You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@archiva.apache.org by James William Dumay <ja...@atlassian.com> on 2008/02/28 02:08:51 UTC

Lunce 2.1 for trunk

Hey guys,
Just looking over the change log for Lucene 2.1 - might be worth an
upgrade.

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_2_1_0/CHANGES.txt


Any objections?

James

Re: Lunce 2.1 for trunk

Posted by James William Dumay <ja...@atlassian.com>.
This upgrade also works for the 1.0.x branch.

Thanks
James


On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:40 +1100, James William Dumay wrote:
> Issue and patch can be found here:
> 
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-720
> 
> Ive tested this functionally and it appears to work great.
> 
> James
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:15 +1100, James William Dumay wrote:
> > After a few words on IRC with Joakim we should jump straight to 2.3.1
> > 
> > 
> > James
> > 
> > On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:08 +1100, James William Dumay wrote:
> > > Hey guys,
> > > Just looking over the change log for Lucene 2.1 - might be worth an
> > > upgrade.
> > > 
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_2_1_0/CHANGES.txt
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Any objections?
> > > 
> > > James
> > > 
> > 
>

Re: Lunce 2.1 for trunk

Posted by James William Dumay <ja...@atlassian.com>.
Issue and patch can be found here:

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-720

Ive tested this functionally and it appears to work great.

James


On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:15 +1100, James William Dumay wrote:
> After a few words on IRC with Joakim we should jump straight to 2.3.1
> 
> 
> James
> 
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:08 +1100, James William Dumay wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> > Just looking over the change log for Lucene 2.1 - might be worth an
> > upgrade.
> > 
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_2_1_0/CHANGES.txt
> > 
> > 
> > Any objections?
> > 
> > James
> > 
>

Re: Lunce 2.1 for trunk

Posted by Joakim Erdfelt <jo...@erdfelt.com>.
+1 for going all the way to Lucene 2.3.1

- Joakim

James William Dumay wrote:
> After a few words on IRC with Joakim we should jump straight to 2.3.1
>
>
> James
>
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:08 +1100, James William Dumay wrote:
>   
>> Hey guys,
>> Just looking over the change log for Lucene 2.1 - might be worth an
>> upgrade.
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_2_1_0/CHANGES.txt
>>
>>
>> Any objections?
>>
>> James
>>
>>     
>
>

Re: Lunce 2.1 for trunk

Posted by James William Dumay <ja...@atlassian.com>.
After a few words on IRC with Joakim we should jump straight to 2.3.1


James

On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:08 +1100, James William Dumay wrote:
> Hey guys,
> Just looking over the change log for Lucene 2.1 - might be worth an
> upgrade.
> 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_2_1_0/CHANGES.txt
> 
> 
> Any objections?
> 
> James
>

Re: Lunce 2.1 for trunk

Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
It's probably worth going all the way up to 2.3.1 and re-testing things.

On 28/02/2008, at 12:08 PM, James William Dumay wrote:

> Hey guys,
> Just looking over the change log for Lucene 2.1 - might be worth an
> upgrade.
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_2_1_0/CHANGES.txt
>
>
> Any objections?
>
> James
>

--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/