You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/07/20 16:29:21 UTC

[GitHub] [nifi] emiliosetiadarma commented on pull request #5206: NIFI-8695: Adding context to sensitive property providers

emiliosetiadarma commented on pull request #5206:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5206#issuecomment-883529638


   Hey @gresockj ! I was wondering about potentially adding a `protect(final String unprotectedValue)` that calls `protect(final String unprotectedValue, final ProtectedPropertyContext context)` with default context for the `SensitivePropertyProvider` interface? 
   
   I was thinking this would eliminate the need to modify existing SPPs which don't require this information, and addition of SPPs which dynamically protect/unprotect data vs. encrypting/decrypting them at rest could simply be a matter of adding a new `PropertyProtectionScheme`?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org