You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commons-dev@ws.apache.org by "Ruwan Linton (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/02/25 20:20:27 UTC

[jira] Assigned: (WSCOMMONS-524) ServiceTaskManager fails to commit if session is transacted and always rollsback when using swiftMQ 2.1.3

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSCOMMONS-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Ruwan Linton reassigned WSCOMMONS-524:
--------------------------------------

    Assignee: Ruwan Linton

> ServiceTaskManager fails to commit if session is transacted and always rollsback when using swiftMQ 2.1.3
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WSCOMMONS-524
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSCOMMONS-524
>             Project: WS-Commons
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Transport
>    Affects Versions: Transports 1.0, Transports 1.1
>         Environment: SwiftMQ 2.1.3, 
>            Reporter: Paul Inglis
>            Assignee: Ruwan Linton
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Transports 1.1
>
>         Attachments: ServiceTaskManager.patch.txt
>
>
> Hi,
> I have an issue reading JMS messages from an old JMS 1.0 implementation provided by swiftMQ as part of a transaction.  The transaction always rolls back and never commits a read from the queue.
> Looking at ServiceTaskManager, in the method handleMessage, the logic it takes is:
>   1. pass message to jmsMessageReceiver for processing
>   2. close the consumer
>   3. commit or rollback transaction on session.
>   4. close session
>   5. close connection
> It appears though that at stage 2 with swiftMQ the open transaction is rolledback.  This means the commit in stage 3 does nothing.
> The solution is swap stages 2 and 3 such that the open transaction is commited before the consumer is closed. 
> I noticted this issue on the verison of Transports (1.0) that ships with WSO2's ESB product but it appears that the same issue applies to 1.1 as well.
> Paul Inglis

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.