You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@turbine.apache.org by Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at> on 2005/03/01 17:27:47 UTC
[Fulcrum] Broken Build - Adding project files?
Hi folks,
I committed a huge chunk of code and it seems that at least
fulcrum-intakeand fulcrum-pool is broken - I'm not sure that I can sort
out the problems immediatly. Having said that I have a question - what
is the preferred way of storing project files?!
All of the Fulcrum projects come with a Maven build but now I have to
dig through fulcrum-intake. Would is be useful to add ready-to-use
project files into CVS?! The trouble is what IDE to use ... I personally
use Eclipse but it is possible to get a free licence for IDEA for comitters.
Any opinions?!
Thanks in advance
Siegfried Goeschl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Fulcrum] Broken Build - Adding project files?
Posted by Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>.
Hi Eric,
you are right, "maven eclipse" works like a charm .... ;-)
I also got the build to work - a few projects define their service
components in an arbitray order and look up the required services in the
service() method.That is not a problem for Fortress (and probably ECM)
since they use metadata and a DAG (directed acyclic graph) to determine
the correct initalization order (similar to maven:reactor) but this is a
feature not available inYAAFI. Therefore the requested service component
is not know to the container at this point of time the container
initialization fails.
In the previous version of YAAFI the service components were all
instantiated during parsing of the configuration - bug or feature I
don't know. But the ordering of role entries is crucial in this case - I
review my changes ... :-(
Another question - fulcrum-security-api builds now as 1.0.8-dev but all
the dependent projects use 1.0.7?! Is this intentional?!
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Eric Pugh wrote:
>I really lean away from that.. Maybe not a -1, but..
>
>My feeling is that they just end up cluttering things, and never seem to
>stay up to date. Especially since often people want to customize them
>to their own environment.
>
>I use "maven eclipse" to generate the eclipse project files and find
>that is the easierst way to work. It also ensures that my project has
>all the latest dependencies definied in the project.xml. I like to keep
>all the info in the Maven build, and just produce the project files for
>whatever IDE a developer uses..
>
>Eric
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Siegfried Goeschl [mailto:siegfried.goeschl@it20one.at]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:28 AM
>To: Turbine Developers List
>Subject: [Fulcrum] Broken Build - Adding project files?
>
>
>Hi folks,
>
>I committed a huge chunk of code and it seems that at least
>fulcrum-intakeand fulcrum-pool is broken - I'm not sure that I can sort
>out the problems immediatly. Having said that I have a question - what
>is the preferred way of storing project files?!
>
>All of the Fulcrum projects come with a Maven build but now I have to
>dig through fulcrum-intake. Would is be useful to add ready-to-use
>project files into CVS?! The trouble is what IDE to use ... I personally
>
>use Eclipse but it is possible to get a free licence for IDEA for
>comitters.
>
>Any opinions?!
>
>Thanks in advance
>
>Siegfried Goeschl
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: [Fulcrum] Broken Build - Adding project files?
Posted by Eric Pugh <ep...@upstate.com>.
I really lean away from that.. Maybe not a -1, but..
My feeling is that they just end up cluttering things, and never seem to
stay up to date. Especially since often people want to customize them
to their own environment.
I use "maven eclipse" to generate the eclipse project files and find
that is the easierst way to work. It also ensures that my project has
all the latest dependencies definied in the project.xml. I like to keep
all the info in the Maven build, and just produce the project files for
whatever IDE a developer uses..
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Siegfried Goeschl [mailto:siegfried.goeschl@it20one.at]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:28 AM
To: Turbine Developers List
Subject: [Fulcrum] Broken Build - Adding project files?
Hi folks,
I committed a huge chunk of code and it seems that at least
fulcrum-intakeand fulcrum-pool is broken - I'm not sure that I can sort
out the problems immediatly. Having said that I have a question - what
is the preferred way of storing project files?!
All of the Fulcrum projects come with a Maven build but now I have to
dig through fulcrum-intake. Would is be useful to add ready-to-use
project files into CVS?! The trouble is what IDE to use ... I personally
use Eclipse but it is possible to get a free licence for IDEA for
comitters.
Any opinions?!
Thanks in advance
Siegfried Goeschl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org