You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tinkerpop.apache.org by "Yang Xia (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/04/21 23:21:00 UTC
[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-2893) Incorrectly comparing a counted value with multiple predicates
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Yang Xia closed TINKERPOP-2893.
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.7.0
3.6.3
3.5.6
Resolution: Fixed
> Incorrectly comparing a counted value with multiple predicates
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-2893
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2893
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.5.5
> Reporter: Lei Tang
> Assignee: Ken Hu
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.7.0, 3.6.3, 3.5.6
>
>
> We use a composition of two predicates inside(-1,1).and(lt(-1)) to filter numbers that are greater than -1 and less -1. Obviously, no values satisfy this condition. Therefore, we expect Tinkergraph returns an empty set. However, a vertex is returned.
> {code:java}
> gremlin> :> g.V().where(__.in('knows').count().is(inside(-1,1).and(lt(-1))))
> ==>v[0] {code}
> The graph of this example is as following.
> {code:java}
> Vertex bob = g.addV("person").property("name", "Bob").next(); // v[0]
> Vertex alice = g.addV("person").property("name", "Alice").next(); // v[1]
> Edge edge1 = g.addE("knows").from(bob).to(alice).next();{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)