You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID> on 2021/04/19 05:33:20 UTC

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Hello, reviving this thread.

I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>

We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
really blocking us.

If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in 3.3.1
(I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
please shout out.

Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too. There
are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread for
hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <he...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
>
> Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to trunk
> and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have made
> the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we have
> tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
> rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
> production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
>
> I think it's good time to add this feature.
>
> Thanks
> Hemanth Boyina
>
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi David,
> >
> > >> Still hoping for help here:
> >
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> >
> > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
> >
> > -Vinay
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Still hoping for help here:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > >
> > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it forward.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
> release,
> > as
> > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
> quirks
> > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
> regressions
> > on
> > > > IPv4?
> > > >
> > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the last
> mail,
> > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We have
> done
> > a
> > > > good
> > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable and
> used
> > > by
> > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is a
> good
> > > time
> > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM discovery
> with
> > > > retry
> > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
> > > release. I
> > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
> > stability
> > > > we
> > > > > >> can
> > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
> using
> > > > these
> > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in bigger
> > > > > clusters.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
> > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
> > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > Bilwa
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if anybody
> has
> > > some
> > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
> > > sunilg@apache.org>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > Thanks
> > > > > >> >> > Sunil
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
> > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
> > hackathon
> > > > > >> where we
> > > > > >> >> > try
> > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review time
> > from
> > > > the
> > > > > >> >> people
> > > > > >> >> > > with
> > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the code
> > > > (Stack?)
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing, hackathon,
> > > > testing).
> > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> >> > > S
> > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
> > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
> > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
> > > hadoop-thirdparty
> > > > > too
> > > > > >> >> > before.
> > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of it.
> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago, and as
> of
> > > now
> > > > > >> we've
> > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
> > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A number
> of
> > > > > >> >> downstreamers
> > > > > >> >> > > are
> > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the guava
> > > > version
> > > > > >> >> > conflict
> > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1 before
> the
> > > > diff
> > > > > >> >> becomes
> > > > > >> >> > > even
> > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
> blockers
> > > > for a
> > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
> > > > > >> >> > > > (using
> > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
> > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
> > > > > >> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the 3.3.1
> > RM?
> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe the
> ARM
> > > > build
> > > > > >> >> > process.
> > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
> > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > --
> > -Vinay
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Back at this. The Hadoop thirdparty 1.1.0 is released.

We have one real blocker for the 3.3.1 release (HDFS-15790 Make
ProtobufRpcEngineProtos and ProtobufRpcEngineProtos2 Co-Exist
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790>)
I tried to rebase the PR but it didn't work like I wanted. Some help is
needed there. If either Vinay comes back to rebase the PR, or if someone
else can take over the PR, that would be great.

Meanwhile, I'll cut a branch for 3.3.1 later. If everything works out fine,
I should be able to make a RC0 by tonight (which doesn't contain
HDFS-15790) so you guys can quickly check out.

The first RC will probably not have the aarch64 binary. I don't have much
experience with that.

Cheers,
Wei-Chiu



On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 9:04 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com>
wrote:

> Hello it's me again.
>
> While working on the hadoop-thirdparty release, I would like to make
> progress on the Hadoop 3.3.1 release in parallel as well.
> Looking at the jira dashboard, I think the only real blocker is HDFS-15790
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2767
>
> I'll try to review the remaining jiras and push out those that don't have
> much progress today.
>
> Thanks all!
> Weichiu
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:57 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Billie and Viraj,
>>
>> As of today we are at 657 resolved jiras in 3.3.1
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HADOOP%2C%20HDFS%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved)%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)
>> There are so many new features (
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+3.3+Release) I
>> counted 10, that it is barely a dot release.
>>
>> Please make every effort to backport the said jiras to branch-3.3. I'd
>> like to cut the branch sooner than later. I'd also call for more frequent
>> releases. At the current development pace, a dot release every quarter
>> would make sense IMO.
>>
>> Given the number of release blockers, I propose a tentative code freeze
>> date: end of next Friday. After that I'd like to cut the branch and make an
>> RC.
>>
>> Thoughts? I can't do this all alone. If you find things that are worth
>> stopping the release, please tag the jira with the label 'release-blocker'.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.
>>>
>>> Billie
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
>>> <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello, reviving this thread.
>>> >
>>> > I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
>>> > Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
>>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>>> >
>>> > We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
>>> > 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
>>> > really blocking us.
>>> >
>>> > If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
>>> 3.3.1
>>> > (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed
>>> some)
>>> > please shout out.
>>> >
>>> > Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.
>>> There
>>> > are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread
>>> for
>>> > hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <
>>> hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
>>> > >
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
>>> > >
>>> > > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
>>> > trunk
>>> > > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have
>>> made
>>> > > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we
>>> have
>>> > > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
>>> > > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
>>> > > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
>>> > >
>>> > > I think it's good time to add this feature.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks
>>> > > Hemanth Boyina
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi David,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > >> Still hoping for help here:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -Vinay
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Hello,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Still hoping for help here:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
>>> > forward.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
>>> > > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
>>> > > release,
>>> > > > as
>>> > > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
>>> > > quirks
>>> > > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
>>> > > regressions
>>> > > > on
>>> > > > > > IPv4?
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>>> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the
>>> last
>>> > > mail,
>>> > > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We
>>> have
>>> > > done
>>> > > > a
>>> > > > > > good
>>> > > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable
>>> and
>>> > > used
>>> > > > > by
>>> > > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it
>>> is a
>>> > > good
>>> > > > > time
>>> > > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Thanks
>>> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>>> > > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM
>>> discovery
>>> > > with
>>> > > > > > retry
>>> > > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming
>>> 3.1.1
>>> > > > > release. I
>>> > > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
>>> > > > stability
>>> > > > > > we
>>> > > > > > > >> can
>>> > > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <
>>> stbilwa@gmail.com>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have
>>> been
>>> > > using
>>> > > > > > these
>>> > > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
>>> > bigger
>>> > > > > > > clusters.
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
>>> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
>>> > > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node
>>> -
>>> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > >> > Bilwa
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if
>>> anybody
>>> > > has
>>> > > > > some
>>> > > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
>>> > > > > sunilg@apache.org>
>>> > > > > > > >> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <
>>> stack@duboce.net>
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
>>> > > > hackathon
>>> > > > > > > >> where we
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > try
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
>>> > time
>>> > > > from
>>> > > > > > the
>>> > > > > > > >> >> people
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > with
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
>>> > code
>>> > > > > > (Stack?)
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing,
>>> hackathon,
>>> > > > > > testing).
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > S
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
>>> > > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
>>> > > > > hadoop-thirdparty
>>> > > > > > > too
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > before.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of
>>> it.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
>>> > > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago,
>>> and as
>>> > > of
>>> > > > > now
>>> > > > > > > >> we've
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A
>>> number
>>> > > of
>>> > > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > are
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
>>> > guava
>>> > > > > > version
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > conflict
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1
>>> before
>>> > > the
>>> > > > > > diff
>>> > > > > > > >> >> becomes
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > even
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
>>> > > blockers
>>> > > > > > for a
>>> > > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
>>> > > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
>>> > 3.3.1
>>> > > > RM?
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not
>>> describe the
>>> > > ARM
>>> > > > > > build
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > process.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> > > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> > > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> --
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> --
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > -Vinay
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Back at this. The Hadoop thirdparty 1.1.0 is released.

We have one real blocker for the 3.3.1 release (HDFS-15790 Make
ProtobufRpcEngineProtos and ProtobufRpcEngineProtos2 Co-Exist
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790>)
I tried to rebase the PR but it didn't work like I wanted. Some help is
needed there. If either Vinay comes back to rebase the PR, or if someone
else can take over the PR, that would be great.

Meanwhile, I'll cut a branch for 3.3.1 later. If everything works out fine,
I should be able to make a RC0 by tonight (which doesn't contain
HDFS-15790) so you guys can quickly check out.

The first RC will probably not have the aarch64 binary. I don't have much
experience with that.

Cheers,
Wei-Chiu



On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 9:04 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com>
wrote:

> Hello it's me again.
>
> While working on the hadoop-thirdparty release, I would like to make
> progress on the Hadoop 3.3.1 release in parallel as well.
> Looking at the jira dashboard, I think the only real blocker is HDFS-15790
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2767
>
> I'll try to review the remaining jiras and push out those that don't have
> much progress today.
>
> Thanks all!
> Weichiu
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:57 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Billie and Viraj,
>>
>> As of today we are at 657 resolved jiras in 3.3.1
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HADOOP%2C%20HDFS%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved)%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)
>> There are so many new features (
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+3.3+Release) I
>> counted 10, that it is barely a dot release.
>>
>> Please make every effort to backport the said jiras to branch-3.3. I'd
>> like to cut the branch sooner than later. I'd also call for more frequent
>> releases. At the current development pace, a dot release every quarter
>> would make sense IMO.
>>
>> Given the number of release blockers, I propose a tentative code freeze
>> date: end of next Friday. After that I'd like to cut the branch and make an
>> RC.
>>
>> Thoughts? I can't do this all alone. If you find things that are worth
>> stopping the release, please tag the jira with the label 'release-blocker'.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.
>>>
>>> Billie
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
>>> <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello, reviving this thread.
>>> >
>>> > I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
>>> > Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
>>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>>> >
>>> > We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
>>> > 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
>>> > really blocking us.
>>> >
>>> > If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
>>> 3.3.1
>>> > (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed
>>> some)
>>> > please shout out.
>>> >
>>> > Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.
>>> There
>>> > are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread
>>> for
>>> > hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <
>>> hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
>>> > >
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
>>> > >
>>> > > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
>>> > trunk
>>> > > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have
>>> made
>>> > > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we
>>> have
>>> > > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
>>> > > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
>>> > > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
>>> > >
>>> > > I think it's good time to add this feature.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks
>>> > > Hemanth Boyina
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi David,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > >> Still hoping for help here:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -Vinay
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Hello,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Still hoping for help here:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
>>> > forward.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
>>> > > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
>>> > > release,
>>> > > > as
>>> > > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
>>> > > quirks
>>> > > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
>>> > > regressions
>>> > > > on
>>> > > > > > IPv4?
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>>> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the
>>> last
>>> > > mail,
>>> > > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We
>>> have
>>> > > done
>>> > > > a
>>> > > > > > good
>>> > > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable
>>> and
>>> > > used
>>> > > > > by
>>> > > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it
>>> is a
>>> > > good
>>> > > > > time
>>> > > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Thanks
>>> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>>> > > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM
>>> discovery
>>> > > with
>>> > > > > > retry
>>> > > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming
>>> 3.1.1
>>> > > > > release. I
>>> > > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
>>> > > > stability
>>> > > > > > we
>>> > > > > > > >> can
>>> > > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <
>>> stbilwa@gmail.com>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have
>>> been
>>> > > using
>>> > > > > > these
>>> > > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
>>> > bigger
>>> > > > > > > clusters.
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
>>> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
>>> > > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node
>>> -
>>> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > >> > Bilwa
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if
>>> anybody
>>> > > has
>>> > > > > some
>>> > > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
>>> > > > > sunilg@apache.org>
>>> > > > > > > >> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <
>>> stack@duboce.net>
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
>>> > > > hackathon
>>> > > > > > > >> where we
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > try
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
>>> > time
>>> > > > from
>>> > > > > > the
>>> > > > > > > >> >> people
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > with
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
>>> > code
>>> > > > > > (Stack?)
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing,
>>> hackathon,
>>> > > > > > testing).
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > S
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
>>> > > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
>>> > > > > hadoop-thirdparty
>>> > > > > > > too
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > before.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of
>>> it.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
>>> > > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago,
>>> and as
>>> > > of
>>> > > > > now
>>> > > > > > > >> we've
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A
>>> number
>>> > > of
>>> > > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > are
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
>>> > guava
>>> > > > > > version
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > conflict
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1
>>> before
>>> > > the
>>> > > > > > diff
>>> > > > > > > >> >> becomes
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > even
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
>>> > > blockers
>>> > > > > > for a
>>> > > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
>>> > > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
>>> > 3.3.1
>>> > > > RM?
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not
>>> describe the
>>> > > ARM
>>> > > > > > build
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > process.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> > > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> > > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> --
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> --
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > -Vinay
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Back at this. The Hadoop thirdparty 1.1.0 is released.

We have one real blocker for the 3.3.1 release (HDFS-15790 Make
ProtobufRpcEngineProtos and ProtobufRpcEngineProtos2 Co-Exist
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790>)
I tried to rebase the PR but it didn't work like I wanted. Some help is
needed there. If either Vinay comes back to rebase the PR, or if someone
else can take over the PR, that would be great.

Meanwhile, I'll cut a branch for 3.3.1 later. If everything works out fine,
I should be able to make a RC0 by tonight (which doesn't contain
HDFS-15790) so you guys can quickly check out.

The first RC will probably not have the aarch64 binary. I don't have much
experience with that.

Cheers,
Wei-Chiu



On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 9:04 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com>
wrote:

> Hello it's me again.
>
> While working on the hadoop-thirdparty release, I would like to make
> progress on the Hadoop 3.3.1 release in parallel as well.
> Looking at the jira dashboard, I think the only real blocker is HDFS-15790
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2767
>
> I'll try to review the remaining jiras and push out those that don't have
> much progress today.
>
> Thanks all!
> Weichiu
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:57 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Billie and Viraj,
>>
>> As of today we are at 657 resolved jiras in 3.3.1
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HADOOP%2C%20HDFS%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved)%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)
>> There are so many new features (
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+3.3+Release) I
>> counted 10, that it is barely a dot release.
>>
>> Please make every effort to backport the said jiras to branch-3.3. I'd
>> like to cut the branch sooner than later. I'd also call for more frequent
>> releases. At the current development pace, a dot release every quarter
>> would make sense IMO.
>>
>> Given the number of release blockers, I propose a tentative code freeze
>> date: end of next Friday. After that I'd like to cut the branch and make an
>> RC.
>>
>> Thoughts? I can't do this all alone. If you find things that are worth
>> stopping the release, please tag the jira with the label 'release-blocker'.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.
>>>
>>> Billie
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
>>> <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello, reviving this thread.
>>> >
>>> > I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
>>> > Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
>>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>>> >
>>> > We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
>>> > 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
>>> > really blocking us.
>>> >
>>> > If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
>>> 3.3.1
>>> > (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed
>>> some)
>>> > please shout out.
>>> >
>>> > Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.
>>> There
>>> > are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread
>>> for
>>> > hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <
>>> hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
>>> > >
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
>>> > >
>>> > > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
>>> > trunk
>>> > > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have
>>> made
>>> > > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we
>>> have
>>> > > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
>>> > > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
>>> > > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
>>> > >
>>> > > I think it's good time to add this feature.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks
>>> > > Hemanth Boyina
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi David,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > >> Still hoping for help here:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -Vinay
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Hello,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Still hoping for help here:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
>>> > forward.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
>>> > > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
>>> > > release,
>>> > > > as
>>> > > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
>>> > > quirks
>>> > > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
>>> > > regressions
>>> > > > on
>>> > > > > > IPv4?
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>>> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the
>>> last
>>> > > mail,
>>> > > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We
>>> have
>>> > > done
>>> > > > a
>>> > > > > > good
>>> > > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable
>>> and
>>> > > used
>>> > > > > by
>>> > > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it
>>> is a
>>> > > good
>>> > > > > time
>>> > > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Thanks
>>> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>>> > > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM
>>> discovery
>>> > > with
>>> > > > > > retry
>>> > > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming
>>> 3.1.1
>>> > > > > release. I
>>> > > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
>>> > > > stability
>>> > > > > > we
>>> > > > > > > >> can
>>> > > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <
>>> stbilwa@gmail.com>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have
>>> been
>>> > > using
>>> > > > > > these
>>> > > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
>>> > bigger
>>> > > > > > > clusters.
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
>>> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
>>> > > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node
>>> -
>>> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > >> > Bilwa
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if
>>> anybody
>>> > > has
>>> > > > > some
>>> > > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
>>> > > > > sunilg@apache.org>
>>> > > > > > > >> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <
>>> stack@duboce.net>
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
>>> > > > hackathon
>>> > > > > > > >> where we
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > try
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
>>> > time
>>> > > > from
>>> > > > > > the
>>> > > > > > > >> >> people
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > with
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
>>> > code
>>> > > > > > (Stack?)
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing,
>>> hackathon,
>>> > > > > > testing).
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > S
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
>>> > > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
>>> > > > > hadoop-thirdparty
>>> > > > > > > too
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > before.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of
>>> it.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
>>> > > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago,
>>> and as
>>> > > of
>>> > > > > now
>>> > > > > > > >> we've
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A
>>> number
>>> > > of
>>> > > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > are
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
>>> > guava
>>> > > > > > version
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > conflict
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1
>>> before
>>> > > the
>>> > > > > > diff
>>> > > > > > > >> >> becomes
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > even
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
>>> > > blockers
>>> > > > > > for a
>>> > > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
>>> > > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
>>> > 3.3.1
>>> > > > RM?
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not
>>> describe the
>>> > > ARM
>>> > > > > > build
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > process.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> > > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> > > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> --
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> --
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > -Vinay
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Back at this. The Hadoop thirdparty 1.1.0 is released.

We have one real blocker for the 3.3.1 release (HDFS-15790 Make
ProtobufRpcEngineProtos and ProtobufRpcEngineProtos2 Co-Exist
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790>)
I tried to rebase the PR but it didn't work like I wanted. Some help is
needed there. If either Vinay comes back to rebase the PR, or if someone
else can take over the PR, that would be great.

Meanwhile, I'll cut a branch for 3.3.1 later. If everything works out fine,
I should be able to make a RC0 by tonight (which doesn't contain
HDFS-15790) so you guys can quickly check out.

The first RC will probably not have the aarch64 binary. I don't have much
experience with that.

Cheers,
Wei-Chiu



On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 9:04 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com>
wrote:

> Hello it's me again.
>
> While working on the hadoop-thirdparty release, I would like to make
> progress on the Hadoop 3.3.1 release in parallel as well.
> Looking at the jira dashboard, I think the only real blocker is HDFS-15790
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2767
>
> I'll try to review the remaining jiras and push out those that don't have
> much progress today.
>
> Thanks all!
> Weichiu
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:57 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Billie and Viraj,
>>
>> As of today we are at 657 resolved jiras in 3.3.1
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HADOOP%2C%20HDFS%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved)%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)
>> There are so many new features (
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+3.3+Release) I
>> counted 10, that it is barely a dot release.
>>
>> Please make every effort to backport the said jiras to branch-3.3. I'd
>> like to cut the branch sooner than later. I'd also call for more frequent
>> releases. At the current development pace, a dot release every quarter
>> would make sense IMO.
>>
>> Given the number of release blockers, I propose a tentative code freeze
>> date: end of next Friday. After that I'd like to cut the branch and make an
>> RC.
>>
>> Thoughts? I can't do this all alone. If you find things that are worth
>> stopping the release, please tag the jira with the label 'release-blocker'.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.
>>>
>>> Billie
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
>>> <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello, reviving this thread.
>>> >
>>> > I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
>>> > Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
>>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>>> >
>>> > We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
>>> > 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
>>> > really blocking us.
>>> >
>>> > If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
>>> 3.3.1
>>> > (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed
>>> some)
>>> > please shout out.
>>> >
>>> > Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.
>>> There
>>> > are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread
>>> for
>>> > hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <
>>> hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
>>> > >
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
>>> > >
>>> > > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
>>> > trunk
>>> > > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have
>>> made
>>> > > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we
>>> have
>>> > > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
>>> > > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
>>> > > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
>>> > >
>>> > > I think it's good time to add this feature.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks
>>> > > Hemanth Boyina
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi David,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > >> Still hoping for help here:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -Vinay
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Hello,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Still hoping for help here:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
>>> > forward.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
>>> > > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
>>> > > release,
>>> > > > as
>>> > > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
>>> > > quirks
>>> > > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
>>> > > regressions
>>> > > > on
>>> > > > > > IPv4?
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>>> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the
>>> last
>>> > > mail,
>>> > > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We
>>> have
>>> > > done
>>> > > > a
>>> > > > > > good
>>> > > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable
>>> and
>>> > > used
>>> > > > > by
>>> > > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it
>>> is a
>>> > > good
>>> > > > > time
>>> > > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Thanks
>>> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>>> > > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM
>>> discovery
>>> > > with
>>> > > > > > retry
>>> > > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming
>>> 3.1.1
>>> > > > > release. I
>>> > > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
>>> > > > stability
>>> > > > > > we
>>> > > > > > > >> can
>>> > > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <
>>> stbilwa@gmail.com>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have
>>> been
>>> > > using
>>> > > > > > these
>>> > > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
>>> > bigger
>>> > > > > > > clusters.
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
>>> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
>>> > > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node
>>> -
>>> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > >> > Bilwa
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if
>>> anybody
>>> > > has
>>> > > > > some
>>> > > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
>>> > > > > sunilg@apache.org>
>>> > > > > > > >> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <
>>> stack@duboce.net>
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
>>> > > > hackathon
>>> > > > > > > >> where we
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > try
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
>>> > time
>>> > > > from
>>> > > > > > the
>>> > > > > > > >> >> people
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > with
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
>>> > code
>>> > > > > > (Stack?)
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing,
>>> hackathon,
>>> > > > > > testing).
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > S
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
>>> > > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
>>> > > > > hadoop-thirdparty
>>> > > > > > > too
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > before.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of
>>> it.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
>>> > > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago,
>>> and as
>>> > > of
>>> > > > > now
>>> > > > > > > >> we've
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A
>>> number
>>> > > of
>>> > > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > are
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
>>> > guava
>>> > > > > > version
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > conflict
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1
>>> before
>>> > > the
>>> > > > > > diff
>>> > > > > > > >> >> becomes
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > even
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
>>> > > blockers
>>> > > > > > for a
>>> > > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
>>> > > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
>>> > 3.3.1
>>> > > > RM?
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not
>>> describe the
>>> > > ARM
>>> > > > > > build
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > process.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> > > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> > > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> --
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>>> > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> --
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > -Vinay
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Hello it's me again.

While working on the hadoop-thirdparty release, I would like to make
progress on the Hadoop 3.3.1 release in parallel as well.
Looking at the jira dashboard, I think the only real blocker is HDFS-15790
https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2767

I'll try to review the remaining jiras and push out those that don't have
much progress today.

Thanks all!
Weichiu


On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:57 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com>
wrote:

> Billie and Viraj,
>
> As of today we are at 657 resolved jiras in 3.3.1
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HADOOP%2C%20HDFS%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved)%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)
> There are so many new features (
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+3.3+Release) I
> counted 10, that it is barely a dot release.
>
> Please make every effort to backport the said jiras to branch-3.3. I'd
> like to cut the branch sooner than later. I'd also call for more frequent
> releases. At the current development pace, a dot release every quarter
> would make sense IMO.
>
> Given the number of release blockers, I propose a tentative code freeze
> date: end of next Friday. After that I'd like to cut the branch and make an
> RC.
>
> Thoughts? I can't do this all alone. If you find things that are worth
> stopping the release, please tag the jira with the label 'release-blocker'.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.
>>
>> Billie
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
>> <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello, reviving this thread.
>> >
>> > I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
>> > Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>> >
>> > We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
>> > 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
>> > really blocking us.
>> >
>> > If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
>> 3.3.1
>> > (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed
>> some)
>> > please shout out.
>> >
>> > Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.
>> There
>> > are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread
>> for
>> > hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <
>> hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
>> > >
>> > > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
>> > trunk
>> > > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have
>> made
>> > > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we
>> have
>> > > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
>> > > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
>> > > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
>> > >
>> > > I think it's good time to add this feature.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > > Hemanth Boyina
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi David,
>> > > >
>> > > > >> Still hoping for help here:
>> > > >
>> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>> > > >
>> > > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
>> > > >
>> > > > -Vinay
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hello,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Still hoping for help here:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
>> > forward.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
>> > > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
>> > > release,
>> > > > as
>> > > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
>> > > quirks
>> > > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
>> > > regressions
>> > > > on
>> > > > > > IPv4?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the
>> last
>> > > mail,
>> > > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We
>> have
>> > > done
>> > > > a
>> > > > > > good
>> > > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable
>> and
>> > > used
>> > > > > by
>> > > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is
>> a
>> > > good
>> > > > > time
>> > > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>> > > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM
>> discovery
>> > > with
>> > > > > > retry
>> > > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
>> > > > > release. I
>> > > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
>> > > > stability
>> > > > > > we
>> > > > > > > >> can
>> > > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <
>> stbilwa@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
>> > > using
>> > > > > > these
>> > > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
>> > bigger
>> > > > > > > clusters.
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
>> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
>> > > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
>> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >> > Bilwa
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if
>> anybody
>> > > has
>> > > > > some
>> > > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
>> > > > > sunilg@apache.org>
>> > > > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
>> > > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <
>> stack@duboce.net>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
>> > > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
>> > > > hackathon
>> > > > > > > >> where we
>> > > > > > > >> >> > try
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
>> > time
>> > > > from
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > >> >> people
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > with
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
>> > code
>> > > > > > (Stack?)
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing,
>> hackathon,
>> > > > > > testing).
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > S
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
>> > > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
>> > > > > hadoop-thirdparty
>> > > > > > > too
>> > > > > > > >> >> > before.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of
>> it.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
>> > > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago,
>> and as
>> > > of
>> > > > > now
>> > > > > > > >> we've
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A
>> number
>> > > of
>> > > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > are
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
>> > guava
>> > > > > > version
>> > > > > > > >> >> > conflict
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1
>> before
>> > > the
>> > > > > > diff
>> > > > > > > >> >> becomes
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > even
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
>> > > blockers
>> > > > > > for a
>> > > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
>> > > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
>> > 3.3.1
>> > > > RM?
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe
>> the
>> > > ARM
>> > > > > > build
>> > > > > > > >> >> > process.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> > > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> > > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> --
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> --
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > -Vinay
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Hello it's me again.

While working on the hadoop-thirdparty release, I would like to make
progress on the Hadoop 3.3.1 release in parallel as well.
Looking at the jira dashboard, I think the only real blocker is HDFS-15790
https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2767

I'll try to review the remaining jiras and push out those that don't have
much progress today.

Thanks all!
Weichiu


On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:57 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com>
wrote:

> Billie and Viraj,
>
> As of today we are at 657 resolved jiras in 3.3.1
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HADOOP%2C%20HDFS%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved)%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)
> There are so many new features (
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+3.3+Release) I
> counted 10, that it is barely a dot release.
>
> Please make every effort to backport the said jiras to branch-3.3. I'd
> like to cut the branch sooner than later. I'd also call for more frequent
> releases. At the current development pace, a dot release every quarter
> would make sense IMO.
>
> Given the number of release blockers, I propose a tentative code freeze
> date: end of next Friday. After that I'd like to cut the branch and make an
> RC.
>
> Thoughts? I can't do this all alone. If you find things that are worth
> stopping the release, please tag the jira with the label 'release-blocker'.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.
>>
>> Billie
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
>> <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello, reviving this thread.
>> >
>> > I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
>> > Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>> >
>> > We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
>> > 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
>> > really blocking us.
>> >
>> > If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
>> 3.3.1
>> > (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed
>> some)
>> > please shout out.
>> >
>> > Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.
>> There
>> > are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread
>> for
>> > hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <
>> hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
>> > >
>> > > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
>> > trunk
>> > > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have
>> made
>> > > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we
>> have
>> > > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
>> > > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
>> > > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
>> > >
>> > > I think it's good time to add this feature.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > > Hemanth Boyina
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi David,
>> > > >
>> > > > >> Still hoping for help here:
>> > > >
>> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>> > > >
>> > > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
>> > > >
>> > > > -Vinay
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hello,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Still hoping for help here:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
>> > forward.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
>> > > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
>> > > release,
>> > > > as
>> > > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
>> > > quirks
>> > > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
>> > > regressions
>> > > > on
>> > > > > > IPv4?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the
>> last
>> > > mail,
>> > > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We
>> have
>> > > done
>> > > > a
>> > > > > > good
>> > > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable
>> and
>> > > used
>> > > > > by
>> > > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is
>> a
>> > > good
>> > > > > time
>> > > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>> > > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM
>> discovery
>> > > with
>> > > > > > retry
>> > > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
>> > > > > release. I
>> > > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
>> > > > stability
>> > > > > > we
>> > > > > > > >> can
>> > > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <
>> stbilwa@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
>> > > using
>> > > > > > these
>> > > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
>> > bigger
>> > > > > > > clusters.
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
>> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
>> > > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
>> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >> > Bilwa
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if
>> anybody
>> > > has
>> > > > > some
>> > > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
>> > > > > sunilg@apache.org>
>> > > > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
>> > > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <
>> stack@duboce.net>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
>> > > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
>> > > > hackathon
>> > > > > > > >> where we
>> > > > > > > >> >> > try
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
>> > time
>> > > > from
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > >> >> people
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > with
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
>> > code
>> > > > > > (Stack?)
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing,
>> hackathon,
>> > > > > > testing).
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > S
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
>> > > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
>> > > > > hadoop-thirdparty
>> > > > > > > too
>> > > > > > > >> >> > before.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of
>> it.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
>> > > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago,
>> and as
>> > > of
>> > > > > now
>> > > > > > > >> we've
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A
>> number
>> > > of
>> > > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > are
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
>> > guava
>> > > > > > version
>> > > > > > > >> >> > conflict
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1
>> before
>> > > the
>> > > > > > diff
>> > > > > > > >> >> becomes
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > even
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
>> > > blockers
>> > > > > > for a
>> > > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
>> > > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
>> > 3.3.1
>> > > > RM?
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe
>> the
>> > > ARM
>> > > > > > build
>> > > > > > > >> >> > process.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> > > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> > > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> --
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> --
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > -Vinay
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Hello it's me again.

While working on the hadoop-thirdparty release, I would like to make
progress on the Hadoop 3.3.1 release in parallel as well.
Looking at the jira dashboard, I think the only real blocker is HDFS-15790
https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2767

I'll try to review the remaining jiras and push out those that don't have
much progress today.

Thanks all!
Weichiu


On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:57 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com>
wrote:

> Billie and Viraj,
>
> As of today we are at 657 resolved jiras in 3.3.1
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HADOOP%2C%20HDFS%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved)%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)
> There are so many new features (
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+3.3+Release) I
> counted 10, that it is barely a dot release.
>
> Please make every effort to backport the said jiras to branch-3.3. I'd
> like to cut the branch sooner than later. I'd also call for more frequent
> releases. At the current development pace, a dot release every quarter
> would make sense IMO.
>
> Given the number of release blockers, I propose a tentative code freeze
> date: end of next Friday. After that I'd like to cut the branch and make an
> RC.
>
> Thoughts? I can't do this all alone. If you find things that are worth
> stopping the release, please tag the jira with the label 'release-blocker'.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.
>>
>> Billie
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
>> <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello, reviving this thread.
>> >
>> > I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
>> > Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>> >
>> > We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
>> > 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
>> > really blocking us.
>> >
>> > If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
>> 3.3.1
>> > (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed
>> some)
>> > please shout out.
>> >
>> > Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.
>> There
>> > are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread
>> for
>> > hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <
>> hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
>> > >
>> > > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
>> > trunk
>> > > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have
>> made
>> > > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we
>> have
>> > > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
>> > > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
>> > > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
>> > >
>> > > I think it's good time to add this feature.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > > Hemanth Boyina
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi David,
>> > > >
>> > > > >> Still hoping for help here:
>> > > >
>> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>> > > >
>> > > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
>> > > >
>> > > > -Vinay
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hello,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Still hoping for help here:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
>> > forward.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
>> > > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
>> > > release,
>> > > > as
>> > > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
>> > > quirks
>> > > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
>> > > regressions
>> > > > on
>> > > > > > IPv4?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the
>> last
>> > > mail,
>> > > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We
>> have
>> > > done
>> > > > a
>> > > > > > good
>> > > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable
>> and
>> > > used
>> > > > > by
>> > > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is
>> a
>> > > good
>> > > > > time
>> > > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>> > > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM
>> discovery
>> > > with
>> > > > > > retry
>> > > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
>> > > > > release. I
>> > > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
>> > > > stability
>> > > > > > we
>> > > > > > > >> can
>> > > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <
>> stbilwa@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
>> > > using
>> > > > > > these
>> > > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
>> > bigger
>> > > > > > > clusters.
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
>> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
>> > > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
>> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >> > Bilwa
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if
>> anybody
>> > > has
>> > > > > some
>> > > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
>> > > > > sunilg@apache.org>
>> > > > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
>> > > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <
>> stack@duboce.net>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
>> > > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
>> > > > hackathon
>> > > > > > > >> where we
>> > > > > > > >> >> > try
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
>> > time
>> > > > from
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > >> >> people
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > with
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
>> > code
>> > > > > > (Stack?)
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing,
>> hackathon,
>> > > > > > testing).
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > S
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
>> > > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
>> > > > > hadoop-thirdparty
>> > > > > > > too
>> > > > > > > >> >> > before.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of
>> it.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
>> > > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago,
>> and as
>> > > of
>> > > > > now
>> > > > > > > >> we've
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A
>> number
>> > > of
>> > > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > are
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
>> > guava
>> > > > > > version
>> > > > > > > >> >> > conflict
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1
>> before
>> > > the
>> > > > > > diff
>> > > > > > > >> >> becomes
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > even
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
>> > > blockers
>> > > > > > for a
>> > > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
>> > > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
>> > 3.3.1
>> > > > RM?
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe
>> the
>> > > ARM
>> > > > > > build
>> > > > > > > >> >> > process.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> > > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> > > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> --
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> --
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > -Vinay
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Hello it's me again.

While working on the hadoop-thirdparty release, I would like to make
progress on the Hadoop 3.3.1 release in parallel as well.
Looking at the jira dashboard, I think the only real blocker is HDFS-15790
https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2767

I'll try to review the remaining jiras and push out those that don't have
much progress today.

Thanks all!
Weichiu


On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:57 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com>
wrote:

> Billie and Viraj,
>
> As of today we are at 657 resolved jiras in 3.3.1
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HADOOP%2C%20HDFS%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved)%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)
> There are so many new features (
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+3.3+Release) I
> counted 10, that it is barely a dot release.
>
> Please make every effort to backport the said jiras to branch-3.3. I'd
> like to cut the branch sooner than later. I'd also call for more frequent
> releases. At the current development pace, a dot release every quarter
> would make sense IMO.
>
> Given the number of release blockers, I propose a tentative code freeze
> date: end of next Friday. After that I'd like to cut the branch and make an
> RC.
>
> Thoughts? I can't do this all alone. If you find things that are worth
> stopping the release, please tag the jira with the label 'release-blocker'.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.
>>
>> Billie
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
>> <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello, reviving this thread.
>> >
>> > I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
>> > Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>> >
>> > We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
>> > 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
>> > really blocking us.
>> >
>> > If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
>> 3.3.1
>> > (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed
>> some)
>> > please shout out.
>> >
>> > Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.
>> There
>> > are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread
>> for
>> > hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <
>> hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
>> > >
>> > > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
>> > trunk
>> > > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have
>> made
>> > > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we
>> have
>> > > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
>> > > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
>> > > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
>> > >
>> > > I think it's good time to add this feature.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > > Hemanth Boyina
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi David,
>> > > >
>> > > > >> Still hoping for help here:
>> > > >
>> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>> > > >
>> > > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
>> > > >
>> > > > -Vinay
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hello,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Still hoping for help here:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
>> > forward.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
>> > > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
>> > > release,
>> > > > as
>> > > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
>> > > quirks
>> > > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
>> > > regressions
>> > > > on
>> > > > > > IPv4?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the
>> last
>> > > mail,
>> > > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We
>> have
>> > > done
>> > > > a
>> > > > > > good
>> > > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable
>> and
>> > > used
>> > > > > by
>> > > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is
>> a
>> > > good
>> > > > > time
>> > > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
>> > > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM
>> discovery
>> > > with
>> > > > > > retry
>> > > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
>> > > > > release. I
>> > > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
>> > > > stability
>> > > > > > we
>> > > > > > > >> can
>> > > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <
>> stbilwa@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
>> > > using
>> > > > > > these
>> > > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
>> > bigger
>> > > > > > > clusters.
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
>> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
>> > > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
>> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >> > Bilwa
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
>> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if
>> anybody
>> > > has
>> > > > > some
>> > > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
>> > > > > sunilg@apache.org>
>> > > > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
>> > > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <
>> stack@duboce.net>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
>> > > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
>> > > > hackathon
>> > > > > > > >> where we
>> > > > > > > >> >> > try
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
>> > time
>> > > > from
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > >> >> people
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > with
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
>> > code
>> > > > > > (Stack?)
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing,
>> hackathon,
>> > > > > > testing).
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > S
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
>> > > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
>> > > > > hadoop-thirdparty
>> > > > > > > too
>> > > > > > > >> >> > before.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of
>> it.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
>> > > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago,
>> and as
>> > > of
>> > > > > now
>> > > > > > > >> we've
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A
>> number
>> > > of
>> > > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > are
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
>> > guava
>> > > > > > version
>> > > > > > > >> >> > conflict
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1
>> before
>> > > the
>> > > > > > diff
>> > > > > > > >> >> becomes
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > even
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
>> > > blockers
>> > > > > > for a
>> > > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
>> > > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
>> > 3.3.1
>> > > > RM?
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe
>> the
>> > > ARM
>> > > > > > build
>> > > > > > > >> >> > process.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> > > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> > > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> --
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> --
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > -Vinay
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Billie and Viraj,

As of today we are at 657 resolved jiras in 3.3.1
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HADOOP%2C%20HDFS%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved)%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)
There are so many new features (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+3.3+Release) I
counted 10, that it is barely a dot release.

Please make every effort to backport the said jiras to branch-3.3. I'd like
to cut the branch sooner than later. I'd also call for more frequent
releases. At the current development pace, a dot release every quarter
would make sense IMO.

Given the number of release blockers, I propose a tentative code freeze
date: end of next Friday. After that I'd like to cut the branch and make an
RC.

Thoughts? I can't do this all alone. If you find things that are worth
stopping the release, please tag the jira with the label 'release-blocker'.



On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org> wrote:

> I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.
>
> Billie
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
> <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Hello, reviving this thread.
> >
> > I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
> > Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
> >
> > We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
> > 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
> > really blocking us.
> >
> > If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
> 3.3.1
> > (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
> > please shout out.
> >
> > Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.
> There
> > are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread
> for
> > hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <
> hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
> > >
> > > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
> > trunk
> > > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have
> made
> > > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we
> have
> > > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
> > > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
> > > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
> > >
> > > I think it's good time to add this feature.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Hemanth Boyina
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi David,
> > > >
> > > > >> Still hoping for help here:
> > > >
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > >
> > > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
> > > >
> > > > -Vinay
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > Still hoping for help here:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
> > forward.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
> > > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
> > > release,
> > > > as
> > > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
> > > quirks
> > > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
> > > regressions
> > > > on
> > > > > > IPv4?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the last
> > > mail,
> > > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We have
> > > done
> > > > a
> > > > > > good
> > > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable
> and
> > > used
> > > > > by
> > > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is a
> > > good
> > > > > time
> > > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM
> discovery
> > > with
> > > > > > retry
> > > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
> > > > > release. I
> > > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
> > > > stability
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > > >> can
> > > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <stbilwa@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
> > > using
> > > > > > these
> > > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
> > bigger
> > > > > > > clusters.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
> > > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> > Bilwa
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if
> anybody
> > > has
> > > > > some
> > > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
> > > > > sunilg@apache.org>
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
> > > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <
> stack@duboce.net>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
> > > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
> > > > hackathon
> > > > > > > >> where we
> > > > > > > >> >> > try
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
> > time
> > > > from
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >> >> people
> > > > > > > >> >> > > with
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
> > code
> > > > > > (Stack?)
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing,
> hackathon,
> > > > > > testing).
> > > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> >> > > S
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
> > > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
> > > > > hadoop-thirdparty
> > > > > > > too
> > > > > > > >> >> > before.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of
> it.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago, and
> as
> > > of
> > > > > now
> > > > > > > >> we've
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A
> number
> > > of
> > > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
> > > > > > > >> >> > > are
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
> > guava
> > > > > > version
> > > > > > > >> >> > conflict
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1
> before
> > > the
> > > > > > diff
> > > > > > > >> >> becomes
> > > > > > > >> >> > > even
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
> > > blockers
> > > > > > for a
> > > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
> > > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
> > 3.3.1
> > > > RM?
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe
> the
> > > ARM
> > > > > > build
> > > > > > > >> >> > process.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -Vinay
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Billie and Viraj,

As of today we are at 657 resolved jiras in 3.3.1
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HADOOP%2C%20HDFS%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved)%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)
There are so many new features (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+3.3+Release) I
counted 10, that it is barely a dot release.

Please make every effort to backport the said jiras to branch-3.3. I'd like
to cut the branch sooner than later. I'd also call for more frequent
releases. At the current development pace, a dot release every quarter
would make sense IMO.

Given the number of release blockers, I propose a tentative code freeze
date: end of next Friday. After that I'd like to cut the branch and make an
RC.

Thoughts? I can't do this all alone. If you find things that are worth
stopping the release, please tag the jira with the label 'release-blocker'.



On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org> wrote:

> I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.
>
> Billie
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
> <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Hello, reviving this thread.
> >
> > I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
> > Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
> >
> > We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
> > 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
> > really blocking us.
> >
> > If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
> 3.3.1
> > (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
> > please shout out.
> >
> > Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.
> There
> > are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread
> for
> > hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <
> hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
> > >
> > > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
> > trunk
> > > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have
> made
> > > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we
> have
> > > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
> > > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
> > > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
> > >
> > > I think it's good time to add this feature.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Hemanth Boyina
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi David,
> > > >
> > > > >> Still hoping for help here:
> > > >
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > >
> > > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
> > > >
> > > > -Vinay
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > Still hoping for help here:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
> > forward.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
> > > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
> > > release,
> > > > as
> > > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
> > > quirks
> > > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
> > > regressions
> > > > on
> > > > > > IPv4?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the last
> > > mail,
> > > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We have
> > > done
> > > > a
> > > > > > good
> > > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable
> and
> > > used
> > > > > by
> > > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is a
> > > good
> > > > > time
> > > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM
> discovery
> > > with
> > > > > > retry
> > > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
> > > > > release. I
> > > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
> > > > stability
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > > >> can
> > > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <stbilwa@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
> > > using
> > > > > > these
> > > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
> > bigger
> > > > > > > clusters.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
> > > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> > Bilwa
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if
> anybody
> > > has
> > > > > some
> > > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
> > > > > sunilg@apache.org>
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
> > > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <
> stack@duboce.net>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
> > > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
> > > > hackathon
> > > > > > > >> where we
> > > > > > > >> >> > try
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
> > time
> > > > from
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >> >> people
> > > > > > > >> >> > > with
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
> > code
> > > > > > (Stack?)
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing,
> hackathon,
> > > > > > testing).
> > > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> >> > > S
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
> > > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
> > > > > hadoop-thirdparty
> > > > > > > too
> > > > > > > >> >> > before.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of
> it.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago, and
> as
> > > of
> > > > > now
> > > > > > > >> we've
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A
> number
> > > of
> > > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
> > > > > > > >> >> > > are
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
> > guava
> > > > > > version
> > > > > > > >> >> > conflict
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1
> before
> > > the
> > > > > > diff
> > > > > > > >> >> becomes
> > > > > > > >> >> > > even
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
> > > blockers
> > > > > > for a
> > > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
> > > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
> > 3.3.1
> > > > RM?
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe
> the
> > > ARM
> > > > > > build
> > > > > > > >> >> > process.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -Vinay
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Billie and Viraj,

As of today we are at 657 resolved jiras in 3.3.1
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HADOOP%2C%20HDFS%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved)%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)
There are so many new features (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+3.3+Release) I
counted 10, that it is barely a dot release.

Please make every effort to backport the said jiras to branch-3.3. I'd like
to cut the branch sooner than later. I'd also call for more frequent
releases. At the current development pace, a dot release every quarter
would make sense IMO.

Given the number of release blockers, I propose a tentative code freeze
date: end of next Friday. After that I'd like to cut the branch and make an
RC.

Thoughts? I can't do this all alone. If you find things that are worth
stopping the release, please tag the jira with the label 'release-blocker'.



On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org> wrote:

> I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.
>
> Billie
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
> <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Hello, reviving this thread.
> >
> > I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
> > Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
> >
> > We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
> > 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
> > really blocking us.
> >
> > If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
> 3.3.1
> > (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
> > please shout out.
> >
> > Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.
> There
> > are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread
> for
> > hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <
> hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
> > >
> > > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
> > trunk
> > > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have
> made
> > > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we
> have
> > > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
> > > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
> > > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
> > >
> > > I think it's good time to add this feature.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Hemanth Boyina
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi David,
> > > >
> > > > >> Still hoping for help here:
> > > >
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > >
> > > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
> > > >
> > > > -Vinay
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > Still hoping for help here:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
> > forward.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
> > > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
> > > release,
> > > > as
> > > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
> > > quirks
> > > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
> > > regressions
> > > > on
> > > > > > IPv4?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the last
> > > mail,
> > > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We have
> > > done
> > > > a
> > > > > > good
> > > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable
> and
> > > used
> > > > > by
> > > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is a
> > > good
> > > > > time
> > > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM
> discovery
> > > with
> > > > > > retry
> > > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
> > > > > release. I
> > > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
> > > > stability
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > > >> can
> > > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <stbilwa@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
> > > using
> > > > > > these
> > > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
> > bigger
> > > > > > > clusters.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
> > > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> > Bilwa
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if
> anybody
> > > has
> > > > > some
> > > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
> > > > > sunilg@apache.org>
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
> > > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <
> stack@duboce.net>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
> > > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
> > > > hackathon
> > > > > > > >> where we
> > > > > > > >> >> > try
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
> > time
> > > > from
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >> >> people
> > > > > > > >> >> > > with
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
> > code
> > > > > > (Stack?)
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing,
> hackathon,
> > > > > > testing).
> > > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> >> > > S
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
> > > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
> > > > > hadoop-thirdparty
> > > > > > > too
> > > > > > > >> >> > before.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of
> it.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago, and
> as
> > > of
> > > > > now
> > > > > > > >> we've
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A
> number
> > > of
> > > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
> > > > > > > >> >> > > are
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
> > guava
> > > > > > version
> > > > > > > >> >> > conflict
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1
> before
> > > the
> > > > > > diff
> > > > > > > >> >> becomes
> > > > > > > >> >> > > even
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
> > > blockers
> > > > > > for a
> > > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
> > > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
> > 3.3.1
> > > > RM?
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe
> the
> > > ARM
> > > > > > build
> > > > > > > >> >> > process.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -Vinay
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Billie and Viraj,

As of today we are at 657 resolved jiras in 3.3.1
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HADOOP%2C%20HDFS%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved)%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)
There are so many new features (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+3.3+Release) I
counted 10, that it is barely a dot release.

Please make every effort to backport the said jiras to branch-3.3. I'd like
to cut the branch sooner than later. I'd also call for more frequent
releases. At the current development pace, a dot release every quarter
would make sense IMO.

Given the number of release blockers, I propose a tentative code freeze
date: end of next Friday. After that I'd like to cut the branch and make an
RC.

Thoughts? I can't do this all alone. If you find things that are worth
stopping the release, please tag the jira with the label 'release-blocker'.



On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org> wrote:

> I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.
>
> Billie
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
> <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Hello, reviving this thread.
> >
> > I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
> > Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
> >
> > We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
> > 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
> > really blocking us.
> >
> > If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
> 3.3.1
> > (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
> > please shout out.
> >
> > Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.
> There
> > are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread
> for
> > hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <
> hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
> > >
> > > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
> > trunk
> > > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have
> made
> > > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we
> have
> > > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
> > > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
> > > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
> > >
> > > I think it's good time to add this feature.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Hemanth Boyina
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi David,
> > > >
> > > > >> Still hoping for help here:
> > > >
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > >
> > > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
> > > >
> > > > -Vinay
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > Still hoping for help here:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
> > forward.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
> > > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
> > > release,
> > > > as
> > > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
> > > quirks
> > > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
> > > regressions
> > > > on
> > > > > > IPv4?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the last
> > > mail,
> > > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We have
> > > done
> > > > a
> > > > > > good
> > > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable
> and
> > > used
> > > > > by
> > > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is a
> > > good
> > > > > time
> > > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM
> discovery
> > > with
> > > > > > retry
> > > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
> > > > > release. I
> > > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
> > > > stability
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > > >> can
> > > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <stbilwa@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
> > > using
> > > > > > these
> > > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
> > bigger
> > > > > > > clusters.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
> > > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> > Bilwa
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if
> anybody
> > > has
> > > > > some
> > > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
> > > > > sunilg@apache.org>
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
> > > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <
> stack@duboce.net>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
> > > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
> > > > hackathon
> > > > > > > >> where we
> > > > > > > >> >> > try
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
> > time
> > > > from
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >> >> people
> > > > > > > >> >> > > with
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
> > code
> > > > > > (Stack?)
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing,
> hackathon,
> > > > > > testing).
> > > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> >> > > S
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
> > > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
> > > > > hadoop-thirdparty
> > > > > > > too
> > > > > > > >> >> > before.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of
> it.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago, and
> as
> > > of
> > > > > now
> > > > > > > >> we've
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A
> number
> > > of
> > > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
> > > > > > > >> >> > > are
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
> > guava
> > > > > > version
> > > > > > > >> >> > conflict
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1
> before
> > > the
> > > > > > diff
> > > > > > > >> >> becomes
> > > > > > > >> >> > > even
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
> > > blockers
> > > > > > for a
> > > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
> > > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
> > 3.3.1
> > > > RM?
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe
> the
> > > ARM
> > > > > > build
> > > > > > > >> >> > process.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -Vinay
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org>.
I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.

Billie

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
<we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hello, reviving this thread.
>
> I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
> Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>
> We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
> 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
> really blocking us.
>
> If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in 3.3.1
> (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
> please shout out.
>
> Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too. There
> are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread for
> hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
> >
> > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
> trunk
> > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have made
> > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we have
> > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
> > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
> > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
> >
> > I think it's good time to add this feature.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hemanth Boyina
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > >> Still hoping for help here:
> > >
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > >
> > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
> > >
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Still hoping for help here:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > >
> > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
> forward.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
> > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
> > release,
> > > as
> > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
> > quirks
> > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
> > regressions
> > > on
> > > > > IPv4?
> > > > >
> > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the last
> > mail,
> > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We have
> > done
> > > a
> > > > > good
> > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable and
> > used
> > > > by
> > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is a
> > good
> > > > time
> > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM discovery
> > with
> > > > > retry
> > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
> > > > release. I
> > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
> > > stability
> > > > > we
> > > > > > >> can
> > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
> > using
> > > > > these
> > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
> bigger
> > > > > > clusters.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
> > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
> > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> > Bilwa
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if anybody
> > has
> > > > some
> > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
> > > > sunilg@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
> > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
> > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
> > > hackathon
> > > > > > >> where we
> > > > > > >> >> > try
> > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
> time
> > > from
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> >> people
> > > > > > >> >> > > with
> > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
> code
> > > > > (Stack?)
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing, hackathon,
> > > > > testing).
> > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> >> > > S
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
> > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
> > > > hadoop-thirdparty
> > > > > > too
> > > > > > >> >> > before.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of it.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago, and as
> > of
> > > > now
> > > > > > >> we've
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A number
> > of
> > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
> > > > > > >> >> > > are
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
> guava
> > > > > version
> > > > > > >> >> > conflict
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1 before
> > the
> > > > > diff
> > > > > > >> >> becomes
> > > > > > >> >> > > even
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
> > blockers
> > > > > for a
> > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
> > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
> > > > > > >> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
> 3.3.1
> > > RM?
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe the
> > ARM
> > > > > build
> > > > > > >> >> > process.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Viraj Jasani <vj...@apache.org>.
Thanks Wei-Chiu.

> If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
3.3.1
(I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
please shout out.

Although not marked critical, I believe HDFS-15982 could get in 3.3.1 if
you are fine. Thanks to Bhavik for filing this.

> Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.

I agree we should work on this to upgrade some dependencies from known CVEs
(e.g guava). However, does this mean Hadoop 3.3.1 has dependency
on hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0? (as we would like to upgrade guava and other
shaded thirdparty dependencies for 3.3.1 as well)


On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:04 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
<we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hello, reviving this thread.
>
> I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
> Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>
> We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
> 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
> really blocking us.
>
> If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in 3.3.1
> (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
> please shout out.
>
> Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too. There
> are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread for
> hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
> >
> > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
> trunk
> > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have made
> > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we have
> > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
> > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
> > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
> >
> > I think it's good time to add this feature.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hemanth Boyina
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > >> Still hoping for help here:
> > >
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > >
> > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
> > >
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Still hoping for help here:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > >
> > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
> forward.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
> > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
> > release,
> > > as
> > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
> > quirks
> > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
> > regressions
> > > on
> > > > > IPv4?
> > > > >
> > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the last
> > mail,
> > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We have
> > done
> > > a
> > > > > good
> > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable and
> > used
> > > > by
> > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is a
> > good
> > > > time
> > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM discovery
> > with
> > > > > retry
> > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
> > > > release. I
> > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
> > > stability
> > > > > we
> > > > > > >> can
> > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
> > using
> > > > > these
> > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
> bigger
> > > > > > clusters.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
> > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
> > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> > Bilwa
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if anybody
> > has
> > > > some
> > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
> > > > sunilg@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
> > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
> > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
> > > hackathon
> > > > > > >> where we
> > > > > > >> >> > try
> > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
> time
> > > from
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> >> people
> > > > > > >> >> > > with
> > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
> code
> > > > > (Stack?)
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing, hackathon,
> > > > > testing).
> > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> >> > > S
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
> > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
> > > > hadoop-thirdparty
> > > > > > too
> > > > > > >> >> > before.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of it.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago, and as
> > of
> > > > now
> > > > > > >> we've
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A number
> > of
> > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
> > > > > > >> >> > > are
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
> guava
> > > > > version
> > > > > > >> >> > conflict
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1 before
> > the
> > > > > diff
> > > > > > >> >> becomes
> > > > > > >> >> > > even
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
> > blockers
> > > > > for a
> > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
> > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
> > > > > > >> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
> 3.3.1
> > > RM?
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe the
> > ARM
> > > > > build
> > > > > > >> >> > process.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Viraj Jasani <vj...@apache.org>.
Thanks Wei-Chiu.

> If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
3.3.1
(I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
please shout out.

Although not marked critical, I believe HDFS-15982 could get in 3.3.1 if
you are fine. Thanks to Bhavik for filing this.

> Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.

I agree we should work on this to upgrade some dependencies from known CVEs
(e.g guava). However, does this mean Hadoop 3.3.1 has dependency
on hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0? (as we would like to upgrade guava and other
shaded thirdparty dependencies for 3.3.1 as well)


On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:04 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
<we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hello, reviving this thread.
>
> I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
> Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>
> We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
> 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
> really blocking us.
>
> If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in 3.3.1
> (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
> please shout out.
>
> Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too. There
> are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread for
> hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
> >
> > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
> trunk
> > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have made
> > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we have
> > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
> > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
> > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
> >
> > I think it's good time to add this feature.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hemanth Boyina
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > >> Still hoping for help here:
> > >
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > >
> > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
> > >
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Still hoping for help here:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > >
> > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
> forward.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
> > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
> > release,
> > > as
> > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
> > quirks
> > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
> > regressions
> > > on
> > > > > IPv4?
> > > > >
> > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the last
> > mail,
> > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We have
> > done
> > > a
> > > > > good
> > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable and
> > used
> > > > by
> > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is a
> > good
> > > > time
> > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM discovery
> > with
> > > > > retry
> > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
> > > > release. I
> > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
> > > stability
> > > > > we
> > > > > > >> can
> > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
> > using
> > > > > these
> > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
> bigger
> > > > > > clusters.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
> > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
> > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> > Bilwa
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if anybody
> > has
> > > > some
> > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
> > > > sunilg@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
> > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
> > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
> > > hackathon
> > > > > > >> where we
> > > > > > >> >> > try
> > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
> time
> > > from
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> >> people
> > > > > > >> >> > > with
> > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
> code
> > > > > (Stack?)
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing, hackathon,
> > > > > testing).
> > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> >> > > S
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
> > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
> > > > hadoop-thirdparty
> > > > > > too
> > > > > > >> >> > before.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of it.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago, and as
> > of
> > > > now
> > > > > > >> we've
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A number
> > of
> > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
> > > > > > >> >> > > are
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
> guava
> > > > > version
> > > > > > >> >> > conflict
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1 before
> > the
> > > > > diff
> > > > > > >> >> becomes
> > > > > > >> >> > > even
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
> > blockers
> > > > > for a
> > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
> > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
> > > > > > >> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
> 3.3.1
> > > RM?
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe the
> > ARM
> > > > > build
> > > > > > >> >> > process.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org>.
I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.

Billie

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
<we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hello, reviving this thread.
>
> I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
> Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>
> We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
> 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
> really blocking us.
>
> If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in 3.3.1
> (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
> please shout out.
>
> Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too. There
> are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread for
> hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
> >
> > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
> trunk
> > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have made
> > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we have
> > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
> > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
> > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
> >
> > I think it's good time to add this feature.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hemanth Boyina
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > >> Still hoping for help here:
> > >
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > >
> > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
> > >
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Still hoping for help here:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > >
> > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
> forward.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
> > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
> > release,
> > > as
> > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
> > quirks
> > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
> > regressions
> > > on
> > > > > IPv4?
> > > > >
> > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the last
> > mail,
> > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We have
> > done
> > > a
> > > > > good
> > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable and
> > used
> > > > by
> > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is a
> > good
> > > > time
> > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM discovery
> > with
> > > > > retry
> > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
> > > > release. I
> > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
> > > stability
> > > > > we
> > > > > > >> can
> > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
> > using
> > > > > these
> > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
> bigger
> > > > > > clusters.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
> > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
> > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> > Bilwa
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if anybody
> > has
> > > > some
> > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
> > > > sunilg@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
> > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
> > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
> > > hackathon
> > > > > > >> where we
> > > > > > >> >> > try
> > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
> time
> > > from
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> >> people
> > > > > > >> >> > > with
> > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
> code
> > > > > (Stack?)
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing, hackathon,
> > > > > testing).
> > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> >> > > S
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
> > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
> > > > hadoop-thirdparty
> > > > > > too
> > > > > > >> >> > before.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of it.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago, and as
> > of
> > > > now
> > > > > > >> we've
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A number
> > of
> > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
> > > > > > >> >> > > are
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
> guava
> > > > > version
> > > > > > >> >> > conflict
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1 before
> > the
> > > > > diff
> > > > > > >> >> becomes
> > > > > > >> >> > > even
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
> > blockers
> > > > > for a
> > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
> > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
> > > > > > >> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
> 3.3.1
> > > RM?
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe the
> > ARM
> > > > > build
> > > > > > >> >> > process.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org>.
I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.

Billie

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
<we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hello, reviving this thread.
>
> I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
> Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>
> We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
> 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
> really blocking us.
>
> If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in 3.3.1
> (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
> please shout out.
>
> Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too. There
> are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread for
> hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
> >
> > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
> trunk
> > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have made
> > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we have
> > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
> > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
> > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
> >
> > I think it's good time to add this feature.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hemanth Boyina
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > >> Still hoping for help here:
> > >
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > >
> > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
> > >
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Still hoping for help here:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > >
> > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
> forward.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
> > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
> > release,
> > > as
> > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
> > quirks
> > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
> > regressions
> > > on
> > > > > IPv4?
> > > > >
> > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the last
> > mail,
> > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We have
> > done
> > > a
> > > > > good
> > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable and
> > used
> > > > by
> > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is a
> > good
> > > > time
> > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM discovery
> > with
> > > > > retry
> > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
> > > > release. I
> > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
> > > stability
> > > > > we
> > > > > > >> can
> > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
> > using
> > > > > these
> > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
> bigger
> > > > > > clusters.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
> > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
> > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> > Bilwa
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if anybody
> > has
> > > > some
> > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
> > > > sunilg@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
> > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
> > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
> > > hackathon
> > > > > > >> where we
> > > > > > >> >> > try
> > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
> time
> > > from
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> >> people
> > > > > > >> >> > > with
> > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
> code
> > > > > (Stack?)
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing, hackathon,
> > > > > testing).
> > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> >> > > S
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
> > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
> > > > hadoop-thirdparty
> > > > > > too
> > > > > > >> >> > before.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of it.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago, and as
> > of
> > > > now
> > > > > > >> we've
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A number
> > of
> > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
> > > > > > >> >> > > are
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
> guava
> > > > > version
> > > > > > >> >> > conflict
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1 before
> > the
> > > > > diff
> > > > > > >> >> becomes
> > > > > > >> >> > > even
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
> > blockers
> > > > > for a
> > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
> > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
> > > > > > >> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
> 3.3.1
> > > RM?
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe the
> > ARM
> > > > > build
> > > > > > >> >> > process.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Viraj Jasani <vj...@apache.org>.
Thanks Wei-Chiu.

> If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
3.3.1
(I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
please shout out.

Although not marked critical, I believe HDFS-15982 could get in 3.3.1 if
you are fine. Thanks to Bhavik for filing this.

> Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.

I agree we should work on this to upgrade some dependencies from known CVEs
(e.g guava). However, does this mean Hadoop 3.3.1 has dependency
on hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0? (as we would like to upgrade guava and other
shaded thirdparty dependencies for 3.3.1 as well)


On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:04 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
<we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hello, reviving this thread.
>
> I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
> Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>
> We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
> 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
> really blocking us.
>
> If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in 3.3.1
> (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
> please shout out.
>
> Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too. There
> are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread for
> hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
> >
> > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
> trunk
> > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have made
> > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we have
> > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
> > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
> > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
> >
> > I think it's good time to add this feature.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hemanth Boyina
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > >> Still hoping for help here:
> > >
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > >
> > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
> > >
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Still hoping for help here:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > >
> > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
> forward.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
> > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
> > release,
> > > as
> > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
> > quirks
> > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
> > regressions
> > > on
> > > > > IPv4?
> > > > >
> > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the last
> > mail,
> > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We have
> > done
> > > a
> > > > > good
> > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable and
> > used
> > > > by
> > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is a
> > good
> > > > time
> > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM discovery
> > with
> > > > > retry
> > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
> > > > release. I
> > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
> > > stability
> > > > > we
> > > > > > >> can
> > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
> > using
> > > > > these
> > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
> bigger
> > > > > > clusters.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
> > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
> > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> > Bilwa
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if anybody
> > has
> > > > some
> > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
> > > > sunilg@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
> > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
> > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
> > > hackathon
> > > > > > >> where we
> > > > > > >> >> > try
> > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
> time
> > > from
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> >> people
> > > > > > >> >> > > with
> > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
> code
> > > > > (Stack?)
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing, hackathon,
> > > > > testing).
> > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> >> > > S
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
> > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
> > > > hadoop-thirdparty
> > > > > > too
> > > > > > >> >> > before.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of it.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago, and as
> > of
> > > > now
> > > > > > >> we've
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A number
> > of
> > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
> > > > > > >> >> > > are
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
> guava
> > > > > version
> > > > > > >> >> > conflict
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1 before
> > the
> > > > > diff
> > > > > > >> >> becomes
> > > > > > >> >> > > even
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
> > blockers
> > > > > for a
> > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
> > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
> > > > > > >> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
> 3.3.1
> > > RM?
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe the
> > ARM
> > > > > build
> > > > > > >> >> > process.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Billie Rinaldi <bi...@apache.org>.
I was thinking of backporting HADOOP-16948 for 3.3.1.

Billie

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
<we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hello, reviving this thread.
>
> I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
> Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>
> We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
> 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
> really blocking us.
>
> If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in 3.3.1
> (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
> please shout out.
>
> Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too. There
> are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread for
> hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
> >
> > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
> trunk
> > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have made
> > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we have
> > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
> > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
> > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
> >
> > I think it's good time to add this feature.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hemanth Boyina
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > >> Still hoping for help here:
> > >
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > >
> > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
> > >
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Still hoping for help here:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > >
> > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
> forward.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
> > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
> > release,
> > > as
> > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
> > quirks
> > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
> > regressions
> > > on
> > > > > IPv4?
> > > > >
> > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the last
> > mail,
> > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We have
> > done
> > > a
> > > > > good
> > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable and
> > used
> > > > by
> > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is a
> > good
> > > > time
> > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM discovery
> > with
> > > > > retry
> > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
> > > > release. I
> > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
> > > stability
> > > > > we
> > > > > > >> can
> > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
> > using
> > > > > these
> > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
> bigger
> > > > > > clusters.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
> > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
> > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> > Bilwa
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if anybody
> > has
> > > > some
> > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
> > > > sunilg@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
> > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
> > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
> > > hackathon
> > > > > > >> where we
> > > > > > >> >> > try
> > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
> time
> > > from
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> >> people
> > > > > > >> >> > > with
> > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
> code
> > > > > (Stack?)
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing, hackathon,
> > > > > testing).
> > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> >> > > S
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
> > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
> > > > hadoop-thirdparty
> > > > > > too
> > > > > > >> >> > before.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of it.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago, and as
> > of
> > > > now
> > > > > > >> we've
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A number
> > of
> > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
> > > > > > >> >> > > are
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
> guava
> > > > > version
> > > > > > >> >> > conflict
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1 before
> > the
> > > > > diff
> > > > > > >> >> becomes
> > > > > > >> >> > > even
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
> > blockers
> > > > > for a
> > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
> > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
> > > > > > >> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
> 3.3.1
> > > RM?
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe the
> > ARM
> > > > > build
> > > > > > >> >> > process.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.1 release

Posted by Viraj Jasani <vj...@apache.org>.
Thanks Wei-Chiu.

> If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in
3.3.1
(I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
please shout out.

Although not marked critical, I believe HDFS-15982 could get in 3.3.1 if
you are fine. Thanks to Bhavik for filing this.

> Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too.

I agree we should work on this to upgrade some dependencies from known CVEs
(e.g guava). However, does this mean Hadoop 3.3.1 has dependency
on hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0? (as we would like to upgrade guava and other
shaded thirdparty dependencies for 3.3.1 as well)


On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:04 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang
<we...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hello, reviving this thread.
>
> I created a dashboard for Hadoop 3.3.1 release.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12336122
> Also a jira to track the release work: HADOOP-17647
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17647>
>
> We are currently at 5 release blockers and 3 critical issues for Hadoop
> 3.3.1. I'll go through each of them and push out the ones that aren't
> really blocking us.
>
> If you believe there are more features/bug fixes we should include in 3.3.1
> (I spent the past few weeks backporting jiras but I'm sure I missed some)
> please shout out.
>
> Meanwhile, I believe we need to release hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 too. There
> are a number of tasks to be done there too. Let's start another thread for
> hadoop-thirdparty 1.1.0 release.
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:04 PM hemanth boyina <hemanthboyina224@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve and Wei-Chiu
> >
> > Regarding the IPV6,Few years back we have rebased the HADOOP-11890 to
> trunk
> > and tried to work out with IPV6, we have faced some issues and have made
> > the required changes for ipv6 to work.After the changes were made we have
> > tested the IPV6 changes on top of Ipv4 and Ipv6 machines and tested
> > rigorously.Its been quite a some time these changes were deployed in
> > production cluster and have been in use for extensive purpose.
> >
> > I think it's good time to add this feature.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hemanth Boyina
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, 10:22 Vinayakumar B, <vi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > >> Still hoping for help here:
> > >
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > >
> > > I will raise a PR for the said solution soon (in a day or two).
> > >
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 5:39 AM, David <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Still hoping for help here:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790
> > > >
> > > > Looks like it has been worked on, not sure how to best move it
> forward.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:21 PM Steve Loughran
> > > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm going to argue its too late to do IPv6 support close to a
> > release,
> > > as
> > > > > it's best if its on developer machines for some time to let all
> > quirks
> > > > > surface. It's not so much IPv6 itself, but do we cause any
> > regressions
> > > on
> > > > > IPv4?
> > > > >
> > > > > But: it can/should go into trunk and stabilize there
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:52, Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have missed out mentioning about the IPV6 feature in the last
> > mail,
> > > > > > Support for IPV6 has been in development since 2015 and We have
> > done
> > > a
> > > > > good
> > > > > > amount of testing at our organisation, the feature is stable and
> > used
> > > > by
> > > > > > our customers extensively in the last one year. I think it is a
> > good
> > > > time
> > > > > > to add the IPV6 support to 3.3.1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11890
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:13 AM Muralikrishna Dmmkr <
> > > > > > muralikrishna.dmmkr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can we have this new feature "YARN Registry based AM discovery
> > with
> > > > > retry
> > > > > > > and in-flight task persistent via JHS" in the upcoming 3.1.1
> > > > release. I
> > > > > > > have also attached a test-report in the below jira.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6726
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > D M Murali Krishna Reddy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:11 AM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Bilwa,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I have commented on the jira's you mentioned. Based on the
> > > stability
> > > > > we
> > > > > > >> can
> > > > > > >> plan this.But needs to be merged ASAP.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:20 PM bilwa st <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Hi Brahma,
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Can we have below features in 3.3.1 release? We have been
> > using
> > > > > these
> > > > > > >> > features for a long time. They are stable and tested in
> bigger
> > > > > > clusters.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > 1. Container reuse -
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6749
> > > > > > >> > 2. Speculative attempts should not run on the same node -
> > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7169
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> > Bilwa
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 1:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula <
> > > > > brahma@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Sorry for the late reply..
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> I will come up with a plan.. Please let me know if anybody
> > has
> > > > some
> > > > > > >> >> features/improvements/bugs that need to be included.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Sunil Govindan <
> > > > sunilg@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> > Hi Wei-Chiu,
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > Thanks
> > > > > > >> >> > Sunil
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran
> > > > > > >> >> > <stevel@cloudera.com.invalid
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > Regarding blockers &c: how about we have a little
> > > hackathon
> > > > > > >> where we
> > > > > > >> >> > try
> > > > > > >> >> > > > and get things in. This means a promise of review
> time
> > > from
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> >> people
> > > > > > >> >> > > with
> > > > > > >> >> > > > commit rights and other people who understand the
> code
> > > > > (Stack?)
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > I'm up for helping get 3.3.1 out (reviewing, hackathon,
> > > > > testing).
> > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> >> > > S
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > -steve
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 06:48, Ayush Saxena <
> > > > > ayushtkn@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to mention we would need to release
> > > > hadoop-thirdparty
> > > > > > too
> > > > > > >> >> > before.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Presently we are using the snapshot version of it.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > -Ayush
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 28-Jan-2021, at 6:59 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > > > >> weichiu@apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hadoop 3.3.0 was released half a year ago, and as
> > of
> > > > now
> > > > > > >> we've
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > accumulated
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > more than 400 changes in the branch-3.3. A number
> > of
> > > > > > >> >> downstreamers
> > > > > > >> >> > > are
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > eagerly waiting for 3.3.1 which addresses the
> guava
> > > > > version
> > > > > > >> >> > conflict
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > issue.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20and%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.3.1)%20and%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > We should start the release work for 3.3.1 before
> > the
> > > > > diff
> > > > > > >> >> becomes
> > > > > > >> >> > > even
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > larger.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I believe there are  currently only two real
> > blockers
> > > > > for a
> > > > > > >> >> 3.3.1
> > > > > > >> >> > > > (using
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > this filter
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=project%20in%20(HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%20cf%5B12310320%5D%20in%20(3.3.1)%20AND%20status%20not%20in%20(Resolved)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > )
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   1. HDFS-15566 <
> > > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15566>
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >   2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >      1. HADOOP-17112 <
> > > > > > >> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17112
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >         2.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Is there anyone who would volunteer to be the
> 3.3.1
> > > RM?
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Also, the HowToRelease wiki does not describe the
> > ARM
> > > > > build
> > > > > > >> >> > process.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > That's
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > going to be important for future releases.
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > >> hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> >
>