You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Willem Jiang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/11/07 02:52:59 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CAMEL-10446) Need to consolidate header mapping logic between Camel and CXF messages

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15642913#comment-15642913 ] 

Willem Jiang commented on CAMEL-10446:
--------------------------------------

Hi Tadayoshi,

I totally agree with you. The message mapping code is rotten we need to do some clean up :)

Willem


> Need to consolidate header mapping logic between Camel and CXF messages
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-10446
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10446
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: camel-cxf, camel-cxfrs
>    Affects Versions: 2.18.0
>            Reporter: Tadayoshi Sato
>
> In the current codebase of {{camel-cxf}} and {{camel-cxf-transport}}, the header mapping logic between CXF and Camel messages is scattered around {{DefaultCxfRsBinding}}, {{CxfHeaderHelper}}, and other classes. It should be consolidated into a single place, e.g. {{CxfHeaderHelper}}, as much as possible.
> I'd like to call it a "bug" because due to this lack of unified header mappings I observe some CXF-specific headers accidentally flow into the Camel world and vice versa.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)