You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "godfrey he (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/12/01 08:00:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-20435) Refactor ExecNode

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

godfrey he updated FLINK-20435:
-------------------------------
    Component/s: Table SQL / API

> Refactor ExecNode
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-20435
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20435
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Table SQL / API
>            Reporter: godfrey he
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently, there are many improvements about ExecNode:
> 1. simplify type parameter of {{ExecNode}}. Currently, {{ExecNode#translateToPlan}} takes {{BatchPlanner}} or {{StreamPlanner}} as a parameter, so {{ExecNode}} has a type parameter {{E <: Planner}}, which indicates the node is a batch node or a streaming node. While in the future, a plan may contain both batch nodes and stream node. The type parameter can be removed, the implementation base class can cast the planner to expected planner.
> 2. port ExecNode to Java
> 3. separate the implementation of {{RelNode}} and {{ExecNode}}. Currently, an execution node extends both from {{RelNode}} and {{ExecNode}}. After a physical node is converted to an exec node, many parameters are unnecessary, such as: RelOptCluster, RelTraitSet, etc. With more optimizations on {{ExecNode}}, We need {{ExecNode}} to be cleaner and simpler. So we will separate the implementation of {{RelNode}} and {{ExecNode}}.
> This is an umbrella issue, we will create more related sub-tasks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)