You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@myfaces.apache.org by Jonathan Eric Miller <je...@uchicago.edu> on 2005/03/10 16:18:19 UTC
Fw: DataModels not Serializable?
I asked the JSF developers at Sun the question about why DataModels are not
Serializable and this is the response I got. Not sure exactly what it
means... I'm guessing it means that JSF internal components, don't support
Serialization, so, even if the DataModels were Serializable, it still
wouldn't work?
Jon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Burns" <Ed...@Sun.COM>
To: "Jonathan Eric Miller" <je...@uchicago.edu>
Cc: <JS...@Sun.COM>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 12:42 PM
Subject: DataModels not Serializable?
>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:21:11 -0600, Jonathan Eric Miller
>>>>>> <je...@uchicago.edu> said:
>
> JM> Hi. I'm wondering if there is a reason why the DataModels such as
> JM> ListDataModel are not Serializable?
>
> Because the state management mechanism does not use Serialization.
>
> Ed
>
> --
> | ed.burns@sun.com | {home: 407 294 2468, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
> | aim: edburns0sunw | iim: ed.burns@sun.com
>
Re: Fw: DataModels not Serializable?
Posted by Jonathan Eric Miller <je...@uchicago.edu>.
The problem is that normally as far as I know you put your DataModel into
your backing bean and you can't make your backing bean Serializable because
DataModel isn't Serializable.
One thing I'm wondering about is; I guess there are two sets of state; JSF
state which you can mark as server or client side, and normal HttpSession
state that is on the server side and is handled by the servlet container?
Jon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Heinz Drews" <he...@gmail.com>
To: "MyFaces Discussion" <my...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: DataModels not Serializable?
> Jon,
>
> my interpretation of the statement would be that the model don't need
> to be marked serializable because they are not handled thru the
> default serialization mechanism
>
> Heinz
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:18:19 -0600, Jonathan Eric Miller
> <je...@uchicago.edu> wrote:
>> I asked the JSF developers at Sun the question about why DataModels are
>> not
>> Serializable and this is the response I got. Not sure exactly what it
>> means... I'm guessing it means that JSF internal components, don't
>> support
>> Serialization, so, even if the DataModels were Serializable, it still
>> wouldn't work?
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ed Burns" <Ed...@Sun.COM>
>> To: "Jonathan Eric Miller" <je...@uchicago.edu>
>> Cc: <JS...@Sun.COM>
>> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 12:42 PM
>> Subject: DataModels not Serializable?
>>
>> >>>>>> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:21:11 -0600, Jonathan Eric Miller
>> >>>>>> <je...@uchicago.edu> said:
>> >
>> > JM> Hi. I'm wondering if there is a reason why the DataModels such as
>> > JM> ListDataModel are not Serializable?
>> >
>> > Because the state management mechanism does not use Serialization.
>> >
>> > Ed
>> >
>> > --
>> > | ed.burns@sun.com | {home: 407 294 2468, office: 408 884 9519 OR
>> > x31640}
>> > | aim: edburns0sunw | iim: ed.burns@sun.com
>> >
>>
>>
>
Re: Fw: DataModels not Serializable?
Posted by Heinz Drews <he...@gmail.com>.
Jon,
my interpretation of the statement would be that the model don't need
to be marked serializable because they are not handled thru the
default serialization mechanism
Heinz
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:18:19 -0600, Jonathan Eric Miller
<je...@uchicago.edu> wrote:
> I asked the JSF developers at Sun the question about why DataModels are not
> Serializable and this is the response I got. Not sure exactly what it
> means... I'm guessing it means that JSF internal components, don't support
> Serialization, so, even if the DataModels were Serializable, it still
> wouldn't work?
>
> Jon
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ed Burns" <Ed...@Sun.COM>
> To: "Jonathan Eric Miller" <je...@uchicago.edu>
> Cc: <JS...@Sun.COM>
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 12:42 PM
> Subject: DataModels not Serializable?
>
> >>>>>> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:21:11 -0600, Jonathan Eric Miller
> >>>>>> <je...@uchicago.edu> said:
> >
> > JM> Hi. I'm wondering if there is a reason why the DataModels such as
> > JM> ListDataModel are not Serializable?
> >
> > Because the state management mechanism does not use Serialization.
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > --
> > | ed.burns@sun.com | {home: 407 294 2468, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
> > | aim: edburns0sunw | iim: ed.burns@sun.com
> >
>
>