You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/02/13 10:20:20 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2155] - Ant DTD and optionally a schema would help with Documentation vagueness

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2155>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2155

Ant DTD and optionally a schema would help with Documentation vagueness

conor@cortexebusiness.com.au changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX



------- Additional Comments From conor@cortexebusiness.com.au  2003-02-13 09:20 -------
Thanks for the suggestion. I think that with the growing number of tasks for
Ant, a single DTD is not feasible now. For editing purposes the custom DTD built
by antstructure is the way to go, IMHO. If you have problems with that DTD,
pleae let us know.

A schema version of antstructure might be a worthy enhancement.