You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Dominique Quatravaux <do...@quatravaux.org> on 2007/11/12 14:22:15 UTC

Please just apply my one-liner fix to bug #42035 and be done with it, no?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Joe Orton just closed #42035 with status fixed while posting this
enigmatic comment at
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42035#c4:

> Backport status needs to be tracked in the appropriate STATUS file,
> not in bugzilla.

What the blue badger is this supposed to mean? That Bugzilla is not to
be used to report bugs in the 2.0 branch ?! As the record shows, the
bug was closed only because someone failed to check what the contents
of the "Version" drop-down box was. So yes, sorry for reopening it.

Sorry also if I'm losing my cool a bit, but the fact is that this bug
report comes with a diagnosis, a test suite and a patch (and a
one-liner to boot), yet it has been lingering around for 7 months now
and counting.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c?view=markup
shows that my patch still wasn't applied, despite the soi-disant FIXED
status.

As the subject line says. Thank you so much in advance.

- --
<< Tout n'y est pas parfait, mais on y honore certainement les
jardiniers >>

Dominique Quatravaux <do...@quatravaux.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBRzhTh/TYH7KfeIIFAQLnTAQA0+n0wKVIpF71HDgFim5QC78CXnVNrxFF
dPcKcHCeXUZLUhs0Q2cifPWtDpiLC6emH6hljR+S+f1q2dm55Mu7PFyyFNwi4mga
EEl9CJhB3u/hcyDCM8+kK9M5vDaL5dBBkZjvmKQqB9v9UUqDP4kscTLiFmpLNnfI
BlJ+vhlmVaQ=
=odhX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Please just apply my one-liner fix to bug #42035 and be done with it, no?

Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.

On Nov 12, 2007 6:47 PM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:

>                     I'll see that your fix is proposed for backport
> to 2.0.x, and developers will have a chance to approve it.

 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=594358&view=rev

Re: Please just apply my one-liner fix to bug #42035 and be done with it, no?

Posted by Dominique Quatravaux <do...@quatravaux.org>.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeff Trawick wrote:
> I'll see that your fix is proposed for backport to 2.0.x, and
> developers will have a chance to approve it.

Thank you *so* much.

> Don't waste so much of your patience or others' over a one line
> patch which you can apply to new source distributions in almost no
> time at all.
Actually I'm the author of a PKI
(http://search.cpan.org/search?query=Crypt::OpenSSL::CA) and I need
the rest of the Internet to apply the patch in order for *my*
certificates to work everywhere :-)

Thank you for taking the time to explain the works to me.

- --
<< Tout n'y est pas parfait, mais on y honore certainement les
jardiniers >>

            Dominique Quatravaux <do...@quatravaux.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBRzmgevTYH7KfeIIFAQJTKAP9FX+7T98Sb1SZ1Ksr9Z0rDMVqhTAe+j30
NS4gmKAgXxItGnv9Zmpmh6ovmaMWDRoOet6GhN+bo85e/yJpWGQf2yclhkDGrGJN
R7Hwk7Ku1EuN0HhPr7eEqlXFOMjMw42ucEBpCNm/4kUPBUBYyBaMGoMzLeAv1thu
KO+Jxwul4+4=
=IUbi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Please just apply my one-liner fix to bug #42035 and be done with it, no?

Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.

On Nov 12, 2007 8:22 AM, Dominique Quatravaux <do...@quatravaux.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Joe Orton just closed #42035 with status fixed while posting this
> enigmatic comment at
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42035#c4:
>
> > Backport status needs to be tracked in the appropriate STATUS file,
> >  not in bugzilla.
>
> What the blue badger is this supposed to mean? That Bugzilla is not to
> be used to report bugs in the 2.0 branch ?!

You can use Bugzilla to report bugs in any version and we can consider
it resolved in Bugzilla when we fix them in any version.  There is a
separate, developer-driven procedure for backporting changes to stable
branches.  You took the hint to post to dev@ (though perhaps not
exactly as intended); I'll see that your fix is proposed for backport
to 2.0.x, and developers will have a chance to approve it.

Peace!  Don't waste so much of your patience or others' over a one
line patch which you can apply to new source distributions in almost
no time at all.