You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cassandra.apache.org by Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com> on 2010/11/11 21:43:05 UTC
[VOTE] 0.6.8 RC1
We had a regression in the way of CASSANDRA-1719[1] make its way into
the last release. With that fixed now, I'd like to propose the following
artifacts for 0.6.8.
SVN:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.6@r1034097
0.6.8 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
I'd be happy to make an exception here and shorten the voting period to
expedite this release (say 24 hours?), but only if there is consensus.
I don't want anyone to feel they weren't given enough time to lodge a
veto.
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1719
[2]: http://goo.gl/ssWSW (CHANGES.txt)
--
Eric Evans
eevans@rackspace.com
Re: [VOTE] 0.6.8 RC1
Posted by Stu Hood <st...@gmail.com>.
-1
1722 was just backported to the 0.6 branch (r1034172): I think we'll need to
reroll... sorry!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1722
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1722>
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 14:44 -0600, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> > For the record, the regression was caused by 1622, noticed in testing
> > for 1719, and fixed in 1727. :)
>
> What's that you say? You want a recipe for carrot cake?
>
> --
> Eric Evans
> eevans@rackspace.com
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.6.8 RC1
Posted by Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com>.
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 14:44 -0600, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> For the record, the regression was caused by 1622, noticed in testing
> for 1719, and fixed in 1727. :)
What's that you say? You want a recipe for carrot cake?
--
Eric Evans
eevans@rackspace.com
Re: [VOTE] 0.6.8 RC1
Posted by Jonathan Ellis <jb...@gmail.com>.
For the record, the regression was caused by 1622, noticed in testing
for 1719, and fixed in 1727. :)
+1 on the release from me, and I'm okay with expediting it.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>
> We had a regression in the way of CASSANDRA-1719[1] make its way into
> the last release. With that fixed now, I'd like to propose the following
> artifacts for 0.6.8.
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.6@r1034097
> 0.6.8 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
>
> I'd be happy to make an exception here and shorten the voting period to
> expedite this release (say 24 hours?), but only if there is consensus.
> I don't want anyone to feel they weren't given enough time to lodge a
> veto.
>
> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1719
> [2]: http://goo.gl/ssWSW (CHANGES.txt)
>
>
> --
> Eric Evans
> eevans@rackspace.com
>
>
--
Jonathan Ellis
Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support
http://riptano.com
Re: [VOTE] 0.6.8 RC1
Posted by Brandon Williams <dr...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.6@r1034097
> 0.6.8 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
+1
> I'd be happy to make an exception here and shorten the voting period to
> expedite this release (say 24 hours?), but only if there is consensus.
> I don't want anyone to feel they weren't given enough time to lodge a
> veto.
>
+1 to expediting.
-Brandon