Re: JDBC driver for Derby network server mode?

[Kathy Saunders <ka...@Source-Zone.com>]

Kathy Saunders wrote:

>
>>>
>>> It would seem to be in the best interests of Apache.org, IBM and 
>>> potential users.
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree.  It's up to the ASF and users to lobby IBM to do the Right 
>> Thing (tm)(sm)(R)
>>
>> geir
>>
> I am looking into what can be done on the IBM side, but I don't 
> guarantee an immediate resolution.  I'll keep everyone informed on any 
> progress :-)
>
> Kathy
>
>
Hi,

IBM would like to contribute a client JDBC driver to the Apache Derby 
project.  If all goes according to plan, we hope to have the 
contribution available for Apache Derby around March 2005.

Kathy

Re: JDBC driver for Derby network server mode?

[Kathey Marsden <km...@Sourcery.Org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Kathy Saunders wrote:

> Hi,
>
> IBM would like to contribute a client JDBC driver to the Apache Derby
> project.  If all goes according to plan, we hope to have the
> contribution available for Apache Derby around March 2005.
>

In preparation for this I was wondering if anyone has any objection to
my adding a new
framework DerbyNetClient to RunTest ahead of time?  It will help
facilitate testing with the new driver and would not affect the existing
frameworks.


Thanks

Kathey



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFB5v4aG0h36bFmkocRAo5pAJ9a0WtD7hkY8Ot772uCMi0LZMC4rwCgmsGb
rJJzpdjkV8NpZ0bH6Et3yqU=
=kxu2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----