Attention list admin: Re: mail.dailyhills.com

[Matt Kettler <mk...@evi-inc.com>]

Will someone track down who this is and boot them off the list? This system 
has been sending messages like this back to the list for quite some time 
and has sent 12 messages like this to the list since 1/19/2005.

The offending posts also use From: the original message sender, and use the 
original message's message ID, so you'll have to track them down by content.

I've attempted contacting the postmaster address below and got no response. 
Clearly the system admin doesn't understand that they shouldn't be acting 
as a relay (ie: delivering the spam notice to all the To: header 
recipients, instead of the envelope recipients) and isn't listening to 
their postmaster mailbox, despite claims to the contrary.


At 11:48 AM 3/8/2005, Daniel A. de Araujo wrote:
>SpamAssassin, running on "mail.dailyhills.com", has identified this incoming
>email as possible spam.  The original message has been attached to this
>email so you can view it (if it isn't spam).
>If you have any questions, contact postmaster@dailyhills.com for details.

Re: Attention list admin: Re: mail.dailyhills.com

[Matt Kettler <mk...@evi-inc.com>]

Sorry for the follow-up reply, but upon inspection of my list archive, it 
appears the offending subscriber is:

<da...@dailyhills.com>


At 12:31 PM 3/8/2005, Matt Kettler wrote:
>Will someone track down who this is and boot them off the list? This 
>system has been sending messages like this back to the list for quite some 
>time and has sent 12 messages like this to the list since 1/19/2005.
>
>The offending posts also use From: the original message sender, and use 
>the original message's message ID, so you'll have to track them down by 
>content.
>
>I've attempted contacting the postmaster address below and got no 
>response. Clearly the system admin doesn't understand that they shouldn't 
>be acting as a relay (ie: delivering the spam notice to all the To: header 
>recipients, instead of the envelope recipients) and isn't listening to 
>their postmaster mailbox, despite claims to the contrary.
>
>
>At 11:48 AM 3/8/2005, Daniel A. de Araujo wrote:
> >SpamAssassin, running on "mail.dailyhills.com", has identified this incoming
> >email as possible spam.  The original message has been attached to this
> >email so you can view it (if it isn't spam).
> >If you have any questions, contact postmaster@dailyhills.com for details.