You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by "Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org> on 2006/04/11 19:21:19 UTC
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-180) Clarify/decide how to express
portType and port QNames in SCDL
Clarify/decide how to express portType and port QNames in SCDL
--------------------------------------------------------------
Key: TUSCANY-180
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-180
Project: Tuscany
Type: Bug
Components: Specification
Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Assigned to: Michael John Edwards
Several proposals are on the table and have been discussed on the dev list there: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200604.mbox/%3c443ABD13.5040005@apache.org%3e
- the WSDL 2.0 notation, as described in the current SCA 0.9 spec
- a "legacy" {ns}localname notation
- the usual XMLish notation xmlns:p=ns at the top of the SCDL doc or an enclosing scope, and a p:localname notation
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-180) Clarify/decide how to express
portType and port QNames in SCDL
Posted by "Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-180?page=all ]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino updated TUSCANY-180:
-------------------------------------------
Fix Version: 0.91
Version: 0.91
For our release we need to implement one option, stick to it, and document it.
> Clarify/decide how to express portType and port QNames in SCDL
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-180
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-180
> Project: Tuscany
> Type: Bug
> Components: Specification
> Versions: 0.91
> Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> Assignee: Michael John Edwards
> Fix For: 0.91
>
> Several proposals are on the table and have been discussed on the dev list there: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200604.mbox/%3c443ABD13.5040005@apache.org%3e
> - the WSDL 2.0 notation, as described in the current SCA 0.9 spec
> - a "legacy" {ns}localname notation
> - the usual XMLish notation xmlns:p=ns at the top of the SCDL doc or an enclosing scope, and a p:localname notation
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-180) Clarify/decide how to express
portType and port QNames in SCDL
Posted by "Michael John Edwards (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-180?page=comments#action_12378621 ]
Michael John Edwards commented on TUSCANY-180:
----------------------------------------------
I'd like to ask folks what is wrong with the notation currently defined by the SCA Assembly spec, which follows the WSDL 2.0 spec.
The advantages I see are:
a) We're not inventing anything new here - it simply follows what is laid down by the WSDL 2.0 spec
b) No use of namespaces - hence no need to author the namespace references at the top of the SCDL files
Are there good reasons to choose something else?
Yours, Mike.
> Clarify/decide how to express portType and port QNames in SCDL
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-180
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-180
> Project: Tuscany
> Type: Bug
> Components: Specification
> Versions: M1
> Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> Assignee: Michael John Edwards
> Fix For: M1
>
> Several proposals are on the table and have been discussed on the dev list there: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200604.mbox/%3c443ABD13.5040005@apache.org%3e
> - the WSDL 2.0 notation, as described in the current SCA 0.9 spec
> - a "legacy" {ns}localname notation
> - the usual XMLish notation xmlns:p=ns at the top of the SCDL doc or an enclosing scope, and a p:localname notation
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-180) Clarify/decide how to express
portType and port QNames in SCDL
Posted by "Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-180?page=all ]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino updated TUSCANY-180:
-------------------------------------------
Starting to work on a fix, will add support for the notation described in the spec.
> Clarify/decide how to express portType and port QNames in SCDL
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-180
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-180
> Project: Tuscany
> Type: Bug
> Components: Specification
> Versions: M1
> Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> Assignee: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> Fix For: M1
>
> Several proposals are on the table and have been discussed on the dev list there: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200604.mbox/%3c443ABD13.5040005@apache.org%3e
> - the WSDL 2.0 notation, as described in the current SCA 0.9 spec
> - a "legacy" {ns}localname notation
> - the usual XMLish notation xmlns:p=ns at the top of the SCDL doc or an enclosing scope, and a p:localname notation
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-180) Clarify/decide how to express
portType and port QNames in SCDL
Posted by "Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-180?page=all ]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino reassigned TUSCANY-180:
----------------------------------------------
Assign To: Jean-Sebastien Delfino (was: Michael John Edwards)
> Clarify/decide how to express portType and port QNames in SCDL
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-180
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-180
> Project: Tuscany
> Type: Bug
> Components: Specification
> Versions: M1
> Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> Assignee: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> Fix For: M1
>
> Several proposals are on the table and have been discussed on the dev list there: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200604.mbox/%3c443ABD13.5040005@apache.org%3e
> - the WSDL 2.0 notation, as described in the current SCA 0.9 spec
> - a "legacy" {ns}localname notation
> - the usual XMLish notation xmlns:p=ns at the top of the SCDL doc or an enclosing scope, and a p:localname notation
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-180) Clarify/decide how to express
portType and port QNames in SCDL
Posted by "Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-180?page=all ]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-180:
--------------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed, we now support the WSDL 2.0 syntax described in the spec.
I left the old syntax for now to avoid breaking those who are using it.
> Clarify/decide how to express portType and port QNames in SCDL
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-180
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-180
> Project: Tuscany
> Type: Bug
> Components: Specification
> Versions: Java-M1
> Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> Assignee: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> Fix For: Java-M1
>
> Several proposals are on the table and have been discussed on the dev list there: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200604.mbox/%3c443ABD13.5040005@apache.org%3e
> - the WSDL 2.0 notation, as described in the current SCA 0.9 spec
> - a "legacy" {ns}localname notation
> - the usual XMLish notation xmlns:p=ns at the top of the SCDL doc or an enclosing scope, and a p:localname notation
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira