You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by John Sisson <jr...@gmail.com> on 2006/02/20 08:33:02 UTC

Re: svn commit: r378746 - /geronimo/trunk/etc/project.properties

Was there a particular reason why we are upgrading the version (not that 
I have a problem with it)? 

IMHO we should have a JIRA for this so it is clear to users it was 
upgraded in the release notes.

Regards,

John

jgenender@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jgenender
> Date: Sat Feb 18 10:02:03 2006
> New Revision: 378746
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378746&view=rev
> Log:
> Update to Tomcat 5.5.15
>
> Modified:
>     geronimo/trunk/etc/project.properties
>
> Modified: geronimo/trunk/etc/project.properties
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/geronimo/trunk/etc/project.properties?rev=378746&r1=378745&r2=378746&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- geronimo/trunk/etc/project.properties (original)
> +++ geronimo/trunk/etc/project.properties Sat Feb 18 10:02:03 2006
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
>  howl_version=0.1.11
>  #security:
>  hsqldb_version=1.7.2.2
> -jasper_version=5.5.12
> +jasper_version=5.5.15
>  javacc_version=2.1
>  jdbm_version=0.20-dev
>  jdom_version=1.0
> @@ -170,8 +170,8 @@
>  standard_taglibs_version=1.1.1
>  stax_version=1.1.1-dev
>  stax_api_version=1.0
> -tomcat_ajp_version=5.5.12
> -tomcat_version=5.5.12
> +tomcat_ajp_version=5.5.15
> +tomcat_version=5.5.15
>  tomcat_servlet_examples_version=5.5.15
>  tomcat_jsp_examples_version=5.5.15
>  backport_util_concurrent_version=2.0_01_pd
>
>
>
>   



Re: svn commit: r378746 - /geronimo/trunk/etc/project.properties

Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.

John Sisson wrote:
> Was there a particular reason why we are upgrading the version (not that
> I have a problem with it)?

Yes, because it was currently at 5.5.12 in HEAD which is a broken
release and it was discussed that 5.5.15 contains the fix.  HEAD was
never "downgraded" to 5.5.9 and was left "as-is" in hopes of a
work-around or fix.  It was agreed upon that as soon as 5.5.15 was
officially released and was available via ibiblio, that we would
upgrade.  Sorry if this wasn't clarified in this list...maybe too much
IRC and separate lists being used (yeah I know...should keep it on this
list).

> IMHO we should have a JIRA for this so it is clear to users it was
> upgraded in the release notes.
> 

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1640


> Regards,
> 
> John
> 
> jgenender@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jgenender
>> Date: Sat Feb 18 10:02:03 2006
>> New Revision: 378746
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378746&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Update to Tomcat 5.5.15
>>
>> Modified:
>>     geronimo/trunk/etc/project.properties
>>
>> Modified: geronimo/trunk/etc/project.properties
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/geronimo/trunk/etc/project.properties?rev=378746&r1=378745&r2=378746&view=diff
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>>
>> --- geronimo/trunk/etc/project.properties (original)
>> +++ geronimo/trunk/etc/project.properties Sat Feb 18 10:02:03 2006
>> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
>>  howl_version=0.1.11
>>  #security:
>>  hsqldb_version=1.7.2.2
>> -jasper_version=5.5.12
>> +jasper_version=5.5.15
>>  javacc_version=2.1
>>  jdbm_version=0.20-dev
>>  jdom_version=1.0
>> @@ -170,8 +170,8 @@
>>  standard_taglibs_version=1.1.1
>>  stax_version=1.1.1-dev
>>  stax_api_version=1.0
>> -tomcat_ajp_version=5.5.12
>> -tomcat_version=5.5.12
>> +tomcat_ajp_version=5.5.15
>> +tomcat_version=5.5.15
>>  tomcat_servlet_examples_version=5.5.15
>>  tomcat_jsp_examples_version=5.5.15
>>  backport_util_concurrent_version=2.0_01_pd
>>
>>
>>
>>   
> 

Re: svn commit: r378746 - /geronimo/trunk/etc/project.properties

Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.

Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> 2006/2/20, John Sisson <jr...@gmail.com>:
> 
>> IMHO we should have a JIRA for this so it is clear to users it was
>> upgraded in the release notes.
> 
> +100000000
> 
> Any major upgrade, refactoring, etc. ought to have its JIRA item so
> that the release mgmt is much, much easier with JIRA.

Yeah but this is not a major upgrade or refactoring.  Its a bug fix
release from Tomcat (note the revision number) that fixes one minor bug.
 Regardless, I agree that it should be in JIRA...so it is.

> 
>> John
> 
> Jacek
> 
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.laskowski.org.pl

Re: svn commit: r378746 - /geronimo/trunk/etc/project.properties

Posted by Jacek Laskowski <el...@gmail.com>.
2006/2/20, John Sisson <jr...@gmail.com>:

> IMHO we should have a JIRA for this so it is clear to users it was
> upgraded in the release notes.

+100000000

Any major upgrade, refactoring, etc. ought to have its JIRA item so
that the release mgmt is much, much easier with JIRA.

> John

Jacek

--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.org.pl