Status of Tomahawk testing with RI using Continuum

[Paul Spencer <pa...@apache.org>]

Status of Tomahawk testing with RI using Continuum.

I am in the process of adding "Build Definitions" in Continuum that
will test Tomahawk and the Tomahawk sandbox against the 1.1 RI.  This is
done by adding the argument -Djsf=ri to the definition.

***
* Completed
***
1) Filed issued related to 1.1 RI testing with Tomahawk
        http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-998

2) Adding the 1.1 RI configuration to the Tomahawk project POM

3) Added a build definition to Tomahawk Sandbox using the 1.1 RI

4) Filed Continuum issues related to the lack of Build Definition information
    in the Continuum results.  This is important because it may be hard, if not
    impossible, to determine which JSF implementation was used during a build.
       http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1278
       http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1279
***
* To Do:
***
1) File issues for failures exposed by the following test when
    using the 1.1 RI.
       testDefaultRenderer(org.apache.myfaces.component.html.ext.HtmlInputHiddenTest)
       testDefaultRenderer(org.apache.myfaces.component.html.ext.HtmlMessageTest)
       testDefaultRenderer(org.apache.myfaces.component.html.ext.HtmlMessagesTest)

    Note: The test can be run locally by adding -Djsf=ri to the mvn command

2) Added a build definition to Tomahawk Core using the 1.1 RI

***
* Should we:
***
1) Added a build definition to Tomahawk Core and SandBox using the 1.2 RI?

2) Added a build definition to Tomahawk Core using the MyFaces 1.2/2.0?

2) Added a build definition to Sandbox15 using the 1.2 RI?

4) Add testing with the 1.1 and/or 1.2 RI on other subprojects, i.e. Tobago?

Paul Spencer