You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@mesos.apache.org by Anand Mazumdar <an...@apache.org> on 2017/02/15 18:28:26 UTC

Review Request 56716: Fixed a crash on the default executor due to a failed invariant check.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56716/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.


Bugs: MESOS-7129
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7129


Repository: mesos


Description
-------

There was an incorrect assumption when kiling a task group that
all its other tasks would still be active. Its possible that
some of them terminated successfully earlier.


Diffs
-----

  src/launcher/default_executor.cpp e63cf153831088851863d0956455a024e9bc172a 
  src/tests/default_executor_tests.cpp 1afab8292c7fc15bd16bee4bcd93ce290a233c9a 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56716/diff/


Testing
-------

make check + added test


Thanks,

Anand Mazumdar


Re: Review Request 56716: Fixed a crash on the default executor due to a failed invariant check.

Posted by Vinod Kone <vi...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56716/#review165741
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/tests/default_executor_tests.cpp (line 1238)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/56716/#comment237592>

    s/update/update for each task/
    s/next update/next updates/



src/tests/default_executor_tests.cpp (line 1305)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/56716/#comment237622>

    kinda orthogonal to this fix, but i'm wondering if executor should exit with a non-zero status if any of its tasks exits with non-zero.


- Vinod Kone


On Feb. 15, 2017, 6:28 p.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56716/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 15, 2017, 6:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7129
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7129
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There was an incorrect assumption when kiling a task group that
> all its other tasks would still be active. Its possible that
> some of them terminated successfully earlier.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/launcher/default_executor.cpp e63cf153831088851863d0956455a024e9bc172a 
>   src/tests/default_executor_tests.cpp 1afab8292c7fc15bd16bee4bcd93ce290a233c9a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56716/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check + added test
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anand Mazumdar
> 
>


Re: Review Request 56716: Fixed a crash on the default executor due to a failed invariant check.

Posted by Mesos Reviewbot <re...@mesos.apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56716/#review165762
-----------------------------------------------------------



Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [56716]

Passed command: export OS='ubuntu:14.04' BUILDTOOL='autotools' COMPILER='gcc' CONFIGURATION='--verbose' ENVIRONMENT='GLOG_v=1 MESOS_VERBOSE=1'; ./support/docker-build.sh

- Mesos Reviewbot


On Feb. 15, 2017, 6:28 p.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56716/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 15, 2017, 6:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7129
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7129
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There was an incorrect assumption when kiling a task group that
> all its other tasks would still be active. Its possible that
> some of them terminated successfully earlier.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/launcher/default_executor.cpp e63cf153831088851863d0956455a024e9bc172a 
>   src/tests/default_executor_tests.cpp 1afab8292c7fc15bd16bee4bcd93ce290a233c9a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56716/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check + added test
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anand Mazumdar
> 
>