You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by Raghu Angadi <ra...@yahoo-inc.com> on 2008/09/23 23:41:55 UTC
Exception for HADOOP-4006 to go into feature froze 0.19 branch.
HADOOP-4006 does some code reorg, mainly HDFS. It was ready to be
committed for 0.19 before the 5 pm deadline for 0.19 last Friday. But I
messed it up committed it around 5:37pm. 0.19 was branched around 5:10
and I didn't notice it.
This patch modifies or renames quite a few constants used throughout
HDFS. So most patches that go into 0.19 will conflict with trunk. There
is no functionality change in this patch.
I propose to have an exception for this patch and commit it to 0.19. I
take full responsibility for messing up the commit.
thanks,
Raghu.
Re: Exception for HADOOP-4006 to go into feature froze 0.19 branch.
Posted by Raghu Angadi <ra...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
> On Sep 23, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Raghu Angadi wrote:
>
>> I propose to have an exception for this patch and commit it to 0.19. I
>> take full responsibility for messing up the commit.
>
> I'm +1 to granting the exception for 4006 (and the follow up 4242).
Thanks. I committed HADOOP-4006 and HADOOP-4242 to 0.19. updated
CHANGES.txt accordingly on 0.19 and trunk.
Raghu.
Re: Exception for HADOOP-4006 to go into feature froze 0.19 branch.
Posted by Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>.
On Sep 23, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Raghu Angadi wrote:
> I propose to have an exception for this patch and commit it to 0.19.
> I take full responsibility for messing up the commit.
I'm +1 to granting the exception for 4006 (and the follow up 4242).
-- Owen
Re: Exception for HADOOP-4006 to go into feature froze 0.19 branch.
Posted by Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org>.
+1 I'm okay with this going into the branch.
Doug
Raghu Angadi wrote:
>
> HADOOP-4006 does some code reorg, mainly HDFS. It was ready to be
> committed for 0.19 before the 5 pm deadline for 0.19 last Friday. But I
> messed it up committed it around 5:37pm. 0.19 was branched around 5:10
> and I didn't notice it.
>
> This patch modifies or renames quite a few constants used throughout
> HDFS. So most patches that go into 0.19 will conflict with trunk. There
> is no functionality change in this patch.
>
> I propose to have an exception for this patch and commit it to 0.19. I
> take full responsibility for messing up the commit.
>
> thanks,
> Raghu.