You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Stu Hood (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/12 06:25:33 UTC

[jira] Reopened: (CASSANDRA-1600) Merge get_indexed_slices with get_range_slices

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Stu Hood reopened CASSANDRA-1600:
---------------------------------


> Merge get_indexed_slices with get_range_slices
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-1600
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1600
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: API
>            Reporter: Stu Hood
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.7.0
>
>         Attachments: 0001-Add-optional-IndexClause-to-KeyRange-and-serialize-w.patch, 0002-Drop-the-IndexClause.count-parameter.patch, 0003-Execute-RangeSliceCommands-using-scan-when-an-IndexC.patch, 0004-Remove-get_indexed_slices-method.patch, 0005-Update-system-tests-to-use-get_range_slices.patch, 0006-Remove-start_key-from-IndexClause-for-the-start_key-.patch
>
>
> From a comment on 1157:
> {quote}
> IndexClause only has a start key for get_indexed_slices, but it would seem that the reasoning behind using 'KeyRange' for get_range_slices applies there as well, since if you know the range you care about in the primary index, you don't want to continue scanning until you exhaust 'count' (or the cluster).
> Since it would appear that get_indexed_slices would benefit from a KeyRange, why not smash get_(range|indexed)_slices together, and make IndexClause an optional field on KeyRange?
> {quote}

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.