You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to current-testers@httpd.apache.org by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2005/02/13 21:09:36 UTC
Apache 2.0.53/Win32/.msi+.exe installers
Dearest testing community;
at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ you will find new Win32
installers for the apache_2.0.53 release, and the new Win32
source tarball (buildable from command line on VC5+ with
nmake -f makefile.win).
Please validate and report, before I push this out live.
Mea Culpa this is running behind, we have both the svn change
which I had to contend with, an incomplete apr-iconv release
which had to be completed, and this is the *first* release
of 2.0.x using the InstallShield X product (previous releases
were created with InstallShield for Windows Installer.)
As with most 'automatic conversions' not everything that is
converted magically becomes magically correct. Although it
seems this installer is stable, wider testing is needed due
to the changeover.
Please cc: me in all replies to avoid moderation. Thanks!
Bill
Re: Apache 2.0.53/Win32/.msi+.exe installers
Posted by Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca>.
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Dearest testing community;
>
> at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ you will find new Win32
> installers for the apache_2.0.53 release, and the new Win32
> source tarball (buildable from command line on VC5+ with
> nmake -f makefile.win).
>
> Please validate and report, before I push this out live.
> Mea Culpa this is running behind, we have both the svn change
> which I had to contend with, an incomplete apr-iconv release
> which had to be completed, and this is the *first* release
> of 2.0.x using the InstallShield X product (previous releases
> were created with InstallShield for Windows Installer.)
>
> As with most 'automatic conversions' not everything that is
> converted magically becomes magically correct. Although it
> seems this installer is stable, wider testing is needed due
> to the changeover.
>
> Please cc: me in all replies to avoid moderation. Thanks!
>
> Bill
For me, both the .msi installer and the build from the
sources (using VC++ 6) worked fine.
--
best regards,
randy kobes
Re: Apache 2.0.53/Win32/.msi+.exe installers
Posted by Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca>.
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Dearest testing community;
>
> at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ you will find new Win32
> installers for the apache_2.0.53 release, and the new Win32
> source tarball (buildable from command line on VC5+ with
> nmake -f makefile.win).
>
> Please validate and report, before I push this out live.
> Mea Culpa this is running behind, we have both the svn change
> which I had to contend with, an incomplete apr-iconv release
> which had to be completed, and this is the *first* release
> of 2.0.x using the InstallShield X product (previous releases
> were created with InstallShield for Windows Installer.)
>
> As with most 'automatic conversions' not everything that is
> converted magically becomes magically correct. Although it
> seems this installer is stable, wider testing is needed due
> to the changeover.
>
> Please cc: me in all replies to avoid moderation. Thanks!
>
> Bill
For me, both the .msi installer and the build from the
sources (using VC++ 6) worked fine.
--
best regards,
randy kobes
Re: Apache 2.0.53/Win32/.msi+.exe installers
Posted by Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca>.
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Dearest testing community;
>
> at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ you will find new Win32
> installers for the apache_2.0.53 release, and the new Win32
> source tarball (buildable from command line on VC5+ with
> nmake -f makefile.win).
>
> Please validate and report, before I push this out live.
> Mea Culpa this is running behind, we have both the svn change
> which I had to contend with, an incomplete apr-iconv release
> which had to be completed, and this is the *first* release
> of 2.0.x using the InstallShield X product (previous releases
> were created with InstallShield for Windows Installer.)
>
> As with most 'automatic conversions' not everything that is
> converted magically becomes magically correct. Although it
> seems this installer is stable, wider testing is needed due
> to the changeover.
>
> Please cc: me in all replies to avoid moderation. Thanks!
>
> Bill
For me, both the .msi installer and the build from the
sources (using VC++ 6) worked fine.
--
best regards,
randy kobes
Re: Apache 2.0.53/Win32/.msi+.exe installers
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Given Mladen's and Randy's testing, including my own, I've
pushed these out to binaries/win32/... thanks all.
At 05:53 AM 2/14/2005, Mladen Turk wrote:
>William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ you will find new Win32
>>installers for the apache_2.0.53 release, and the new Win32
>>source tarball (buildable from command line on VC5+ with
>>nmake -f makefile.win).
>
>Install and builds (tested VC6 and VS2003).
>Even more it works :)!
>
>Cheers,
>Mladen.
>
Re: Apache 2.0.53/Win32/.msi+.exe installers
Posted by Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ you will find new Win32
> installers for the apache_2.0.53 release, and the new Win32
> source tarball (buildable from command line on VC5+ with
> nmake -f makefile.win).
>
Install and builds (tested VC6 and VS2003).
Even more it works :)!
Cheers,
Mladen.