You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Marcel Reutegger (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/05/22 07:24:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-8967) OR query with ORDER BY don't work as
expected
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Marcel Reutegger updated OAK-8967:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.28.0)
1.30.0
> OR query with ORDER BY don't work as expected
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-8967
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8967
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: search
> Reporter: Mohit Kataria
> Assignee: Mohit Kataria
> Priority: Major
> Labels: candidate_oak_1_8
> Fix For: 1.22.3, 1.30.0
>
>
> A query with Or and having order by along with limit Don't reproduce results as per order mentioned.
> e.g.
> Let content be:
> "/UnionQueryTest1/node0",
> "/UnionQueryTest/node0",
> "/UnionQueryTest1/node0/node1",
> "/UnionQueryTest/node0/node1",
> "/UnionQueryTest1/node0/node1/node2",
> "/UnionQueryTest/node0/node1/node2",
> "/UnionQueryTest1/node0/node1/node2/node3",
> "/UnionQueryTest/node0/node1/node2/node3"
> each node having x = number in node name.
> SELECT idn1.* FROM [nt:base] as idn1 WHERE ISDESCENDANTNODE([/UnionQueryTest]) OR ISDESCENDANTNODE([/UnionQueryTest1]) ORDER BY idn1.[x] ASC
>
> result should be same as above mentioned where as current result come out to be
> /UnionQueryTest1/node0
> /UnionQueryTest1/node0/node1
> /UnionQueryTest1/node0/node1/node2
> /UnionQueryTest1/node0/node1/node2/node3
> /UnionQueryTest1/node0/node1/node2/node3/node4
> /UnionQueryTest/node0
> /UnionQueryTest/node0/node1
> /UnionQueryTest/node0/node1/node2
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)