>> will
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
> > >> that
> > >>>>>>>>>> before
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> DML
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
> > >> merge
> > >>>>>>> my
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> changes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself,
> > tests
> > >>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> examples
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> ptupitsyn@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> > >>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor
> > >>>>>>>>>>> binary
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
> > >> 1.8.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
> > >> can.
> > >>>>>>>> But I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> can't
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> > >>>>>>> changes
> > >>>>>>>>>> into
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> > >>>>>>>> documentation
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
> > >> .NET
> > >>>>>>>>>>> usability
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
> > >>>>>>> Ignite
> > >>>>>>>>>>> users?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
> > <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
> > <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone
> who
> > >>>>>>> can
> > >>>>>>>>>> take
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> over
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:
> > >>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness
> is
> > >>>>>>>> mostly
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> about
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to
> > specify
> > >>>>>>>>>>> streamer's
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> > >>>>>>>> easily).
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after
> > binary
> > >>>>>>>> hash
> > >>>>>>>>>>> codes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> > >>>>>>> branch,
> > >>>>>>>> I
> > >>>>>>>>>>> will
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> ask
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live
> > in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> > >>>>>>> follows:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first
> version
> > >> of
> > >>>>>>>> auto
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
> > >> very
> > >>>>>>>>>>> hashing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> > >>>>>>> passed.
> > >>>>>>>> So
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> could
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> > >>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> > >>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> > >>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> > >>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Sergey Kozlov
> > >>>> GridGain Systems
> > >>>> www.gridgain.com
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sergey Kozlov
> GridGain Systems
> www.gridgain.com
>
Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Posted by Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>.
Hi
Recent fixes from Alexander made DML much better!
I've found one issue but it is not blocker for the release:
IGNITE-4362 DML: the multiplication for SET uses the data type for the
result from the right side
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4362>
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Vladimir,
>
> Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it?
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Igniters,
> >
> > I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks like
> > we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which looks
> > pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and
> > start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340
> >
> > Vladimir.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <is...@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Denis,
> >>
> >> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was
> already
> >> resolved
> >> by another fix made by Alexander.
> >>
> >> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
> >>
> >> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
> >> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Igor
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from PHP
> >> PDO
> >>> side.
> >>>
> >>> The first one is related to DML.
> >>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
> >>>
> >>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue before
> >>> 1.8 is sent for vote.
> >>>
> >>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only.
> Igor
> >>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
> >>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in DSN <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
> >>>
> >>> —
> >>> Denis
> >>>
> >>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi
> >>>>
> >>>> Update for DML testing:
> >>>>
> >>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
> >>> previous
> >>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
> >> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Vladimir,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation
> >> is
> >>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
> >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
> >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> —
> >>>>> Denis
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets
> >> you
> >>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <
> skozlov@gridgain.com
> >>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three
> parts
> >>> in
> >>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
> >>>>> following
> >>>>>>> unclear points
> >>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> >>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
> >> ignite-cassandra-store?
> >>>>> In
> >>>>>>> that case why do not make one module?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already
> merged
> >>> in
> >>>>>>>> 1.8 branch).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> >>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send
> >> message
> >>>>>>>> because
> >>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> >>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
> >> several
> >>>>>>>> problems
> >>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
> >>>>>>>> ignite-1.8
> >>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the
> >>> next
> >>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Any objections?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
> >> isapego@gridgain.com
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8.
> >> But
> >>>>>>> now
> >>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>> have some
> >>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on
> them.
> >>>>>>> There
> >>>>>>>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>>>>> ticket for
> >>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <
> dmagda@apache.org
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
> >>>>>>> Can I
> >>>>>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability
> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
> >>>>>>> good
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will
> >> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> >>>>>>>> features
> >>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <al...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> >>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
> >> seems
> >>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
> >>>>>>>>>> remaining
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch
> >> for
> >>>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>> soon
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it
> might
> >>>>>>>>>> happen?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> >>>>>>> Recently
> >>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the
> difficulties
> >>>>>>>>>> related
> >>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
> >> versions
> >>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for
> >> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
> >>>>>>>> hidden
> >>>>>>>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it
> visible
> >>>>>>>> once
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with
> a
> >>>>>>>> suffix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
> >> create
> >>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> >>>>>>>>>> td10868.html
> >>>>>>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> >>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> >>>>>>>>>>> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets
> merged
> >>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> >>>>>>> overall
> >>>>>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> >>>>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
> >>>>>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
> >> that
> >>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>> DML
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
> >> merge
> >>>>>>> my
> >>>>>>>>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself,
> tests
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> examples
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ptupitsyn@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> >>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor
> >>>>>>>>>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
> >> 1.8.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
> >> can.
> >>>>>>>> But I
> >>>>>>>>>>>> can't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> >>>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> >>>>>>>> documentation
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
> >> .NET
> >>>>>>>>>>> usability
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
> >>>>>>> Ignite
> >>>>>>>>>>> users?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
> >>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>> take
> >>>>>>>>>>>> over
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:
> >>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
> >>>>>>>> mostly
> >>>>>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to
> specify
> >>>>>>>>>>> streamer's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> >>>>>>>> easily).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after
> binary
> >>>>>>>> hash
> >>>>>>>>>>> codes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> >>>>>>> branch,
> >>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ask
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live
> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> >>>>>>> follows:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version
> >> of
> >>>>>>>> auto
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
> >> very
> >>>>>>>>>>> hashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> >>>>>>> passed.
> >>>>>>>> So
> >>>>>>>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
--
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com
Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>.
Vladimir,
Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it?
—
Denis
> On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>
> Igniters,
>
> I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks like
> we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which looks
> pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and
> start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340
>
> Vladimir.
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <is...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>
>> Denis,
>>
>> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was already
>> resolved
>> by another fix made by Alexander.
>>
>> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
>>
>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
>> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Igor
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from PHP
>> PDO
>>> side.
>>>
>>> The first one is related to DML.
>>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
>>>
>>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue before
>>> 1.8 is sent for vote.
>>>
>>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only. Igor
>>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
>>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in DSN <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
>>>
>>> —
>>> Denis
>>>
>>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Update for DML testing:
>>>>
>>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
>>> previous
>>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Vladimir,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
>>>>>
>>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation
>> is
>>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
>>>>>
>>>>> —
>>>>> Denis
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets
>> you
>>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com
>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts
>>> in
>>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
>>>>> following
>>>>>>> unclear points
>>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
>>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
>> ignite-cassandra-store?
>>>>> In
>>>>>>> that case why do not make one module?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged
>>> in
>>>>>>>> 1.8 branch).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
>>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>:
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send
>> message
>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
>>>
>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
>> several
>>>>>>>> problems
>>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
>>>>>>>> ignite-1.8
>>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the
>>> next
>>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
>> isapego@gridgain.com
>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8.
>> But
>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>> have some
>>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
>>>>>>> There
>>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>> ticket for
>>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org
>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
>>>>>>> Can I
>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will
>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
>>>>>>>> features
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
>> seems
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
>>>>>>>>>> remaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch
>> for
>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>> soon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
>>>>>>>>>> happen?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
>>>>>>> Recently
>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
>>>>>>>>>> related
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for
>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
>>>>>>>> hidden
>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
>>>>>>>> suffix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
>> create
>>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html
>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>>>>>>>>>>> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
>>>>>>> overall
>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
>>>>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
>> that
>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>> DML
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
>> merge
>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> examples
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>>>>>>>>>>>> ptupitsyn@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
>>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor
>>>>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
>> 1.8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
>> can.
>>>>>>>> But I
>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
>>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>> and be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
>> .NET
>>>>>>>>>>> usability
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
>>>>>>> Ignite
>>>>>>>>>>> users?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
>>>>>>>> mostly
>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
>>>>>>>>>>> streamer's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
>>>>>>>> easily).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
>>>>>>>> hash
>>>>>>>>>>> codes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
>>>>>>> branch,
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>> ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
>>>>>>> follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version
>> of
>>>>>>>> auto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
>> very
>>>>>>>>>>> hashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
>>>>>>> passed.
>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Posted by Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>.
Igniters,
I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks like
we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which looks
pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and
start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340
Vladimir.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <is...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> Denis,
>
> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was already
> resolved
> by another fix made by Alexander.
>
> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
>
> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
>
> Best Regards,
> Igor
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from PHP
> PDO
> > side.
> >
> > The first one is related to DML.
> > DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
> >
> > Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue before
> > 1.8 is sent for vote.
> >
> > The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only. Igor
> > S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
> > ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in DSN <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> > > On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Update for DML testing:
> > >
> > > IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
> > previous
> > > failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Vladimir,
> > >>
> > >> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
> > >>
> > >> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation
> is
> > >> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
> > >> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> > >> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
> > >> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> > >> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
> > >>
> > >> —
> > >> Denis
> > >>
> > >>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Folks,
> > >>>
> > >>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets
> you
> > >>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
> > >>>
> > >>> Vladimir.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts
> > in
> > >>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
> > >> following
> > >>>> unclear points
> > >>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> > >>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
> ignite-cassandra-store?
> > >> In
> > >>>> that case why do not make one module?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged
> > in
> > >>>>> 1.8 branch).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> > >>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <sk...@gridgain.com>:
> > >>>>>> Hi
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
> > >>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send
> message
> > >>>>> because
> > >>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
> >
> > >>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > >>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
> several
> > >>>>> problems
> > >>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
> > >>>>> ignite-1.8
> > >>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the
> > next
> > >>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Any objections?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
> isapego@gridgain.com
> > >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8.
> But
> > >>>> now
> > >>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>> have some
> > >>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
> > >>>> There
> > >>>>>>> is a
> > >>>>>>>> ticket for
> > >>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>> Igor
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org
> >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Alexander,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
> > >>>> Can I
> > >>>>>>>> start
> > >>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
> > >>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
> > >>>> good
> > >>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will
> be
> > >>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> > >>>>> features
> > >>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > >>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > >>>>>>>>>> <al...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> > >>>> vozerov@gridgain.com
> > >>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
> seems
> > >>>>> that
> > >>>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>> are
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
> > >>>>>>> remaining
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch
> for
> > >>>>> 1.8
> > >>>>>>> as
> > >>>>>>>>> soon
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
> > >>>>>>> happen?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>> dmagda@apache.org
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> > >>>> Recently
> > >>>>>>>> there
> > >>>>>>>>> was
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
> > >>>>>>> related
> > >>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
> versions
> > >>>>>>>>> co-exist at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for
> the
> > >>>>>>>>> documentation
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
> > >>>>> hidden
> > >>>>>>>> page
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
> > >>>>> once
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>> next
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
> > >>>>> suffix
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
> create
> > >>>>>>>>> readme.io <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > >>>>>>> td10868.html
> > >>>>>>>> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > >>>>>>>> td10868.html>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> > >>>>>>>> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
> > >>>>> into
> > >>>>>>> 1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> > >>>> overall
> > >>>>>>> merge
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> > >>>>> isapego@gridgain.com>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
> > >>>> they
> > >>>>>>> will
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
> that
> > >>>>>>> before
> > >>>>>>>>> DML
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
> merge
> > >>>> my
> > >>>>>>>>> changes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
> > >>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>> examples
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > >>>>>>>>> ptupitsyn@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> > >>>> CacheEntryProcessor
> > >>>>>>>> binary
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
> 1.8.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
> can.
> > >>>>> But I
> > >>>>>>>>> can't
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> > >>>> changes
> > >>>>>>> into
> > >>>>>>>>> 1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> > >>>>> documentation
> > >>>>>>>>> and be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
> .NET
> > >>>>>>>> usability
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
> > >>>> Ignite
> > >>>>>>>> users?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com
> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
> > >>>> can
> > >>>>>>> take
> > >>>>>>>>> over
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:
> > >>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
> > >>>>> mostly
> > >>>>>>>>> about
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
> > >>>>>>>> streamer's
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> > >>>>> easily).
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
> > >>>>> hash
> > >>>>>>>> codes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> > >>>> branch,
> > >>>>> I
> > >>>>>>>> will
> > >>>>>>>>> ask
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> > >>>> follows:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version
> of
> > >>>>> auto
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
> very
> > >>>>>>>> hashing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> > >>>> passed.
> > >>>>> So
> > >>>>>>>>> could
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> > >>>>>> GridGain Systems
> > >>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Sergey Kozlov
> > >>>> GridGain Systems
> > >>>> www.gridgain.com
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sergey Kozlov
> > > GridGain Systems
> > > www.gridgain.com
> >
> >
>