You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@logging.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/01/07 08:26:51 UTC

[GitHub] [logging-log4j2] benjaminr-ps opened a new pull request #689: [LOG4J2-3319] Add support for log4j 1.2 API bundle in Eclipse IDE

benjaminr-ps opened a new pull request #689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/689


   This will add the "Eclipse-ExtensibleAPI" header to the manifest of "core" bundle, to allow any fragement (resp. the log4j 1.2 bridge) to extend the API of core bundle.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [logging-log4j2] benjaminr-ps commented on pull request #689: [LOG4J2-3319] Add support for log4j 1.2 API bundle in Eclipse IDE

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
benjaminr-ps commented on pull request #689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/689#issuecomment-1008738139


   No, the change is made in **log4j-core**, only.
   
   But have seen that several other libraries, like "log4j-appserver" or "log4j-cassandra" or ..., would benefit from this change, if developed within Eclipse IDE (resp. with their PDE tooling).
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [logging-log4j2] garydgregory commented on pull request #689: [LOG4J2-3319] Add support for log4j 1.2 API bundle in Eclipse IDE

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
garydgregory commented on pull request #689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/689#issuecomment-1007870825


   Should other modules include this type of change? 
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [logging-log4j2] garydgregory commented on pull request #689: [LOG4J2-3319] Add support for log4j 1.2 API bundle in Eclipse IDE

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
garydgregory commented on pull request #689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/689#issuecomment-1009064814


   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3319


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [logging-log4j2] garydgregory commented on pull request #689: [LOG4J2-3319] Add support for log4j 1.2 API bundle in Eclipse IDE

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
garydgregory commented on pull request #689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/689#issuecomment-1007870825


   Should other modules include this type of change? 
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [logging-log4j2] jvz commented on pull request #689: [LOG4J2-3319] Add support for log4j 1.2 API bundle in Eclipse IDE

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
jvz commented on pull request #689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/689#issuecomment-1019397848


   This looks like it should work. @garydgregory the fragments thing has to do with modules scanning for non-public bits for the most part. Generally, that means the 2.x plugin system needs the fragment hack to find and load plugins, but 3.x can rely on service definitions instead.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org