You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2001/07/19 18:50:50 UTC
backporting runtime serialized accept directive to 1.3
I have a patch that implements the "backport" of making serialize
accepts a runtime parameter. I don't consider the 1.3 tree a "dead"
one, and agree that:
1. Intensive development on 1.3 is discouraged
2. And new features added to 1.3 should only be done if ported
also to 2.0
Yet, I think that this addition (yes, OK, *feature*) makes sense.
Anyone going to shoot me down?
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither"
Re: backporting runtime serialized accept directive to 1.3
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
+1 in concept/.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Jagielski" <ji...@jaguNET.com>
To: <ne...@apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 12:50 PM
Subject: backporting runtime serialized accept directive to 1.3
> I have a patch that implements the "backport" of making serialize
> accepts a runtime parameter. I don't consider the 1.3 tree a "dead"
> one, and agree that:
>
> 1. Intensive development on 1.3 is discouraged
> 2. And new features added to 1.3 should only be done if ported
> also to 2.0
>
> Yet, I think that this addition (yes, OK, *feature*) makes sense.
> Anyone going to shoot me down?
> --
> ===========================================================================
> Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
> "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
> will lose both and deserve neither"
>